作者:
Martin Jay 出版社: University of California Press 副标题: The Denigration of Vision in Twentieth-Century French Thought 出版年: 1994-9-2 页数: 648 定价: USD 38.95 装帧: Paperback ISBN: 9780520088856
Long considered 'the noblest of the senses', vision has increasingly come under critical scrutiny by a wide range of thinkers who question its dominance in Western culture. These critics of vision, especially prominent in twentieth-century France, have challenged its allegedly superior capacity to provide access to the world. They have also criticized its supposed complicity wi...
Long considered 'the noblest of the senses', vision has increasingly come under critical scrutiny by a wide range of thinkers who question its dominance in Western culture. These critics of vision, especially prominent in twentieth-century France, have challenged its allegedly superior capacity to provide access to the world. They have also criticized its supposed complicity with political and social oppression through the promulgation of spectacle and surveillance. Martin Jay turns to this discourse surrounding vision and explores its often contradictory implications in the work of such influential figures as Jean-Paul Sartre, Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Michel Foucault, Jacques Lacan, Louis Althusser, Guy Debord, Luce Irigaray, Emmanuel Levinas, and Jacques Derrida. Jay begins with a discussion of the theory of vision from Plato to Descartes, then considers its role in the French Enlightenment before turning to its status in the culture of modernity. From consideration of French Impressionism to analysis of Georges Bataille and the Surrealists, Roland Barthes' writings on photography, and the film theory of Christian Metz, Jay provides lucid and fair-minded accounts of thinkers and ideas widely known for their difficulty. His book examines the myriad links between the interrogation of vision and the pervasive antihumanist, antimodernist, and counter-enlightenment tenor of much recent French thought. Refusing, however, to defend the dominant visual order, he calls instead for a plurality of 'scopic regimes'. Certain to generate controversy and discussion throughout the humanities and social sciences, "Downcast Eyes" will consolidate Jay's reputation as one of today's premier cultural and intellectual historians.
作者简介
· · · · · ·
Martin Jay is Sidney Hellman Ehrman Professor Emeritus of History at the University of California, Berkeley. His books include Force Fields (1992), Marxism and Totality (California, 1984), Adorno (1984), and The Dialectical Imagination (1973).
目录
· · · · · ·
Contents
Acknowledgments ix
Introduction 1
Chapter One: The Noblest of the Senses: Vision from Plato to Descartes 21
Chapter Two: Dialectic of EnLIGHTenment 83
Chapter Three: The Crisis of the Ancien Scopic Régime: From the Impressionists to
· · · · · ·
(更多)
Contents
Acknowledgments ix
Introduction 1
Chapter One: The Noblest of the Senses: Vision from Plato to Descartes 21
Chapter Two: Dialectic of EnLIGHTenment 83
Chapter Three: The Crisis of the Ancien Scopic Régime: From the Impressionists to
Bergson 149
Chapter Four: The Disenchantment of the Eye: Bataille and the Surrealists 211
Chapter Five: Sartre, Merleau-Ponty, and the Search for a New Ontology of Sight 263
Chapter Six: Lacan, Althusser, and the Specular Subject of Ideology 329
Chapter Seven: From the Empire of the Gaze to the Society of the Spectacle:
Foucault and Debord 381
Chapter Eight: The Camera as Memento Mori: Barthes, Metz, and the Cahiers du
Cinéma 435
Chapter Nine: "Phallogocularcentrism": Derrida and Irigaray 493
Chapter Ten: The Ethics of Blindness and the Postmodern Sublime: Levinas and
Lyotard 543
Conclusion 587
Index 595
· · · · · · (收起)
虽然斯塔罗宾斯基绝不是没有意识到启蒙运动中视觉复杂的辩证法，但他从来没有表现出像同时代思想家一样的对凝视的深刻怀疑。因此，在《活的眼睛（The Living Eye）》的介绍中，他观察到，观看（le regard）最初指的是“期望、关注、警惕、考虑和守卫”，并得到结论：“我们很难保持眼睛的张开，很难欢迎那些将我们挑选出来的目光。但确实，对于批评者，如同对整个认知事业一样，我们必须说：‘看，这样就可以反过来被看到。’”因为斯塔罗宾斯基比其他许多当代法国思想家更倾向于维持启蒙运动的视觉维度，因为我们将有必要引用其他资源来平衡我们的分析，在这点上，我们得益于他的许多开创性努力。 (查看原文)
转：http://www9.georgetown.edu/faculty/irvinem/theory/Jay VisualTurn-JVC-2002.pdf That visual turn The advent of visual culture Journal of Visual Culture (JVC): While ...
(展开)
Contents Acknowledgments ix Introduction 1 Chapter One: The Noblest of the Senses: Vision from Plato to Descartes 21 Chapter Two: Dialectic of EnLIGHTenment 83 Chapter Three: The Crisis of the Ancien Scopic Régime: From the Impressionists to Bergso...
(展开)
哲夫成城
拜德雅 | 重庆大学出版社2021版
Nostalgia
拜德雅 | 重庆大学出版社2021版
gabymi
拜德雅 | 重庆大学出版社2021版
Eco
5 有用 Eco 2013-03-07 11:50:03
《低垂的眼睛》这部著作在从各个角度对视觉进行总体考察的基础上，重点探讨了20世纪法国思想中的视觉观念，在选取材料的丰富性、涉猎范围的广泛性、分析阐释的深入性、体察洞见的敏锐性方面堪称关于视觉和视觉隐喻的百科全书式的著作。 @2013-03-07 11:50:03
3 有用 小淘气 2019-02-27 11:27:24
《低垂之眼》1.视觉与色情，视觉与意识形态，视觉与性别……巴塔耶，福柯，德波，视觉隐喻，反对生物学上视觉，景观社会，侧重文化研究。反正反对视觉中心论。2.透视（视觉），启蒙，理性vs后现代，对理性霸权的再思考。3.视觉隐喻~超生物学修辞~语言转向。如艺术史反对形式分析研究，里面提到哈尔福斯特，tagg,乔纳森克拉里，罗莎林克劳斯……作者提到了泛视觉理论，呵呵。写于厕所20190227
0 有用 やす 2017-04-17 09:00:03
A daunting project about the western discourse on vision since 18C
0 有用 foot 2018-03-13 09:14:54
exhausting book...
0 有用 Darklight 2020-03-15 14:02:00
经典
0 有用 officer沈 2021-02-09 02:51:44
🥰🥰 ucb值得
0 有用 Darklight 2020-03-15 14:02:00
经典
0 有用 眼肌折腾牛油果 2020-02-15 07:13:02
只读了第一章。有趣是有趣，but then what? 太philology的感觉
3 有用 小淘气 2019-02-27 11:27:24
《低垂之眼》1.视觉与色情，视觉与意识形态，视觉与性别……巴塔耶，福柯，德波，视觉隐喻，反对生物学上视觉，景观社会，侧重文化研究。反正反对视觉中心论。2.透视（视觉），启蒙，理性vs后现代，对理性霸权的再思考。3.视觉隐喻~超生物学修辞~语言转向。如艺术史反对形式分析研究，里面提到哈尔福斯特，tagg,乔纳森克拉里，罗莎林克劳斯……作者提到了泛视觉理论，呵呵。写于厕所20190227
0 有用 puzzled歐 2019-01-15 23:42:40
等着拜德雅的译本