In the 1920s, revolution, war, and imperialist aggression brought chaos to China. Many of the dramatic events associated with this upheaval took place in or near China's cities. Bound together by rail, telegraph, and a shared urban mentality, cities like Guangzhou, Shanghai, and Beijing formed an arena in which the great issues of the day--the quest for social and civil peace, ...
In the 1920s, revolution, war, and imperialist aggression brought chaos to China. Many of the dramatic events associated with this upheaval took place in or near China's cities. Bound together by rail, telegraph, and a shared urban mentality, cities like Guangzhou, Shanghai, and Beijing formed an arena in which the great issues of the day--the quest for social and civil peace, the defense of popular and national sovereignty, and the search for a distinctively modern Chinese society--were debated and fought over. People were drawn into this conflicts because they knew that the passage of armies, the marching of protesters, the pontificating of intellectual, and the opening and closing of factories could change their lives. David Strand offers a penetrating view of the old walled capital of Beijing during these years by examining how the residents coped with the changes wrought by itinerant soldiers and politicians and by the accelerating movement of ideas, capital, and technology. By looking at the political experiences of ordinary citizens, including rickshaw pullers, policemen, trade unionists, and Buddhist monks, Strand provides fascinating insights into how deeply these forces were felt. The resulting portrait of early twentieth-century Chinese urban society stresses the growing political sophistication of ordinary people educated by mass movements, group politics, and participation in a shared, urban culture that mixed opera and demonstrations, newspaper reading and teahouse socializing. Surprisingly, in the course of absorbing new ways of living, working, and doing politics, much of the old society was preserved--everything seemed to change and yet little of value was discarded. Through tumultuous times, Beijing rose from a base of local and popular politics to form a bridge linking a traditional world of guilds and gentry elites with the contemporary world of corporatism and cadres.
来源:Journal of Asian History , 1991, Vol. 25, No. 1 (1991), pp. 99-100 http://www.jstor.com/stable/41930813 译文仅供学术参考 史谦德对1920年代北京政治的叙述是复杂而令人信服的,但他这部著作的意义并不限于其妙笔之下的地方景象。《北京的人力车夫》同样成功地向研...
(展开)
史谦德(David Strand)用精妙的架构、流畅且生动地分析了1920年代大混乱时期北京的社会与政治。由于缺少官方档案,作者主要使用了报刊材料,以及陶孟和、李景汉和甘博(Sidney D. Gamble)撰写的社会调查报告。他从人力车夫入手展开研究,这是一种在1870-1940年间的东亚社会中...
(展开)
史谦德(David Strand),美国狄金森学院查尔斯·A.德纳(Charles A. Dana)政治学教授,1979年获美国哥伦比亚大学博士学位,著有《北京的人力车夫:1920年代的市民与政治》《未竟的共和:近代中国的言行表率》等。《北京的人力车夫:1920年代的市民与政治》中译本近日由江苏人...
(展开)
0 有用 Simplicio 2022-06-29 07:17:47
20年代从京城降为北平、民生凋敝、社会动荡的大背景下的普通民众与日常政治,黄包车夫、警察、商会、行会、国民党部等的基层博弈,故事性不错,但叙述为主,论点不大清晰。可搭配读季剑青的书评和其引用的杜丽红的两篇较新论文。
0 有用 HomoMonstrosus 2018-03-07 23:55:17
故事会
0 有用 discourse 2014-02-26 13:45:53
Classic - David Strand on popular culture
1 有用 Bricoleur 2015-10-26 02:13:44
有趣的部分:1.)北京商会中资产阶级内部的阶级斗争;2.)五四知识分子对无产“阶级”的动员无力
2 有用 南池子 2018-06-16 19:10:56
第十一章谈到人力车夫与有轨电车之间的竞争