216 pages | 3 halftones, 1 figure | 6 x 9 | © 2002
In this long-awaited book, David M. Halperin revisits and refines the argument he put forward in his classic One Hundred Years of Homosexuality: that hetero- and homosexuality are not biologically constituted but are, instead, historically and culturally produced. How to Do the History of Homosexuality expands on this view, updates it, answers its critics, and makes greater allowance for continuities in the history of sexuality. Above all, Halperin offers a vigorous defense of the historicist approach to the construction of sexuality, an approach that sets a premium on the description of other societies in all their irreducible specificity and does not force them to fit our own conceptions of what sexuality is or ought to be.
Dealing both with male homosexuality and with lesbianism, this study imparts to the history of sexuality a renewed sense of adventure and daring. It recovers the radical design of Michel Foucault's epochal work, salvaging Foucault's insights from common misapprehensions and making them newly available to historians, so that they can once again provide a powerful impetus for innovation in the field. Far from having exhausted Foucault's revolutionary ideas, Halperin maintains that we have yet to come to terms with their startling implications. Exploring the broader significance of historicizing desire, Halperin questions the tendency among scholars to reduce the history of sexuality to a mere history of sexual classifications instead of a history of human subjectivity itself. Finally, in a theoretical tour de force, Halperin offers an altogether new strategy for approaching the history of homosexuality—one that can accommodate both ruptures and continuities, both identity and difference in sexual experiences across time and space.
Impassioned but judicious, controversial but deeply informed, How to Do the History of Homosexuality is a book rich in suggestive propositions as well as eye-opening details. It will prove to be essential reading for anyone interested in the history of sexuality.
4 有用 云何不乐 2025-09-17 00:13:53 美国
对福柯的细读堪称典范(虽然作者很傲娇地说人家受福柯影响没有受新历史主义那么大呐,拜托,新历史主义代表格林布拉特都曾表示自己在ucb看见客座的福柯就好像看见光)。集子里让我受益最多的一篇是本书的同名论文,区分了作为现代性身份的同性恋与四种古典关系类别,即阴柔、少年爱、友谊和变态:阴柔在历史中主要同耽于酒色的直男挂钩;而同性友谊,尽管许多热烈互动被载入文字,但像“因为是他,因为是我”一类黏腻词句在当时... 对福柯的细读堪称典范(虽然作者很傲娇地说人家受福柯影响没有受新历史主义那么大呐,拜托,新历史主义代表格林布拉特都曾表示自己在ucb看见客座的福柯就好像看见光)。集子里让我受益最多的一篇是本书的同名论文,区分了作为现代性身份的同性恋与四种古典关系类别,即阴柔、少年爱、友谊和变态:阴柔在历史中主要同耽于酒色的直男挂钩;而同性友谊,尽管许多热烈互动被载入文字,但像“因为是他,因为是我”一类黏腻词句在当时话语脉络中,是被用来强调关系的平等,有意识地打消情欲想象——同性恋对友谊的继承在平等,不在情欲。意料之外情理之中的观点很多,但也有一些牵强的论证。像附录中为了证明少年爱是单向的,用陶器上的同性爱图释举例,1是硬的0是软的。我立刻想到好多GV里0都越干越软,后人是不是也能以此说明当代同性恋是单向的😹 (展开)
0 有用 电胆马 2024-10-13 02:12:03 加拿大
Forgetting Foucault
0 有用 无 2024-08-20 08:01:02 北京
写得超级清晰,十分易读。里面对福柯的分析远远好于我看过的几本专门写福柯的书