豆瓣
扫码直接下载
中文翻译逼得我去读英文版,结果看英文都比看中文顺了。
Blaug的争议不少,但是总体作为研究经济思想的参照是不错的,这本书有很多可以反驳的地方,也有不少精湛的地方。
应该是4.5?
"This is a bad, bad book," said Tony, my professor in HET. I think what Tony didn't like was this book's approach to lecture his readers on the interpretation of those classics.
> Economic Theory in Retrospect
1 有用 卖乐色的人贩子 2018-10-12 06:11:45
中文翻译逼得我去读英文版,结果看英文都比看中文顺了。
0 有用 gloria 2009-03-24 11:16:17
Blaug的争议不少,但是总体作为研究经济思想的参照是不错的,这本书有很多可以反驳的地方,也有不少精湛的地方。
0 有用 蒂洛 2010-12-06 05:44:40
应该是4.5?
0 有用 SuSo 2014-01-15 07:33:09
"This is a bad, bad book," said Tony, my professor in HET. I think what Tony didn't like was this book's approach to lecture his readers on the interpretation of those classics.