In the New Essays on Human Understanding, Leibniz argues chapter by chapter with John Locke's Essay Concerning Human Understanding, challenging his views about knowledge, personal identity, God, morality, mind and matter, nature versus nurture, logic and language, and a host of other topics. The work is a series of sharp, deep discussions by one great philosopher of the work of...
In the New Essays on Human Understanding, Leibniz argues chapter by chapter with John Locke's Essay Concerning Human Understanding, challenging his views about knowledge, personal identity, God, morality, mind and matter, nature versus nurture, logic and language, and a host of other topics. The work is a series of sharp, deep discussions by one great philosopher of the work of another. Leibniz's references to his contemporaries and his discussions of the ideas and institutions of the age make this a fascinating and valuable document in the history of ideas. The work was originally written in French, and the version by Peter Remnant and Jonathan Bennett, based on the only reliable French edition (published in 1962), first appeared in 1981 and has become the standard English translation. It has been thoroughly revised for this series and provided with a new and longer introduction, a chronology on Leibniz's life and career and a guide to further reading.
Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy(共50册),
这套丛书还有
《Hobbes and Bramhall on Liberty and Necessity》《Fear and Trembling》《Foundations of Natural Right》《Kant》《Malebranche》
等
。
喜欢读"New Essays on Human Understanding"的人也喜欢
· · · · · ·
and ...... 3) Leibniz's later stupid argumentations... Ya, ugly, really ugly that Russell once humiliated at, that I can hardly bare to open Bible to "Ecclesiastes 1:9~10", and "fire in the hole"...(n...and ...... 3) Leibniz's later stupid argumentations... Ya, ugly, really ugly that Russell once humiliated at, that I can hardly bare to open Bible to "Ecclesiastes 1:9~10", and "fire in the hole"...(no "amen" here)... (展开)
0 有用 #冇色# 2020-02-23 23:52:39
#Till#
0 有用 CurlyHairCat 2022-09-23 14:01:20 中国香港
Anyway, thanks for saving my essay🥹
0 有用 Anchi_Re 2021-09-28 21:48:14
and ...... 3) Leibniz's later stupid argumentations... Ya, ugly, really ugly that Russell once humiliated at, that I can hardly bare to open Bible to "Ecclesiastes 1:9~10", and "fire in the hole"...(n... and ...... 3) Leibniz's later stupid argumentations... Ya, ugly, really ugly that Russell once humiliated at, that I can hardly bare to open Bible to "Ecclesiastes 1:9~10", and "fire in the hole"...(no "amen" here)... (展开)
0 有用 Boxuan M. 2024-12-04 16:35:25 英国
以前写Innatism essay的时候都是站的你这边
2 有用 初繁言 2021-05-14 07:29:16
epstein: everyone should at a certain point be a logical positivist. me: everyone should at a certain point be a leibnizian.