作者:
Edward J. M. Rhoads 出版社: University of Washington Press 副标题: Ethnic Relations and Political Power in Late Qing and Early Republican China, 1861-1928 出版年: 2000-6-23 页数: 404 定价: USD 33.00 装帧: Paperback 丛书:Studies on Ethnic Groups in China ISBN: 9780295980409
China's 1911-12 Revolution, which overthrew a 2000-year succession of dynasties, is thought of primarily as a change in governmental style, from imperial to republican, traditional to modern. But given that the dynasty that was overthrown—the Qing—was that of a minority ethnic group that had ruled China's Han majority for nearly three centuries, and that the revolutio...
China's 1911-12 Revolution, which overthrew a 2000-year succession of dynasties, is thought of primarily as a change in governmental style, from imperial to republican, traditional to modern. But given that the dynasty that was overthrown—the Qing—was that of a minority ethnic group that had ruled China's Han majority for nearly three centuries, and that the revolutionaries were overwhelmingly Han, to what extent was the revolution not only anti-monarchical, but also anti-Manchu?
Edward Rhoads explores this provocative and complicated question in Manchus and Han, analyzing the evolution of the Manchus from a hereditary military caste (the "banner people") to a distinct ethnic group and then detailing the interplay and dialogue between the Manchu court and Han reformers that culminated in the dramatic changes of the early 20th century.
Until now, many scholars have assumed that the Manchus had been assimilated into Han culture long before the 1911 Revolution and were no longer separate and distinguishable. But Rhoads demonstrates that in many ways Manchus remained an alien, privileged, and distinct group. Manchus and Han is a pathbreaking study that will forever change the way historians of China view the events leading to the fall of the Qing dynasty. Likewise, it will clarify for ethnologists the unique origin of the Manchus as an occupational caste and their shifting relationship with the Han, from border people to rulers to ruled.
作者简介
· · · · · ·
Edward J. M. Rhoads is professor of history at the University of Texas at Austin. He is the author of China's Republican Revolution: The Case of Kwangtung, 1895-1913.Winner of the Joseph Levenson Book Prize for Modern China, sponsored by The China and Inner Asia Council of the Association for Asian Studies
目录
· · · · · ·
Intro
Contents
Illustrations
Acknowledgments
Introduction
1 / Separate and Unequal
· · · · · ·
(更多)
Intro
Contents
Illustrations
Acknowledgments
Introduction
1 / Separate and Unequal
2 / Cixi and the “Peculiar Institution”
3 / Zaifeng and the “Manchu Ascendency”
4 / The 1911 Revolution
5 / Court and Manchus after 1911
Conclusion
Notes
Glossary
Bibliography
Index
· · · · · · (收起)
Studies on Ethnic Groups in China (共20册),
这套丛书还有
《Lijiang Stories》,《Empire and Identity in Guizhou》,《The Han》,《Ways of Being Ethnic in Southwest China》,《Medicine and Memory in Tibet》 等。
Edward J . M. Rhoads , Manchus and Han : Ethnic Relations and Political Power in Late Qing and Early Republican China , 1861—1928 ,Seattle and London : University of Washington Press , 2000 ,394pp. 2002 年4 月初在华盛顿召开的亚洲学会第54 届年会上, 宣...
