出版社: Cambridge University Press
副标题: An Introduction to Basic Concepts
出版年: 1984-9-28
页数: 384
定价: USD 85.00
装帧: Paperback
ISBN: 9780521281836
内容简介 · · · · · ·
What is the phonological organisation of natural languages like? What theoretical and analytical approaches are most fruitful? Is there any phonological theory that is 'the best' in all ways? The student of phonology is currently faced with a number of major and apparently competing theories, and the textbook writer who genuinely wishes to confront these questions is faced with...
What is the phonological organisation of natural languages like? What theoretical and analytical approaches are most fruitful? Is there any phonological theory that is 'the best' in all ways? The student of phonology is currently faced with a number of major and apparently competing theories, and the textbook writer who genuinely wishes to confront these questions is faced with the task of assessing the contribution each theory can make, while avoiding the merely fashionable or ephemeral in this contentious and evolving discipline. Roger Lass sees phonology as essentially a problem-centred discipline. Since in his view none of the supposedly comprehensive answers proposed to the questions raised above is really comprehensive or acceptable in all its detail, he concentrates rather on introducing the student to the perennial concerns in the study of sound structure. Hence his book adopts a broad and eclectic framework, unbiased toward any one model or theory. Instead, important aspects of the phenomenology of sound structure are discussed in relation to the particular phonological theory - be it Prague phonology, American structuralism, prosodic phonology, generative phonology - for which they are most salient. The book surveys a wide range of competing theories, analytical strategies, and notational systems, and attempts to provide a coherent intellectual and historical perspective on a discipline which has too often been viewed recently as developing via a series of 'revolutions'. Although this textbook assumes some command of phonetics, little other linguistic background is presupposed, and the author carefully provides the groundwork for each new development before it is introduced. In addition, the book deals in detail with two areas not customarily treated extensively in introductory texts; the phonology of casual speech, and phonological change. This spirited and original synthesis will enable its readers to acquire a real understanding of the fundamentals of phonology.
> 更多短评 2 条
Phonology的话题 · · · · · · ( 全部 条 )



Phonology的书评 · · · · · · ( 全部 1 条 )
> 更多书评1篇
读书笔记 · · · · · ·
我来写笔记-
败走恶犬 (Zyy)
There’s no empirical reason why we should expect the ‘best’ feature system to be homogenous, with all features of only one type or another. But there is a kind of a priori reason why linguists often want or expect feature systems to be homogeneous, or insist that they’re defective if they’re not; and this boils down in the end to a matter of aesthetic preference plus philosophical commitment ...2014-04-04 12:36
There’s no empirical reason why we should expect the ‘best’ feature system to be homogenous, with all features of only one type or another. But there is a kind of a priori reason why linguists often want or expect feature systems to be homogeneous, or insist that they’re defective if they’re not; and this boils down in the end to a matter of aesthetic preference plus philosophical commitment (occasionally masquerading as ‘scientific conscience’). The assumption that systems of primitives ought to be formally homogeneous is the result of what I like to call ‘the atomic fallacy’: the view that – what we get down to a basic enough level – the primitive elements of whatever universe we’re concerned with will turn out to be of one type only.
回应 2014-04-04 12:36 -
败走恶犬 (Zyy)
So we introduce a further condition: to qualify as allophones of one phoneme, two phones must not only be in complementary distribution, but they must be phonetically similar. This is a tricky criterion; but we can accept it as intuitively plausible, and in practice workable, even if not formally definable. 只是单纯想感慨下Roger Lass作为才子型学者的行文。。。。 (1回应)2014-03-31 14:05
只是单纯想感慨下Roger Lass作为才子型学者的行文。。。。So we introduce a further condition: to qualify as allophones of one phoneme, two phones must not only be in complementary distribution, but they must be phonetically similar. This is a tricky criterion; but we can accept it as intuitively plausible, and in practice workable, even if not formally definable.
