个人的一些设想
主要是看了这个版本的INTRODUCTION启发的一些想法，不知道是否可行
希望有人指点一下
Contents
摘 要 ………………………………………………………………………………. i
Abstract ……………………………………………………….……….………..ii
I. Introduction……………………………………………………………...………..1
II.Metobolic rift: background……………………………...………...2
2.1 Secretary of foregin tougues: Lilton and Endlish civil war……...………… 3
2.2 Enclosing: socio-economic transformation in 17th century England…………………… …5
2.3 The only ture theologie: Reformation and Puritanism value………………….6
III.Dragon’s teeth: prophetic philosophy……………………………………………..7
3.1 They worship the work of their own hands: alienaiton of labor…………….8
3.2Riches grow in hell:critique of fetishism…………………………….9
3.3How shall I relate: the “concept” and the “thing”…………………………….10
3.4Measuring things in heaven by things on “earth”: Critique of empiricism……..11
3.5Knowing good by evil: Milton’s dialectics…………………………………… .12
IV.Justify God’s way: Milton’s theology……………………………………...13
4.1 Defy th’Ominipotent to arms: Satun’s sin……………………...........................14
4.2 Sad Exdusim: the Fall…...…………………………………...............................15
4.3Image of thee in all things: Milton’s Arianism…………………………………..16
V .Conclusion ………………………………………………….................................17
摘 要
弥而顿的失乐园，从诠释的角度看，是最复杂与有正义的文学作品之一，本文致力于一种阐释，试图通过分析他的“哲学方法”以一种更清晰的方式重构他的观点。弥而顿生活在封建主义像资本主义过渡的时期，此时期被马克思形容为“代谢断裂”。这造成他与传统相比较，思想上的范式转换。我将通过例举出诗句为例研究。第一，弥而顿在宇宙背景下对劳动异化过程的展示：比较马克思1844年手稿。第二，弥而顿的物化批判：比较卢卡奇的：历史与阶级意识。第三，弥而顿对概念与事物，语言界限的认识：比较“维特根斯坦哲学”。第四，弥而顿对经验主义的批判：比较德国唯心主义哲学传统。第五，弥而顿的辩证法：比较黑格尔“精神现象学”。我重构了他对几个著名神学命题的处理 ，我试图展示他把撒旦之罪首先看作一种现象界对本体之道的僭越，同时他的堕落与放逐应被视为一种黑格尔式的辩证过程.
关键词: 哲学方法；物化批判；语言；经验主义；辩证法
Abstract
Milton’s “Paradise lost”has always been of one of the most complicated and controversial literature works in its interpretation. This paper is devoted to an interpretation of it, by analysis of his“Philosophical methods”, to reconstruct some of his arguments in a more clarified way. Milton’s time was during the transformation from feudalism to caopitalism, which Marx termed “Metobolic rift”. This entails a shift of Paradigm in his way of thinking from tradition, which I diagnosed with quoted lines from his poetry. These include: 1. his presentation of alienation of labor in a cosmic context, compared with Marx’s 1844 manuscript; 2. Milton’s critique of fetishism, compared with Lukarc’s “History and class consciousness”; 3. Milton’ treatment between the “concept” and the “thing”, contingeacy of language, compared with theory of Wittgenstein; 4. Miltom’s critique of epiriticism, compared with works of German Idealists; 5. Milton’s dialectical method, compared with Hegel’s “Phenomonology of spirit”. I reconstructed a few of his theological trearments of famous themes. I try to show that he primarily posed Satan’s sin as a breach from limited “Phenomena” to the “Logos”, and the Fall should largely be seen as a process of Hegalian Alienation.
Key Words: Philosophical methods；critique of fetishism；language；critique of epiriticism；dialectical method
Bibliography
[1] Paradise Lost, John Milton, BARNE&NOBLE CLASSICS,New York
[2] The Cambridge companion to Milton 上海外语教育出版社 Dennis Danielsm编
[3] Milton, Political works,剑桥政治思想史原著系列（影印本）中国政法大学出版社
[4] Early works of German Romanticists, 同上
[5] Marx， Early political writtings, 同上
[6] Marx, Later political writtinds,同上
[7] German Idealism, 剑桥哲学指针（影印） 三联书店
[8] Wittgenstein，同上
[9] Hegel，同上
[10] “Structure of Scientific Revolution” Tomos kuhn(西学经典影印丛书)， 社会科学文献出版社
[11] 逻辑哲学论 维特根斯坦， 商务印书馆（汉译名著丛书）
[12] 1640年英国革命史 基佐，同上
[13] 精神现象学 黑格尔，同上
> 我来回应