作者:
Jose van Dijck 出版社: Oxford University Press 副标题: A Critical History of Social Media 出版年: 2013-1-30 页数: 240 定价: USD 24.95 装帧: Paperback ISBN: 9780199970780
Social media has come to deeply penetrate our lives: Facebook, YouTube, Twitter and many other platforms define many of our daily habits of communication and creative production. The Culture of Connectivity studies the rise of social media in the first decade of the twenty-first century up until 2012, providing both a historical and a critical analysis of the emergence of major...
Social media has come to deeply penetrate our lives: Facebook, YouTube, Twitter and many other platforms define many of our daily habits of communication and creative production. The Culture of Connectivity studies the rise of social media in the first decade of the twenty-first century up until 2012, providing both a historical and a critical analysis of the emergence of major platforms in the context of a rapidly changing ecosystem of connective media. Such history is needed to understand how these media have come to profoundly affect our experience of online sociality. The first stage of their development shows a fundamental shift. While most sites started out as amateur-driven community platforms, half a decade later they have turned into large corporations that do not just facilitate user connectedness, but have become global information and data mining companies extracting and exploiting user connectivity. Author and media scholar Jose van Dijck offers an analytical prism to examine techno-cultural as well as socio-economic aspects of this transformation. She dissects five major platforms: Facebook, Twitter, Flickr, YouTube, and Wikipedia. Each of these microsystems occupies a distinct position in the larger ecology of connective media, and yet, their underlying mechanisms for coding interfaces, steering users, and filtering content rely on shared ideological principles. At the level of management and organization, we can also observe striking similarities between these platforms' shifting ownership status, governance strategies, and business models. Reconstructing the premises on which these platforms are built, this study highlights how norms for online interaction and communication gradually changed. "Sharing," "friending," "liking," "following," "trending," and "favoriting" have come to denote online practices imbued with specific technological and economic meanings. This process of normalization, the author argues, is part of a larger political and ideological battle over information control in an online world where everything is bound to become social. Crossing lines of technological, historical, sociological, and cultural inquiry, The Culture of Connectivity will reshape the way we think about interpersonal connection in the digital age.
作者简介
· · · · · ·
何塞·范·迪克(José van Dijck,1960— ),女,荷兰阿姆斯特丹大学比较传媒研究院教授,曾任阿姆斯特丹大学人文学院院长。她还是荷兰皇家艺术与科学学院的首位女性主席。2016年被荷兰著名杂志Opzij评为年度最有影响力的荷兰女性。曾出版作品:Mediated Memories in the Digital Age(2007)、The Transparent Body: A Cultural Analysis of Medical Imaging(2005)。
A detailed description of the history of primary gameplayer in the internet; A penetrating insight into how platformed sociality works in the connectedness and connectivity in modern media.
Latourian ANT只构成了作者所谓的“联系性文化”的一半。她的这个核心概念原创性不足,在分析Flickr的一篇文章中充分暴露出来(2010年的吧)。The social shaping of technology和technological shaping of sociality看起来很是有道理,但这其实就是在把大家明明知道的道理用语言包装包装。这个概念的用途大概就是在论文里给你加点戏,...Latourian ANT只构成了作者所谓的“联系性文化”的一半。她的这个核心概念原创性不足,在分析Flickr的一篇文章中充分暴露出来(2010年的吧)。The social shaping of technology和technological shaping of sociality看起来很是有道理,但这其实就是在把大家明明知道的道理用语言包装包装。这个概念的用途大概就是在论文里给你加点戏,让你用来批判over-generalisation的。(展开)
1. the differences between connectivity and connectedness [the double logic of sharing, how did this new ideology (social norms) construct over decade, moving from the second to the first] 2. analytic framework/ model a combination of ANT and PE 3. hist...