1回应 2014-03-31 14:05
-
败走恶犬 (Zyy)
So we introduce a further condition: to qualify as allophones of one phoneme, two phones must not only be in complementary distribution, but they must be phonetically similar. This is a tricky criterion; but we can accept it as intuitively plausible, and in practice workable, even if not formally definable. 只是单纯想感慨下Roger Lass作为才子型学者的行文。。。。 (1回应)2014-03-31 14:05
只是单纯想感慨下Roger Lass作为才子型学者的行文。。。。So we introduce a further condition: to qualify as allophones of one phoneme, two phones must not only be in complementary distribution, but they must be phonetically similar. This is a tricky criterion; but we can accept it as intuitively plausible, and in practice workable, even if not formally definable.
1回应 2014-03-31 14:05 -
败走恶犬 (Zyy)
There’s no empirical reason why we should expect the ‘best’ feature system to be homogenous, with all features of only one type or another. But there is a kind of a priori reason why linguists often want or expect feature systems to be homogeneous, or insist that they’re defective if they’re not; and this boils down in the end to a matter of aesthetic preference plus philosophical commitment ...2014-04-04 12:36
There’s no empirical reason why we should expect the ‘best’ feature system to be homogenous, with all features of only one type or another. But there is a kind of a priori reason why linguists often want or expect feature systems to be homogeneous, or insist that they’re defective if they’re not; and this boils down in the end to a matter of aesthetic preference plus philosophical commitment (occasionally masquerading as ‘scientific conscience’). The assumption that systems of primitives ought to be formally homogeneous is the result of what I like to call ‘the atomic fallacy’: the view that – what we get down to a basic enough level – the primitive elements of whatever universe we’re concerned with will turn out to be of one type only.
回应 2014-04-04 12:36
-
败走恶犬 (Zyy)
There’s no empirical reason why we should expect the ‘best’ feature system to be homogenous, with all features of only one type or another. But there is a kind of a priori reason why linguists often want or expect feature systems to be homogeneous, or insist that they’re defective if they’re not; and this boils down in the end to a matter of aesthetic preference plus philosophical commitment ...2014-04-04 12:36
There’s no empirical reason why we should expect the ‘best’ feature system to be homogenous, with all features of only one type or another. But there is a kind of a priori reason why linguists often want or expect feature systems to be homogeneous, or insist that they’re defective if they’re not; and this boils down in the end to a matter of aesthetic preference plus philosophical commitment (occasionally masquerading as ‘scientific conscience’). The assumption that systems of primitives ought to be formally homogeneous is the result of what I like to call ‘the atomic fallacy’: the view that – what we get down to a basic enough level – the primitive elements of whatever universe we’re concerned with will turn out to be of one type only.
回应 2014-04-04 12:36 -
败走恶犬 (Zyy)
So we introduce a further condition: to qualify as allophones of one phoneme, two phones must not only be in complementary distribution, but they must be phonetically similar. This is a tricky criterion; but we can accept it as intuitively plausible, and in practice workable, even if not formally definable. 只是单纯想感慨下Roger Lass作为才子型学者的行文。。。。 (1回应)2014-03-31 14:05
只是单纯想感慨下Roger Lass作为才子型学者的行文。。。。So we introduce a further condition: to qualify as allophones of one phoneme, two phones must not only be in complementary distribution, but they must be phonetically similar. This is a tricky criterion; but we can accept it as intuitively plausible, and in practice workable, even if not formally definable.
1回应 2014-03-31 14:05
以下豆列推荐 · · · · · · ( 全部 )
- 音系学 (夜深沉)
- The Linguists' List (嬶天下の徒然)
- 2010 Winter Break (嬶天下の徒然)
谁读这本书?
二手市场
- > 点这儿转让 有9人想读,手里有一本闲着?
订阅关于Phonology的评论:
feed: rss 2.0
0 有用 嬶天下の徒然 2011-05-22
入門材料,但是寫得不簡單,走理論路線的可以看看。
1 有用 败走恶犬 2014-04-10
如果说Ladefoged是技术男,Roger Lass肯定算才子型学者。。。
1 有用 败走恶犬 2014-04-10
如果说Ladefoged是技术男,Roger Lass肯定算才子型学者。。。
0 有用 嬶天下の徒然 2011-05-22
入門材料,但是寫得不簡單,走理論路線的可以看看。