The French-Jewish thinker Emmanuel Levinas (1906-1995) is today remembered as the central moralist of the twentieth century and remains a major presence in the contemporary humanities. In this book, written in lucid and jargon-free prose, Samuel Moyn provides a first and controversial history of the makings of his thought, and especially of his trademark concept of "the other."
Restoring Levinas to the intellectually rich and combative atmosphere of interwar Europe, Origins of the Other overturns a number of views that have attained almost stereotypical familiarity. In a careful overview of Levinas's career, Moyn documents the philosopher's early allegiance to the great German thinker Martin Heidegger. Showing that Levinas crafted an idiosyncratic vision of Judaism, rather than returning to any traditional source, Moyn makes the startling suggestion that Protestant theology, as it spread across the continent in new forms, may have been the most plausible source of Levinas's core concept. In Origins of the Other, Moyn offers new readings of the work of a host of crucial thinkers, such as Hannah Arendt, Karl Barth, Karl Löwith, Gabriel Marcel, Jean-Paul Sartre, and Franz Rosenzweig, who help explain why Levinas's thought evolved as it did.
Moyn concludes by showing how "the other" assumed an ethical bearing (long after its first invention) when Levinas's thought crystallized in Cold War debates about intellectual engagement and the relation of morality and politics. An epilogue relates Levinas's Totality and Infinity to current philosophical discussions in Europe and America and reflects on the difficult relationship between philosophy and religion in the modern world.
1 有用 浅中 2023-03-24 06:29:00 江苏
一段哲学史: “Levinas’s Kierkegaardianization of Rosenzweig in opposing Heidegger". For "it consisted in a preference for Kierkegaard's interpersonal definition of transcendence against the ontological defi... 一段哲学史: “Levinas’s Kierkegaardianization of Rosenzweig in opposing Heidegger". For "it consisted in a preference for Kierkegaard's interpersonal definition of transcendence against the ontological definition that Heidegger pioneered”. 作者的评论更关注于其在历史与启示/哲学与神学/政治与道德之间的张力:an inability to transcend religion in the name of a purely human viewpoint (展开)
0 有用 驺虞语 2025-03-03 21:19:45 上海
材料比较丰富的思想史研究,比较好的点是把握了列维纳斯从犹太教的走出与基督中心论带来的影响,勾勒到了克尔凯郭尔和巴特。很多解释已经成为了共识。实际上沿着这一条脉络更进一步,很容易将其上诉到罗/克-谢林-波墨/埃克哈特及巴特-路德-奥古斯丁-圣保罗。列的关切因而可以被转写为:在Autrui absolu前,人何以(非)是。这也是列参与彼时之时代精神的方式。
0 有用 objective? 2020-10-10 01:02:45
纯粹而扎实的思想史研究。