(展开)
6 有用 junior 2014-05-01 17:26:25
世界上怎麼會有這麼多叫Van Dijck的話嘮...新媒體研究最可怕的地方就在於,要文科出生的人去分析網站的物性和技術結構,不懂數據結構不懂程式邏輯,就只能從UI和隱私設定上來討論,沒辦法深入。其實書不算爛,作為入門教材來介紹些概念,或者當做研究模板來用都成,再多就沒有了。
1 有用 tinkie 2016-04-17 01:15:08
所谓“社交媒体”并不单纯是为“社交”服务的“媒体”,“社交”内容及性质,已经被“媒体”的技术特点形塑,特别是建立在大数据挖掘与应用基础上的用户信息量化。无论你是哪路神仙都会被转换成“likability"的货币来买卖的。#商业技术的维度
0 有用 飞的鼠 2016-06-19 08:29:13
A detailed description of the history of primary gameplayer in the internet; A penetrating insight into how platformed sociality works in the connectedness and connectivity in modern media.
1 有用 幽篁娴筠 2018-11-04 05:32:52
对于ANT和政经批判结合这件事我真的接受无能(摊手
0 有用 戎易 2018-04-16 05:40:54
FB那章颇精彩,有远见。互联网研究里少有的有细读功夫的书。
0 有用 巨翅 2023-11-30 12:09:11 广东
本书将“连接性”(connectedness)和“连接力”(connectivity)作了一个区分,将人们相互联结的社会性体验称为“连接性”,而平台将用户连接起来并通过个人数据的收集、分析来盘剥用户的能力称之为“连接力”。作者还提出了一个试图牵合行动者网络理论和政治经济学的分析框架,关注“技术—文化建构”(技术、用户、内容)和“社会经济结构”(平台所有权、平台治理、商业模式)。读完之后谈不上有多受... 本书将“连接性”(connectedness)和“连接力”(connectivity)作了一个区分,将人们相互联结的社会性体验称为“连接性”,而平台将用户连接起来并通过个人数据的收集、分析来盘剥用户的能力称之为“连接力”。作者还提出了一个试图牵合行动者网络理论和政治经济学的分析框架,关注“技术—文化建构”(技术、用户、内容)和“社会经济结构”(平台所有权、平台治理、商业模式)。读完之后谈不上有多受启发,可能是因为有的内容已经逐渐变成了今天学界的常识,但分析框架也许仍然可以借鉴。 (展开)
0 有用 千秋 2021-12-08 10:48:08
我觉得写得有点浅诶,对照着之前看过的《硅谷》,明白作者是搭建了一个框架,并且带领中国读者大致了解几巨头是怎么一个德行,是一本入门书……yyy推荐之一,在此标记。这应当是我第四本完整看完的英文书。
0 有用 Shone 2019-02-17 08:30:35
Latourian ANT只构成了作者所谓的“联系性文化”的一半。她的这个核心概念原创性不足,在分析Flickr的一篇文章中充分暴露出来(2010年的吧)。The social shaping of technology和technological shaping of sociality看起来很是有道理,但这其实就是在把大家明明知道的道理用语言包装包装。这个概念的用途大概就是在论文里给你加点戏,... Latourian ANT只构成了作者所谓的“联系性文化”的一半。她的这个核心概念原创性不足,在分析Flickr的一篇文章中充分暴露出来(2010年的吧)。The social shaping of technology和technological shaping of sociality看起来很是有道理,但这其实就是在把大家明明知道的道理用语言包装包装。这个概念的用途大概就是在论文里给你加点戏,让你用来批判over-generalisation的。 (展开)
1 有用 幽篁娴筠 2018-11-04 05:32:52
对于ANT和政经批判结合这件事我真的接受无能(摊手
0 有用 esp吃梦香菇 2018-05-18 09:27:43
写硕士论文时觉得太好了就照着这个模式写,现在能看出点局限性了,一个是虽然宣称用了ant但是落在具体的分析上具体的还是不太多,再一个文科生理解数据算法确实不太懂我现在也愁这个,三是以平台来分的结构目前看还是有点草率。但总的来说还是写得很不错。