作者:
Jonathan Barnes 出版社: Oxford University Press 副标题: A Very Short Introduction 出版年: 2001-1-18 页数: 176 定价: USD 11.95 装帧: Paperback 丛书:Very Short Introductions ISBN: 9780192854087
The influence of Aristotle, the prince of philosophers, on the intellectual history of the West is second to none. In this book Jonathan Barnes examines Aristotle's scientific researches, his discoveries in logic and his metaphysical theories, his work in psychology and in ethics and politics, and his ideas about art and poetry, placing his teachings in their historical context...
The influence of Aristotle, the prince of philosophers, on the intellectual history of the West is second to none. In this book Jonathan Barnes examines Aristotle's scientific researches, his discoveries in logic and his metaphysical theories, his work in psychology and in ethics and politics, and his ideas about art and poetry, placing his teachings in their historical context.
（亚氏原文）
Snakes copulate by twining around one another; and they have no testicles and no penis, as I have already observed - no penis because they have no legs, no testicles ... because of their length. For because they are naturally elongated, if there were further delay in the region of the testicles, the semen would grow cool because of its slow passage. (This happens in the case of men who have large penises; they are less fertile than those with moderate penises because cold semen is not fertile and semen that is carried a long way cools.) (查看原文)
As a very short introduction, it’s an excellent introductory guidebook for Aristotle in every manner and aspects, with a very clear and fluent language.
Clear and fluent enough. Impressively, Barnes tended to identify A. first as a fact-collector/observer rather than an abstract thinker, who believed that any theory/knowledge comes from perception (th...Clear and fluent enough. Impressively, