I can see now, at the end of my map zone, that this book is shaped as an architectural ensemble. It is a construction that has a peculiar, reversible way of being entered and exited. Walking in and out and through the curvilinear ramp that leads up to Le Corbusier's Carpenter Center ( the building at Harvard University in which I have been teaching the past eight years while developing this book) must have had a real effect on me. It is on this ramp that Le Corbusier and Eisenstein, or rather architecture and film, by the large, have come together in my thinking and affected the book's own architectonics. (查看原文)
Greenaway's obsessive aesthetic measures labor in hybrid forms that venture beyond the traditional territory of film, reaching for that intersection of the map, the wall, and the screen. (查看原文)
1 有用 养生好养生妙 2018-12-31 18:12:58
跳着读的
1 有用 backyard’ulu 2018-09-16 04:38:09
意义重大但并不readable
0 有用 Visin 2017-07-30 17:13:48
"haptic" cinematic experience，结合Pallasmaa的现象学观点：lived space, mental mapping
0 有用 𝑾𝒂𝒍𝒅𝒆𝒊𝒏𝒔𝒂𝒎𝒌𝒆𝒊𝒕 2023-07-27 00:02:27 江苏
选读。对我来说，论述电影建筑的部分最具启发性。
0 有用 散木 2023-06-18 18:31:32 英国
选读了一些，多么希望自己能无忧无虑地完整读完。像是博物馆展览一样的书，融合了我许多兴趣点（室内、珍奇屋、蜡像、花园等等），通过类比竟都能与电影联系起来，完成从视觉凝视与掌控到身体运动与情感的范式转换，如果能有策展人把它设计成一场关于电影haptic e-motion的前历史肯定会很有趣。但如果是为了写论文寻求严密的论证就会比较失望，这本书更像是一个个精彩的小片段，不像有线性的论证逻辑，一些局部的修... 选读了一些，多么希望自己能无忧无虑地完整读完。像是博物馆展览一样的书，融合了我许多兴趣点（室内、珍奇屋、蜡像、花园等等），通过类比竟都能与电影联系起来，完成从视觉凝视与掌控到身体运动与情感的范式转换，如果能有策展人把它设计成一场关于电影haptic e-motion的前历史肯定会很有趣。但如果是为了写论文寻求严密的论证就会比较失望，这本书更像是一个个精彩的小片段，不像有线性的论证逻辑，一些局部的修辞与隐喻也很让人迷惑，同一个词的意义在不同地方感觉都不一样。 (展开)