In the space of barely more than five years, with the publication of four pathbreaking books, Slavoj Zizek has earned the reputation of being one of the most arresting, insightful, and scandalous thinkers in recent memory. Perhaps more than any other single author, his writings have constituted the most compelling evidence available for recognizing Jacques Lacan as the preemient philosopher of our time.
In "Tarrying with the Negative," Zizek challenges the contemporary critique of ideology, and in doing so opens the way for a new understanding of social conflict, particularly the recent outbursts of nationalism and ethnic struggle. Are we, Zizek asks, confined to a postmodern universe in which truth is reduced to the contingent effect of various discursive practices and where our subjectivity is dispersed through a multitude of ideological positions? "No" is his answer, and the way out is a return to philosophy. This revisit to German Idealism allows Zizek to recast the critique of ideology as a tool for disclosing the dynamic of our society, a crucial aspect of which is the debate over nationalism, particularly as it has developed in the Balkans--Zizek's home. He brings the debate over nationalism into the sphere of contemporary cultural politics, breaking the impasse centered on nationalisms simultaneously fascistic and anticolonial aspirations. Provocatively, Zizek argues that what drives nationalistic and ethnic antagonism is a collectively driven refusal of our own enjoyment.
Using examples from popular culture and high theory to illuminate each other--opera, film noir, capitalist universalism, religious and ethnic fundamentalism--this work testifies to the fact that, far more radically than the postmodern sophists, Kant and Hegel are our contemporaries.
14 有用 merleau 2013-11-30 23:59:56
从1993年的这本到2012的Less than nothing,中间这20年就像没过一样
9 有用 尒 2018-07-22 06:05:52
谢林的神之分裂传自伯麦,齐泽克给谢林补上的,实际是晚期喀巴拉“圣杯破裂”shevirath Ha-Kilim与“回归”的一面
3 有用 半废明陀 2024-09-16 13:05:03 广西
只能在标题和开头陈辞里面讲心里话、而之后就只能不断症状化复读的齐泽克和中国齐泽克→_→(把《道心种魔大法》当作《道心种魔大法》修炼走火入魔是常态,当作《嫁衣神功》来修庶几才对路)——不搞清楚近现代经典哲学所伴随的哲学方法(德古、现象学),直接就使用后世那帮白嫖狂魔们的术语体系来哲学化怎么可能做好哲学?!康、黑的主要原著才是根本,齐泽克写的东西只是参考,不要搞反了(这样,你下矿时才能在坑道里见到雪林... 只能在标题和开头陈辞里面讲心里话、而之后就只能不断症状化复读的齐泽克和中国齐泽克→_→(把《道心种魔大法》当作《道心种魔大法》修炼走火入魔是常态,当作《嫁衣神功》来修庶几才对路)——不搞清楚近现代经典哲学所伴随的哲学方法(德古、现象学),直接就使用后世那帮白嫖狂魔们的术语体系来哲学化怎么可能做好哲学?!康、黑的主要原著才是根本,齐泽克写的东西只是参考,不要搞反了(这样,你下矿时才能在坑道里见到雪林、巧乐兹)——仅仅用现成的、固化的齐泽克术语来做推理就几乎不可能抓住齐泽克的小尾巴,绝对差异只会把人颠倒为德古-精化齐小将,而不是内在性的德古化或精神分析化——内在性模型化和真正的内在超越化差一脚就差一个维度,差一脚你就动弹不得(能在-颠倒),费大师的“极乐生活”才是德古人的精神追求,是自由之扬弃! (展开)
4 有用 anonymous v 2020-12-30 23:32:29
中文版就这么给糟践了。有些可惜。
2 有用 远方の夏 2017-10-08 18:52:56
老齐读多了几本就觉得有点腻,感觉千篇一律乏味得很,用的方法还是精神分析那一套,就是研究的问题一直在换。