(展开)
4 有用 月半女史地板君 2013-11-07 08:06:01
感觉是为了反驳Mary Wright而专门写了本书一样,这一定是真爱。以及那么多次引用老舍真的大丈夫吗……
9 有用 功夫熊猫小碗熊 2016-01-10 13:56:33
将满族构建认同与满汉关系问题延展到清朝最末期,与欧柯接续而又有分歧,强调满族/满人形成的政治性。最早确有皇太极溯源语言文化和神话,但盛清时更多表现为八旗分区驻防、朝廷恩宠、社会隔离、文化差异(服装、语言、不缠足)职业差异(世袭旗兵或不经科举当官)而形成军事职业共同体,基于政治权力与精英封闭循环,旗制亦逐渐和满人概念交缠而旗满一体,相应地非旗/满的汉人精英亦逐步塑造双方认同。晚清改革触动旗人利益,汉... 将满族构建认同与满汉关系问题延展到清朝最末期,与欧柯接续而又有分歧,强调满族/满人形成的政治性。最早确有皇太极溯源语言文化和神话,但盛清时更多表现为八旗分区驻防、朝廷恩宠、社会隔离、文化差异(服装、语言、不缠足)职业差异(世袭旗兵或不经科举当官)而形成军事职业共同体,基于政治权力与精英封闭循环,旗制亦逐渐和满人概念交缠而旗满一体,相应地非旗/满的汉人精英亦逐步塑造双方认同。晚清改革触动旗人利益,汉族精英多次提出旗人优待与宗亲权力过大问题,但慈禧奕匡载沣均未全心意推动清理,最终授予激进革命党口实,暴力革命中权力诉求亦夹杂排满情绪,也是在革命中满族/满人概念确立于民族/族群歧异。民国后为接管清代疆域而优待清室、五族共和,亦进一步确立满人为族之念,至PRC方以基于自我认同之划分确立狭隘的满族。 (展开)
0 有用 雪霜木奴 2021-12-18 23:31:59
年探讨了这一具有煽动性和复杂性的问题,分析了满族从世袭的军事种姓(即“旗人”)到独特的民族群体的演变,然后详细阐述了满族法院和汉朝改革者之间的相互作用和对话,最终导致了20世纪早期的戏剧性变化。
0 有用 YY 2021-11-04 23:38:57
2018年写politics of inequality的paper时读过
0 有用 咂赞嘎鲁 2018-09-17 13:53:35
以满汉/旗民关系的角度梳理了晚清史。我看有人说不买账满/八旗文化对汉文化影响,我觉得这个我还是买账的,但我实在是不太买账这个旗人=满人的等号... 或许八旗文化很大程度上代表了满文化;最后八旗制度的废除是满族从一个military caste到一个ethnic group的转变;即使到清末很多满人已经不怎么会说满语,皇帝也不搞骑马射箭了;但是在八旗制度结束前满族人有明显的民族意识,且是一种独立于旗... 以满汉/旗民关系的角度梳理了晚清史。我看有人说不买账满/八旗文化对汉文化影响,我觉得这个我还是买账的,但我实在是不太买账这个旗人=满人的等号... 或许八旗文化很大程度上代表了满文化;最后八旗制度的废除是满族从一个military caste到一个ethnic group的转变;即使到清末很多满人已经不怎么会说满语,皇帝也不搞骑马射箭了;但是在八旗制度结束前满族人有明显的民族意识,且是一种独立于旗人身份意识之外的意识(即他们不同于且高于汉族包衣、八旗汉军,并且一定程度上保留民族特有的家人称呼、萨满信仰、亲母系等习惯)。 (展开)
0 有用 Simplicio 2022-06-14 10:07:49
将满汉族群(ethnicity)关系放在同治中兴、慈禧载沣清末新政、辛亥革命、北洋军阀等大背景下,强调一直以来鲜明的满汉差异对清末民初的深远影响,如排满反满思想在清末革命运动中的显著位置,酿成革命党对旗人大肆屠杀的悲剧后果,基础史料丰富扎实,对于“旗人”、“八旗”、“满”、“汉”等概念的阐述十分有条理,叙事详尽,有时稍显繁琐。
0 有用 山白 2022-01-04 22:55:55
nationalism 论文参考书之一
0 有用 雪霜木奴 2021-12-18 23:31:59
年探讨了这一具有煽动性和复杂性的问题,分析了满族从世袭的军事种姓(即“旗人”)到独特的民族群体的演变,然后详细阐述了满族法院和汉朝改革者之间的相互作用和对话,最终导致了20世纪早期的戏剧性变化。
0 有用 YY 2021-11-04 23:38:57
2018年写politics of inequality的paper时读过
0 有用 蕺水 2021-03-15 05:23:51
講述了Manchu 在清末(80s-90s)如何從一個military caste 變成了一個ethnic group的故事. 作者認為Manchu 之前就類似日本的武士階層, Interesting!