Moral Principles and Political Obligations 短评

热门
  • 1 凱特根斯坦 2021-12-01 05:49:27

    "Consent-based theories; Reciprocity-based theories; Justice-based theories"

  • 2 Buffalo’66 2021-10-16 16:58:41

    英文版重读,西蒙斯最经典的作品,论证清楚,语言平易近人。全书最后一句在三十年后读来仍然令人惊醒:For surely a nation composed of such “dutiful citizens ”would be the cruellest sort of trap for the poor,the oppressed,and the alienated.

  • 0 2024-10-16 03:55:20 荷兰

    Autonomy of individuals should be respected, and they should not be automatically bound to obey the state merely because they are born into it. State authority should be based on individual consent, but most modern political systems do not offer real opportunities for individuals to consent to or reject authority.

  • 0 monmon 2023-05-17 17:17:27 英国

    读了chapter3、4、5、6,很清晰很有帮助,I’m convinced by him that there’s no political obligation.

  • 0 田晨彤 2020-05-07 02:49:26

    一书不服你服不服?He either said this theory was wrong, or even if it is correct the means of concluding this is objectionable.

  • 0 团结团结团结! 2021-10-07 15:25:03

    前四章,同意理论中分析了洛克的不足,但政府论里有些东西本身就是默认设置,感觉也不像作者所说的忽略和矛盾的问题。

  • 0 Vita Nova 2025-03-04 10:49:52 美国

    29岁写成这样的书……叹为观止。

  • 0 一夜飞渡镜湖月 2020-12-11 21:21:59

    虽然从Chapter V开始是在一种半信半疑的状态下继续阅读的,但是Simmons简明的文本、清晰的思路绝对会是打开新大门的钥匙

<< 首页 < 前页 后页 >