A two-volume study of political thought from the late thirteenth to the end of the sixteenth century, the decisive period of transition from medieval to modern political theory. The work is intended to be both an introduction to the period for students, and a presentation and justification of a particular approach to the interpretation of historical texts. Quentin Skinner gives...
A two-volume study of political thought from the late thirteenth to the end of the sixteenth century, the decisive period of transition from medieval to modern political theory. The work is intended to be both an introduction to the period for students, and a presentation and justification of a particular approach to the interpretation of historical texts. Quentin Skinner gives an outline account of all the principal texts of the period, discussing in turn the chief political writings of Dante, Marsiglio, Bartolus, Machiavelli, Erasmus and more, Luther and Calvin, Bodin and the Calvinist revolutionaries. But he also examines a very large number of lesser writers in order to explain the general social and intellectual context in which these leading theorists worked. He thus presents the history not as a procession of 'classic texts' but are more readily intelligible. He traces by this means the gradual emergence of the vocabulary of modern political thought, and in particular the crucial concept of the State. We are given an insight into the actual processes of the formation of ideologies and into some of the linkages between political theory and practice. Professor Skinner has been awarded the Balzan Prize Life Time Achievement Award for Political Thought, History and Theory. Full details of this award can be found at http://www.balzan.it/News_eng.aspx?ID=2474
The Foundations of Modern Political Thought的创作者
· · · · · ·
There were two main strands of Republican ideology available to these latter-day protagonists of popular government: one was the fourteenth-century tradition of Italian scholasticism; the other was th...There were two main strands of Republican ideology available to these latter-day protagonists of popular government: one was the fourteenth-century tradition of Italian scholasticism; the other was the early fifteenth-century tradition of 'civic' humanism.(展开)
最开始有些难进入，但悟到脉络后便柳暗花明，导言的方法论是钥匙，值得多次重温。人文主义自欧洲最南端的意大利城邦对《罗马法》的阐释兴起，逐渐扩散并吞噬自身，到最北端人文主义之子托马斯·莫尔以激进平等理念反对人文主义结束。尽管还是目的论了一些，但本书要言不烦，叙事、分析、文笔都是大师级的，真不愧为思想史经典。剑桥学派的语境式方法论不好操作，稍不留神就会滑入堆砌赘述而失却主脉络，只有达到斯金纳的水平才有这...最开始有些难进入，但悟到脉络后便柳暗花明，导言的方法论是钥匙，值得多次重温。人文主义自欧洲最南端的意大利城邦对《罗马法》的阐释兴起，逐渐扩散并吞噬自身，到最北端人文主义之子托马斯·莫尔以激进平等理念反对人文主义结束。尽管还是目的论了一些，但本书要言不烦，叙事、分析、文笔都是大师级的，真不愧为思想史经典。剑桥学派的语境式方法论不好操作，稍不留神就会滑入堆砌赘述而失却主脉络，只有达到斯金纳的水平才有这种sense of proporation. (展开)
最开始有些难进入，但悟到脉络后便柳暗花明，导言的方法论是钥匙，值得多次重温。人文主义自欧洲最南端的意大利城邦对《罗马法》的阐释兴起，逐渐扩散并吞噬自身，到最北端人文主义之子托马斯·莫尔以激进平等理念反对人文主义结束。尽管还是目的论了一些，但本书要言不烦，叙事、分析、文笔都是大师级的，真不愧为思想史经典。剑桥学派的语境式方法论不好操作，稍不留神就会滑入堆砌赘述而失却主脉络，只有达到斯金纳的水平才有这...最开始有些难进入，但悟到脉络后便柳暗花明，导言的方法论是钥匙，值得多次重温。人文主义自欧洲最南端的意大利城邦对《罗马法》的阐释兴起，逐渐扩散并吞噬自身，到最北端人文主义之子托马斯·莫尔以激进平等理念反对人文主义结束。尽管还是目的论了一些，但本书要言不烦，叙事、分析、文笔都是大师级的，真不愧为思想史经典。剑桥学派的语境式方法论不好操作，稍不留神就会滑入堆砌赘述而失却主脉络，只有达到斯金纳的水平才有这种sense of proporation. (展开)
There were two main strands of Republican ideology available to these latter-day protagonists of popular government: one was the fourteenth-century tradition of Italian scholasticism; the other was th...There were two main strands of Republican ideology available to these latter-day protagonists of popular government: one was the fourteenth-century tradition of Italian scholasticism; the other was the early fifteenth-century tradition of 'civic' humanism.(展开)
Academic book, not popular writing, with a lot of repetition, direct citation and cross reference. The advantage is that it is a very clear layout of political theories transitioning from medieval to ...Academic book, not popular writing, with a lot of repetition, direct citation and cross reference. The advantage is that it is a very clear layout of political theories transitioning from medieval to penumbra of modern time (展开)
![[英国] 昆廷·斯金纳](https://img3.doubanio.com/img/author/medium/public/1535724961.52.jpg)
昆廷·斯金纳 作者
malingcat
商务印书馆2002版
江绪林
译林出版社2011版
非常道
译林出版社2011版
G.D.
