This book scientifically proved that nobody knows shits, basically the best way to win an argument is to nicely and politely ask your opponent to elaborate more into the issue until he or she realises the fact that nobody knows shit, its all just opinions based on pseudo tribal moral claims. Yet there is a way to transcend this, UTILITARIANISM
作者是Utilitarianism的激推🤣我虽然完全没有内置的moral compass但是也觉得实用。书最后推荐的让人解读概念的重置大法(Fernbach 2013)似乎是对IOED好用的对抗法。概念：Tragedy of the Commons, biased fairness, illusion of explanatory depth, Deep Pragmatism
道德议题之所以令人着迷部分原因在于它附着了个体与社会的各个层面：社会，国家，历史，文化，时间，个人动机，直觉反应，理性。正因为这样，Greene用功利主义的大旗构建的道德货币（moral currency）显得近乎突兀的简洁。如他讲，现代人面对道德问题要做的第一件事即think slower and harder。
Tribalism is the result of the cultural and biological evolution to serve survival purposes. moral standards we hold are what you feel is right within your tribe. seeking common grounds and using active thinking when faced with moral controversies are the practical steps to solve conflicts. Utilitarianism, impartiality and happiness, is the way
作者: Joshua Greene 副标题: Emotion, Reason, and the Gap Between Us and Them isbn: 1594202605 书名: Moral Tribes 页数: 432 定价: USD 29.95 出版社: The Penguin Press 装帧: Hardcover 出版年: 2013-10
4 有用 TimberNord 2017-01-26 11:12:30
This book scientifically proved that nobody knows shits, basically the best way to win an argument is to nicely and politely ask your opponent to elaborate more into the issue until he or she realises the fact that nobody knows shit, its all just opinions based on pseudo tribal moral claims. Yet there is a way to transcend this, UTILITARIANISM
0 有用 某然 2024-01-29 21:27:54 美国
作者是Utilitarianism的激推🤣我虽然完全没有内置的moral compass但是也觉得实用。书最后推荐的让人解读概念的重置大法(Fernbach 2013)似乎是对IOED好用的对抗法。概念：Tragedy of the Commons, biased fairness, illusion of explanatory depth, Deep Pragmatism
0 有用 wenwenm 2022-12-27 22:00:03 北京
总结一下中心思想：从生物学、心理学、哲学的角度论证了人类道德思考的“双工”模式，其中自动模式（外显为各类本能情感）源自进化论，用于维持道德部落内合作，但无法解决现代社会不同道德部落间的合作困境，因此在应对此类问题时，需切换至手动模式，寻求所谓元道德，即功利主义/深度实用主义。论证部分非常有趣，虽然对多大程度上可以解决现实问题表示怀疑。关于元道德，亚里士多德向美德求答案，但败于美德的局限。康德向理性求答案，但败于理性的局限。向人类生物性求答案的，最终是否也要败于生物本能（即“自动模式”带给我们）的局限？最后，这个世界需要实用主义者，但在自我认知的底线问题上，我需要我的理想国。
0 有用 中年直男 2023-04-24 01:40:02 美国
我对反复推翻电车问题毫无兴趣所以中间看的很烦 关于abortion的讨论非常精彩 还有conservatives反而有更广的对人性的包容这点
1 有用 gavin.j 2019-11-03 22:17:01
道德议题之所以令人着迷部分原因在于它附着了个体与社会的各个层面：社会，国家，历史，文化，时间，个人动机，直觉反应，理性。正因为这样，Greene用功利主义的大旗构建的道德货币（moral currency）显得近乎突兀的简洁。如他讲，现代人面对道德问题要做的第一件事即think slower and harder。
0 有用 老十八椒🌶 2019-04-15 05:18:40
Reading for assignments purpose...would recommend for those who are interested in utilitarianism and morality. Brilliant arguments in there
1 有用 企鹅同志 2016-04-25 22:42:06
用心理学揭示伦理学
0 有用 epiphany 2020-06-26 19:50:07
#39
0 有用 SuSo 2018-08-01 20:54:18
philosophically better version of psychologist...哲学部分可读singer的intro
0 有用 盛夏 2020-10-12 17:06:24
写得有些啰嗦，可以更精简一些。大脑的双加工机制，“自动模式”和“手动模式”。理性不只是事后的辩护，比Haidt（2012）乐观。
0 有用 neoscat 2020-05-30 12:45:44
Tribalism is the result of the cultural and biological evolution to serve survival purposes. moral standards we hold are what you feel is right within your tribe. seeking common grounds and using active thinking when faced with moral controversies are the practical steps to solve conflicts. Utilitarianism, impartiality and happiness, is the way