To read Lacan closely is to follow him to the letter, to take him literally, making the wager that he comes right out and says what he means in many cases, though much of his argument must be reconstructed through a line-by-line examination. And this is precisely what Bruce Fink does in this ambitious book, a fine analysis of Lacan’s work on language and psychoanalytic treatment conducted on the basis of a very close reading of texts in his Écrits: A Selection.
As a translator and renowned proponent of Lacan’s works, Fink is an especially adept and congenial guide through the complexities of Lacanian literature and concepts. He devotes considerable space to notions that have been particularly prone to misunderstanding, notions such as “the sliding of the signified under the signifier,” or that have gone seemingly unnoticed, such as “the ego is the metonymy of desire.” Fink also pays special attention to psychoanalytic concepts, like affect, that Lacan is sometimes thought to neglect, and to controversial concepts, like the phallus.
From a parsing of Lacan’s claim that “commenting on a text is like doing an analysis,” to sustained readings of “The Instance of the Letter in the Unconscious,” “The Direction of the Treatment,” and “Subversion of the Subject” (with particular attention given to the Graph of Desire), Fink’s book is a work of unmatched subtlety, depth, and detail, providing a valuable new perspective on one of the twentieth century’s most important thinkers.
1 有用 西希弗的石头 2024-02-18 11:03:07 广东
偏向临床的阅读视角,还可以。《文字动因》将能指比作火鸡挺好玩,能指和所指只有烹饪关系而没有性关系,从50s的拉康中读出了“去除意义的解释”的技术。
1 有用 WWH 2022-09-09 20:11:35 四川
芬克教你拉康如何教你读拉康
0 有用 Herr.Nos 2010-07-16 23:33:33
拉康中毒症患者的一剂解毒药
1 有用 伢栗野 2024-05-22 13:19:20 美国
am i on the verge of understanding lacan??? one thing is that at the end fink distinguishes the subject of the signifiers, and the subject of jouissance, the latter he identifies w the drives and affe... am i on the verge of understanding lacan??? one thing is that at the end fink distinguishes the subject of the signifiers, and the subject of jouissance, the latter he identifies w the drives and affect. but earlier in the book he also associates affect w the imaginary. are there 2 kinds of affects? what’s their relations? (展开)
1 有用 顾顾顾 2022-05-13 10:54:17
比吴琼那本好读多了,中文导读类学术书就像水煮鸡胸肉,太柴了。