Plato's distinction between the spectator and the actor coincides with his distinction between the ruler and the ruled. The ruler knows, intends yet not acts. For Kant, this seperation is to be overcome. Everyone, gifted by nature with the capacity to think and act, needs to assume the standpoints of both world-spectator (world citizen) and actor.
Unsatisfied. Is it enough to have lucid judgment without being able to act? How can we merely appreciate the greatness of historical events without conceding to the desperate urge of taking part in them? Is it good enough to have a clear conscience? Does it make sense if we don't act in accordance with our judgment? Can we ever escape doing evil?
作者: Hannah Arendt isbn: 0226025950 书名: Lectures on Kant's Political Philosophy 页数: 182 定价: USD 20.00 出版社: University of Chicago Press 装帧: Paperback 出版年: 1989-9-15
0 有用 Philex 2009-07-17 11:10:49
阿伦特的解析比较有争议，但个人觉得她提出的很多概念对全盘把握康德的政治哲学思想很有裨益。
0 有用 Alexayi 2016-04-24 02:32:09
exceptionally inspiring
1 有用 爬行钢炮 2016-04-19 01:08:00
阿伦特挖出了很多康德非政治哲学作品中的政治哲学脉络 一直被忽视但绝对不应该被忽视的一些观点 real大家风范 启发太多了 看完的那天激动得睡不着觉（说得好像我能有啥新发现一样……哎纯激动嘛
0 有用 唉呀，玫瑰糖 2013-06-06 17:14:55
只草草地翻阅了一下。留下的印象是：她对康德历史-政治哲学的理解，只是放在自己体系里解读的，而且没有看到康德历史-政治哲学最精华的部分。只是从现象上论，没有触及原理。
0 有用 Bernkastel 2014-03-31 20:04:43
今天男神还说，既然有人写阿伦特，不如下学期开康德？下学期都在法国了……schade
0 有用 Yinanaa 2022-06-06 20:39:29
Plato's distinction between the spectator and the actor coincides with his distinction between the ruler and the ruled. The ruler knows, intends yet not acts. For Kant, this seperation is to be overcome. Everyone, gifted by nature with the capacity to think and act, needs to assume the standpoints of both world-spectator (world citizen) and actor.
0 有用 TOGOKeats 2022-06-06 05:36:07
越发喜欢阿伦特！
0 有用 叙拉古芭比 2020-05-07 13:52:36
呃
1 有用 小游 2017-03-22 14:17:43
好看好玩。2017-03-22。看第二遍，可怕的是内容几乎不记得了。2018-01-22。这还属于看的很认真，一边写一边看的，更别说那些纯看没写的，估计都忘到九霄云外了。
0 有用 Lincredible#0 2021-03-28 09:06:06
Unsatisfied. Is it enough to have lucid judgment without being able to act? How can we merely appreciate the greatness of historical events without conceding to the desperate urge of taking part in them? Is it good enough to have a clear conscience? Does it make sense if we don't act in accordance with our judgment? Can we ever escape doing evil?
0 有用 明月胜 2020-02-15 01:48:08
补标（读于2019年春夏）阿伦特的这个讲稿写得挺有趣的，有如下几个问题。1）她试图从康德的第三批判中写出"康德自己也没来得及写出的政治哲学"，直接的结果就是她不得不进行大面积的重新阐释。她对于exemplarity的阐释是与康德南辕北辙的。2）一些哲学概念之间的关系有些模糊，比如imagination和common sense之间的关系，虽然借用了康德的cognitive faculty，但它们都是被重新阐释的。3）和多数人一样（如哈贝马斯，Bryan) 所批判的一样，阿伦特的价值判断缺乏一个清晰的标准：极权主义的恶和丑陋似乎先决的。阿伦特认识到在二战后，欧洲的道德和价值标准需要重新定义，但她并没有说清楚我们如何锻炼判断力。Beiner的后文他的博士论文，他指出了阿伦特的一些问题。
0 有用 嘿哈嘿哈 2013-01-10 00:44:08
本书收录阿伦特在芝加哥大学教书期间解读康德政治哲学的讲课笔记，共十三篇。详见书评。
0 有用 DAVID 2019-09-12 12:33:08
第一次读secondary literature觉得这么牛逼
0 有用 Schönfließ 2021-08-25 18:34:41
精彩。似乎还没人处理好与50年代康德讲稿之间的张力。
0 有用 守穆仁 2022-03-21 05:37:58
@2014-02-11 07:50:47 @2021-07-02 04:30:16
0 有用 Vita Nova 2020-06-07 12:01:17
actor和spectator的视角如何结合仍然是难以解决的问题。