出版社: Harvard University Press
副标题: With a New Introduction by the Author
出版年: 1996-9-1
页数: 224
定价: USD 32.00
装帧: Paperback
ISBN: 9780674576100
内容简介 · · · · · ·
Modern philosophy finds it difficult to give a satisfactory picture of the place of minds in the world. In "Mind and World", based on the 1991 John Locke Lectures, John McDowell offers his diagnosis of this difficulty and points to a cure. He illustrates a major problem of modern philosophy - the insidious persistence of dualism - in his discussion of empirical thought. Much as...
Modern philosophy finds it difficult to give a satisfactory picture of the place of minds in the world. In "Mind and World", based on the 1991 John Locke Lectures, John McDowell offers his diagnosis of this difficulty and points to a cure. He illustrates a major problem of modern philosophy - the insidious persistence of dualism - in his discussion of empirical thought. Much as we would like to conceive empirical thought as rationally grounded in experience, pitfalls await anyone who tries to articulate this position, and McDowell exposes these traps by exploiting the work of contemporary philosophers from Wilfrid Sellars to Donald Davidson. These difficulties, he contends, reflect an understandable - but surmountable - failure to see how we might integrate what Sellars calls "the logical space of reasons" into the natural world. What underlies this impasse is a conception of nature that has certain attractions for the modern age, a conception that McDowell proposes to put aside, thus circumventing these philosophical difficulties. By returning to a pre-modern conception of nature but retaining the intellectual advance of modernity that has mistakenly been viewed as dislodging it, he makes room for a fully satisfying conception of experience as a rational openness to independent reality. This approach also overcomes other obstacles that impede a generally satisfying understanding of how we are placed in the world.
作者简介 · · · · · ·
John McDowell is University Professor of Philosophy at the University of Pittsburgh.
原文摘录 · · · · · ·
喜欢读"Mind and World"的人也喜欢 · · · · · ·
Mind and World的书评 · · · · · · ( 全部 7 条 )
原作加导论的一点思考
韩林合:麦克道尔两种逻辑空间学说述评
韩林合:麦克道尔的两种自然学说述评
> 更多书评 7篇
这本书的其他版本 · · · · · · ( 全部3 )
-
中国人民大学出版社 (2014)8.4分 97人读过
-
中国人民大学出版社 (2006)7.5分 33人读过
以下书单推荐 · · · · · · ( 全部 )
- [个人]Readinglist Season 09-10 (伞保护协会)
- John Locke Lectures (IQ32)
- 现代哲学:分析 (济贫院长正太喵)
- 继续 (hkstehtstark)
- 唐热风老师推荐书目 (不神奇的满大人)
谁读这本书? · · · · · ·
二手市场
· · · · · ·
- 在豆瓣转让 有307人想读,手里有一本闲着?
订阅关于Mind and World的评论:
feed: rss 2.0
0 有用 Xiu 2022-06-04 18:29:31
对亚里士多德的正本清源、对“第二自然”和德国式“教化”的诉诸,都让我在很多时刻感到麦克道威尔是在理论哲学中做着列奥·施特劳斯在政治哲学中所做的同路人式的工作,结尾一转对“语言”的讨论更是如入海德格尔之境了。我想这部著作在一个深刻的意义上是黑格尔式的,分析哲学的技术性面孔背后掩藏着它作为哲学史中有待扬弃的环节这一事实。不过,作为bald naturalism入脑的现代人,见到麦克道威尔对“第二自然”... 对亚里士多德的正本清源、对“第二自然”和德国式“教化”的诉诸,都让我在很多时刻感到麦克道威尔是在理论哲学中做着列奥·施特劳斯在政治哲学中所做的同路人式的工作,结尾一转对“语言”的讨论更是如入海德格尔之境了。我想这部著作在一个深刻的意义上是黑格尔式的,分析哲学的技术性面孔背后掩藏着它作为哲学史中有待扬弃的环节这一事实。不过,作为bald naturalism入脑的现代人,见到麦克道威尔对“第二自然”作为一个“选项”的平白抛出,并且为了拒绝哲学焦虑而回避了辩护责任,在很多时候仍然让我感到怅然若失。 (展开)
2 有用 因扎吉 2015-11-11 01:23:39
1.Kantian insight: empirical knowledge is impossible without the combination between the understanding and the sensibility. So taken, the conceptual capacities already operated in experience, the emp... 1.Kantian insight: empirical knowledge is impossible without the combination between the understanding and the sensibility. So taken, the conceptual capacities already operated in experience, the empirical content is conceptual rather than the Given. So experience can play justificatory role. 2. The worry that drives some to appeal to the Given is (展开)
0 有用 viaggiatore 2022-01-18 20:19:05
老实说读到后面还是有点失望的,第一讲开了那么大的一个格局,最后却回避了作为第二自然的概念主动性究竟如何从(第一)自然中形成以及如何在接受性中运作的问题(后者正是康德在先验演绎中试图澄清的,麦兜用Bildung这个德语词简单带过,而他本人的维特根斯坦式回避在多大程度上合法也是存疑的)。另外很吃惊麦兜居然奇怪地从亚里士多德伦理学中寻找资源,因为phronesis明显不能直接对应understandin... 老实说读到后面还是有点失望的,第一讲开了那么大的一个格局,最后却回避了作为第二自然的概念主动性究竟如何从(第一)自然中形成以及如何在接受性中运作的问题(后者正是康德在先验演绎中试图澄清的,麦兜用Bildung这个德语词简单带过,而他本人的维特根斯坦式回避在多大程度上合法也是存疑的)。另外很吃惊麦兜居然奇怪地从亚里士多德伦理学中寻找资源,因为phronesis明显不能直接对应understanding,而如果考虑亚里士多德在DA中的立场,那么nous必然是separate的,即使不是ontologically至少也是notionally,这和麦兜主张的立场完全相反。 (展开)
6 有用 陈仪宝 2017-12-18 06:42:21
德国观念论终于在100年后借(麦兜的)维特根斯坦之手重回分析哲学。
0 有用 ophoebus 2017-09-15 22:03:55
以后一定得找个机会再读一遍。
0 有用 朝闻道 2024-01-05 03:35:57 山东
4.5星,可恶,上了动物心灵支持者的恶当:( 跟我说“麦克道认为杂多是一片漆黑(姑且当隐喻说法了,就是看不见吧),动物看到的不是杂多,证明动物是有概念能力的”,重读再次支持了我的印象,果然不是这样子的!
0 有用 ~ 2023-05-22 02:26:05 广东
终于读完,启发性大于其他优点,但是麦兜还是有一些基础的想法有待进一步澄清
0 有用 鲨布拉吉 2023-04-29 14:09:24 美国
标了Davidson也得标一下McDowell👍
0 有用 我们梦呓者 2023-04-23 12:49:21 北京
其实还是比较好读的,就是学康德一样车轱辘话来回说…
0 有用 momo 2023-04-17 01:58:26 陕西
很早以前就读过了,也算名著了。很难引用