This volume reflects Jacques Derrida's engagement in the late 1970s with French political debates on the teaching of philosophy and the reform of the French university system. He was a founding member of the Research Group on the Teaching of Philosophy (Greph), an activist group that mobilized opposition to the Giscard government's proposals to "rationalize" the French educational system in 1975, and a convener of the Estates General of Philosophy, a vast gathering in 1979 of educators from across France. While addressing specific contemporary political issues on occasion, thus providing insight into the pragmatic deployment of deconstructive analysis, the essays deal mainly with much broader concerns. With his typical rigor and spark, Derrida investigates the genealogy of several central concepts which any debate about teaching and the university must confront. Thus there are essays on the "teaching body," both the faculty "corps" and the strange interplay in the French (but not only the French) tradition between the mind and body of the professor; on the question of age in teaching, analyzed through a famous letter of Hegel; on the class, the classroom, and the socio-economic concept of class in education; on language, especially so-called "natural languages" like French; and on the legacy of the revolutionary tradition, the Estates General, in the university. The essays are linked by the extraordinary care and precision with which Derrida undertakes a political intervention into, and a philosophical analysis of, the institutionalization of philosophy in the university.
9 有用 非行少女神乃襞 2021-07-31 14:04:49
正如赠予的可能性本身就是那不可赠予的礼物一般,思想在越是追寻其自身的绝对地平就会越来越深地陷入自身的绝对不可能性之中,如果真的有所谓“哲学入门书”,那么这便是最好的,也是唯一的一本哲学入门书,我们不是对哲学知道的太少,而是知道的太多太多以至于把我们自身挡在了独属于自己的那扇哲学之门外了。
1 有用 Castor 2023-02-18 16:34:27 河北
德里达谈哲学、哲学教育与哲学机构。大多数文章读起来令人兴趣寥寥(也可能是我不关心那些问题),只有第一篇比较有趣,可以视作德里达对“什么是哲学”的回答——反对那些制度化的、对象化的东西,向着空无的远方呼唤思想在边界向外延伸(而这对于他而言,也不是什么新东西了)
0 有用 mioooy 2023-11-08 21:33:26 英国
不感兴趣,读困了