I thought I had known something abt Econ and nothing abt Law before I touched this. well, It's like..I was blew away up to nowhere, and currently only God/Satan can know what I really know or knew.I think I am just sick of Chicago school and need some saltwater. Maybe I will revisit this Oz...later.Spring 2010 [Goodson Law lib loan 2009-10]
0 有用 綦 2010-03-02 08:36:46
I thought I had known something abt Econ and nothing abt Law before I touched this. well, It's like..I was blew away up to nowhere, and currently only God/Satan can know what I really know or knew.I think I am just sick of Chicago school and need some saltwater. Maybe I will revisit this Oz...later.Spring 2010 [Goodson Law lib loan 2009-10]
0 有用 裴多菲冷死, 2014-10-31 06:52:01
在美帝三个月(勉强)读的唯一一本书...
1 有用 仲雪春山 2019-12-29 22:52:01
想要建构透彻的结构需要多读几遍,但是波斯纳写书是真的幼儿园老师级别的细致,手把手给你举例子讲概念——以至于我之前担心看不懂找来的国内版发现删了不少例证。(但国内版翻译很烂,看中文能反想英文级别的机翻,别看。英文是真的写很好。
0 有用 程摸鱼 2021-02-08 10:56:31
虽然饱受批评,但是不得不说影响很大,内容很丰富
0 有用 一腿毛毛 2009-12-19 17:16:49
法律经济分析的经典之作
0 有用 w 2020-02-26 17:00:22
专业性实在是太强了的一本书 需要读一读缓一缓
0 有用 李莲蓬 2015-06-21 21:32:32
用经济学的方法解释法律
0 有用 Austin Lu 2018-06-13 22:41:43
不可否认其学术历史地位,以金钱代替抽象utility的想法直白坦率,但kaldor-hicks效率的使用deeply problematic.