This last book by the late John Rawls, derived from written lectures and notes for his long-running course on modern political philosophy, offers readers an account of the liberal political tradition from a scholar viewed by many as the greatest contemporary exponent of the philosophy behind that tradition. Rawls' goal in the lectures was, he wrote, "to identify the more centra...
This last book by the late John Rawls, derived from written lectures and notes for his long-running course on modern political philosophy, offers readers an account of the liberal political tradition from a scholar viewed by many as the greatest contemporary exponent of the philosophy behind that tradition. Rawls' goal in the lectures was, he wrote, "to identify the more central features of liberalism as expressing a political conception of justice when liberalism is viewed from within the tradition of democratic constitutionalism". He does this by looking at several strands that make up the liberal and democratic constitutional traditions, and at the historical figures who best represent these strands - among them the contractarians Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau; the utilitarians Hume, Sidgwick, and J. S. Mill; and Marx regarded as a critic of liberalism. Rawls' lectures on Bishop Joseph Butler also are included in an appendix. Constantly revised and refined over three decades, Rawls' lectures on these figures reflect his developing and changing views on the history of liberalism and democracy - as well as how he saw his own work in relation to those traditions. With its clear and careful analyses of the doctrine of the social contract, utilitarianism, and socialism - and of their most influential proponents - this volume has a critical place in the traditions it expounds. Marked by Rawls' characteristic patience and curiosity, and scrupulously edited by his student and teaching assistant, Samuel Freeman, these lectures are a fitting final addition to his oeuvre, and to the history of political philosophy as well.
Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy的创作者
· · · · · ·
2. A second question is this: In addressing this audience, what are the credentials of political philosophy? What are its claims to authority? I use the term “authority” here because some have said that writers in moral and political philosophy claim a certain authority, at least implicitly. It has been said that political philosophy conveys a claim to know, and that the claim to know is a claim to rule.1 This assertion is, I believe, completely mistaken. In a democratic society at least, political philosophy has no authority at all, if by authority is meant a certain legal standing and possession of an authoritative weight on certain political matters; or if, alternatively, it means an authority sanctioned by long-standing custom and practice, and treated as having evidential force.
P... (查看原文)
【《政治哲学史讲义》依据的是Rawls从20世纪60年代到1995年在哈佛大学的课堂讲义和笔记,2007年由Samuel Freeman编辑出版。对霍布斯的自然状态、卢梭的amour de propre的两种形式、普遍意志(过于Rawlsian)的解读真是精彩,密尔的规则功利主义以及将密尔的自由原则理解为民主...
(展开)
约翰·罗尔斯:《政治哲学史讲义》,杨通进、李丽丽、林航译,中国社会科学出版社2011年版;译自John Rawls, Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy,ed. by Samuel Freeman, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2007 【按:这本讲义是罗尔斯在哈佛大学...
(展开)
0 有用 FeminineCannon 2019-12-08 21:39:51
“阅读政治哲学作品关键不在于寻找其漏洞,而是看是否能从中提取出连贯一致的框架。”关于Sidgwick和Joseph Butler的内容真是打开新世界了。
0 有用 黑川铃子的堂嫂 2020-06-08 14:21:35
讲道理这种reading也不会特别mind-blowing (especially after listening to Honneth’s lectures); 但的确讲得非常详细清晰了,感觉是个自学入门的好教材。
0 有用 陳山奈 2024-07-03 00:42:28 比利时
罗尔斯的政治哲学史讲座,清晰展现了其如何看待自己所继承的契约论传统,从这个角度来讲,这种展现比单纯看他的论著还更鲜明
0 有用 op131 2010-03-01 02:25:59
Dry. Will reread.
0 有用 Vita Nova 2023-06-22 15:27:41 北京
我注六经,甚至很适合用来理解罗尔斯自己的想法。罗尔斯真把《社会契约论》这书当作《正义论》的雏形了。