作者:
Victor Ieronim Stoichita 出版社: Cambridge University Press 副标题: An Insight into Early Modern Meta-Painting 译者:
Anne-Marie Glasheen 出版年: 1997-10-28 页数: 365 定价: GBP 75.00 装帧: Hardcover ISBN: 9780521433938
Victor Stoichita challenges the received ideas about the linear progression of Western painting, from the Renaissance, through Mannerism to the Baroque. Eschewing questions of style, he focuses instead on the painting as a framed, transportable, and marketable object that is a specifically modern artistic medium. Arguing that panel painting, from its origins in the Early Renais...
Victor Stoichita challenges the received ideas about the linear progression of Western painting, from the Renaissance, through Mannerism to the Baroque. Eschewing questions of style, he focuses instead on the painting as a framed, transportable, and marketable object that is a specifically modern artistic medium. Arguing that panel painting, from its origins in the Early Renaissance, was a 'self-aware image', Stoichita demonstrates that the artist and his art was often the theme of the painting. He also examines the mirror effect and other 'splitting' strategies such as the mise en abime and intertextual play. By analysing these modalities of self-reflection, Stoichita offers a new and unexpected view of a period and the art it produced once considered to have been definitively classified.
Introduction
Part I. The Surprised Eye
1. Embrasures
2. The birth of still-life as an intertextual process
3. Margins
Part II. The Inquiring Eye
· · · · · ·
(更多)
Introduction
Part I. The Surprised Eye
1. Embrasures
2. The birth of still-life as an intertextual process
3. Margins
Part II. The Inquiring Eye
4. Assemblage
5. The turning point of painting
6. The intertextual machine
Part III. The Methodical Eye
7. Paintings, maps and mirrors
8. Two images: the painter/the act of painting
9. The reversed painting
Notes
Bibliography
Index
· · · · · · (收起)
Qu'est-ce que la <mille et unième nuit>, sinon une sortie de l'ordre des nombres rationnels vers le trans-fini? Il n'en est pas moins significatif de remarquer que ce fut justement ce <un>, qui dépasse les <mille> comme chiffre rond, face auquel, les géometriques Déca-, Hepta- et Pentamérons européens se sont montrés timides, sinon rétifs. (查看原文)
0 有用 Edelirium 2017-09-27 14:33:03
不太记得了，只觉得当时对它批判居多
0 有用 Narrenturm 2013-12-04 03:53:56
has been a pleasure to read <3 <3 <3
0 有用 一汪清泓 2020-06-25 23:06:45
和巫鸿的重屏基本同时的书，这本应该更早一些。巫鸿的更通俗易懂，但这本对我影响更深。
0 有用 flow 2023-05-11 15:59:41 上海
窃以为艺术史写作不能这么自由散漫…..（也有可能是我太无知，反正黑话太多，概念挪用很不考究）。