作者:
David Strand
/
史谦德 出版社: University of California Press 副标题: City People and Politics in the 1920s 出版年: 1993-4-27 页数: 388 定价: USD 33.95 装帧: Paperback ISBN: 9780520082861
In the 1920s, revolution, war, and imperialist aggression brought chaos to China. Many of the dramatic events associated with this upheaval took place in or near China's cities. Bound together by rail, telegraph, and a shared urban mentality, cities like Guangzhou, Shanghai, and Beijing formed an arena in which the great issues of the day--the quest for social and civil peace, ...
In the 1920s, revolution, war, and imperialist aggression brought chaos to China. Many of the dramatic events associated with this upheaval took place in or near China's cities. Bound together by rail, telegraph, and a shared urban mentality, cities like Guangzhou, Shanghai, and Beijing formed an arena in which the great issues of the day--the quest for social and civil peace, the defense of popular and national sovereignty, and the search for a distinctively modern Chinese society--were debated and fought over. People were drawn into this conflicts because they knew that the passage of armies, the marching of protesters, the pontificating of intellectual, and the opening and closing of factories could change their lives. David Strand offers a penetrating view of the old walled capital of Beijing during these years by examining how the residents coped with the changes wrought by itinerant soldiers and politicians and by the accelerating movement of ideas, capital, and technology. By looking at the political experiences of ordinary citizens, including rickshaw pullers, policemen, trade unionists, and Buddhist monks, Strand provides fascinating insights into how deeply these forces were felt. The resulting portrait of early twentieth-century Chinese urban society stresses the growing political sophistication of ordinary people educated by mass movements, group politics, and participation in a shared, urban culture that mixed opera and demonstrations, newspaper reading and teahouse socializing. Surprisingly, in the course of absorbing new ways of living, working, and doing politics, much of the old society was preserved--everything seemed to change and yet little of value was discarded. Through tumultuous times, Beijing rose from a base of local and popular politics to form a bridge linking a traditional world of guilds and gentry elites with the contemporary world of corporatism and cadres.
来源:Journal of Asian History , 1991, Vol. 25, No. 1 (1991), pp. 99-100 http://www.jstor.com/stable/41930813 译文仅供学术参考 史谦德对1920年代北京政治的叙述是复杂而令人信服的,但他这部著作的意义并不限于其妙笔之下的地方景象。《北京的人力车夫》同样成功地向研...
(展开)
史谦德(David Strand)用精妙的架构、流畅且生动地分析了1920年代大混乱时期北京的社会与政治。由于缺少官方档案,作者主要使用了报刊材料,以及陶孟和、李景汉和甘博(Sidney D. Gamble)撰写的社会调查报告。他从人力车夫入手展开研究,这是一种在1870-1940年间的东亚社会中...
(展开)
史谦德(David Strand),美国狄金森学院查尔斯·A.德纳(Charles A. Dana)政治学教授,1979年获美国哥伦比亚大学博士学位,著有《北京的人力车夫:1920年代的市民与政治》《未竟的共和:近代中国的言行表率》等。《北京的人力车夫:1920年代的市民与政治》中译本近日由江苏人...
(展开)
2 有用 南池子 2018-06-16 19:10:56
第十一章谈到人力车夫与有轨电车之间的竞争
0 有用 Sisyphbel 2025-03-26 02:06:49 美国
用老舍用的一絕.. 很值得借鑑 時代感(historiography wise and approach)明顯?
7 有用 功夫熊猫小碗熊 2016-02-24 13:45:49
不愧是黎安友弟子,写东西的工整无棱角,找派系和利益团体冲突的视角,简直一模一样。狂薅骆驼祥子和鲁迅的羊毛。北京/北平首都地位的频繁更易,军阀混乱与政权更替造成政府行政时常产生断裂,警察等新式管治系统依然有强烈的德政和人情色彩,商会和工会等团体的组织动员和沟通作用,街头游行和集会体现的政治议程和空间开放性,KMT在1920年代末还保留着一定的大众联系和动员能力。人力车夫作为一个群体,既是城市现代性展... 不愧是黎安友弟子,写东西的工整无棱角,找派系和利益团体冲突的视角,简直一模一样。狂薅骆驼祥子和鲁迅的羊毛。北京/北平首都地位的频繁更易,军阀混乱与政权更替造成政府行政时常产生断裂,警察等新式管治系统依然有强烈的德政和人情色彩,商会和工会等团体的组织动员和沟通作用,街头游行和集会体现的政治议程和空间开放性,KMT在1920年代末还保留着一定的大众联系和动员能力。人力车夫作为一个群体,既是城市现代性展开后贫民群体的代表,又由于能接触知识分子、小商人、老板等小资和中产群体,且在一定程度上为政治和商业(而非高度工业化的)都市提供廉价快捷交通方式,而有一定的议价能力和群体认同感,成为商会工会为代表的精英市民团体和警察为代表的国家治理机器外第三个政治参与团体。 (展开)
0 有用 HomoMonstrosus 2018-03-07 23:55:17
故事会
0 有用 Woody 2012-11-29 05:21:57
Beijing in the 1920s can be orderly and self-governed