译林出版社2011版
诚明
译林出版社2011版
嘎嘣嘎嘣脆
译林出版社2011版
1 有用 丁萌 2011-06-14 17:21:22
补习文化课
0 有用 幻無蝶音 2013-04-08 02:46:24
来来回回，回回来来，当历史课本看吧还是
1 有用 陆钓雪de飘飘 2021-06-04 18:16:56
There were two main strands of Republican ideology available to these latter-day protagonists of popular government: one was the fourteenth-century tradition of Italian scholasticism; the other was th... There were two main strands of Republican ideology available to these latter-day protagonists of popular government: one was the fourteenth-century tradition of Italian scholasticism; the other was the early fifteenth-century tradition of 'civic' humanism. (展开)
0 有用 榆杉子 2023-11-29 00:06:41 英国
最开始有些难进入，但悟到脉络后便柳暗花明，导言的方法论是钥匙，值得多次重温。人文主义自欧洲最南端的意大利城邦对《罗马法》的阐释兴起，逐渐扩散并吞噬自身，到最北端人文主义之子托马斯·莫尔以激进平等理念反对人文主义结束。尽管还是目的论了一些，但本书要言不烦，叙事、分析、文笔都是大师级的，真不愧为思想史经典。剑桥学派的语境式方法论不好操作，稍不留神就会滑入堆砌赘述而失却主脉络，只有达到斯金纳的水平才有这... 最开始有些难进入，但悟到脉络后便柳暗花明，导言的方法论是钥匙，值得多次重温。人文主义自欧洲最南端的意大利城邦对《罗马法》的阐释兴起，逐渐扩散并吞噬自身，到最北端人文主义之子托马斯·莫尔以激进平等理念反对人文主义结束。尽管还是目的论了一些，但本书要言不烦，叙事、分析、文笔都是大师级的，真不愧为思想史经典。剑桥学派的语境式方法论不好操作，稍不留神就会滑入堆砌赘述而失却主脉络，只有达到斯金纳的水平才有这种sense of proporation. (展开)
0 有用 Hypnos 2020-03-29 15:58:32
教材般的清晰，斯金纳在论述中相对降低了基督教语境对政治思想的影响，具体内容可能都有待商榷😂如果懒得读全篇，那就看一下前言和结语就足够熟悉他的观点了。
0 有用 榆杉子 2023-11-29 00:06:41 英国
最开始有些难进入，但悟到脉络后便柳暗花明，导言的方法论是钥匙，值得多次重温。人文主义自欧洲最南端的意大利城邦对《罗马法》的阐释兴起，逐渐扩散并吞噬自身，到最北端人文主义之子托马斯·莫尔以激进平等理念反对人文主义结束。尽管还是目的论了一些，但本书要言不烦，叙事、分析、文笔都是大师级的，真不愧为思想史经典。剑桥学派的语境式方法论不好操作，稍不留神就会滑入堆砌赘述而失却主脉络，只有达到斯金纳的水平才有这... 最开始有些难进入，但悟到脉络后便柳暗花明，导言的方法论是钥匙，值得多次重温。人文主义自欧洲最南端的意大利城邦对《罗马法》的阐释兴起，逐渐扩散并吞噬自身，到最北端人文主义之子托马斯·莫尔以激进平等理念反对人文主义结束。尽管还是目的论了一些，但本书要言不烦，叙事、分析、文笔都是大师级的，真不愧为思想史经典。剑桥学派的语境式方法论不好操作，稍不留神就会滑入堆砌赘述而失却主脉络，只有达到斯金纳的水平才有这种sense of proporation. (展开)
1 有用 陆钓雪de飘飘 2021-06-04 18:16:56
There were two main strands of Republican ideology available to these latter-day protagonists of popular government: one was the fourteenth-century tradition of Italian scholasticism; the other was th... There were two main strands of Republican ideology available to these latter-day protagonists of popular government: one was the fourteenth-century tradition of Italian scholasticism; the other was the early fifteenth-century tradition of 'civic' humanism. (展开)
0 有用 headradio 2021-02-28 12:02:53
Academic book, not popular writing, with a lot of repetition, direct citation and cross reference. The advantage is that it is a very clear layout of political theories transitioning from medieval to ... Academic book, not popular writing, with a lot of repetition, direct citation and cross reference. The advantage is that it is a very clear layout of political theories transitioning from medieval to penumbra of modern time (展开)
0 有用 Keto 2020-10-12 15:50:38
恢复文艺复兴和现代早期的复杂面相，巨型资料库
0 有用 Hypnos 2020-03-29 15:58:32
教材般的清晰，斯金纳在论述中相对降低了基督教语境对政治思想的影响，具体内容可能都有待商榷😂如果懒得读全篇，那就看一下前言和结语就足够熟悉他的观点了。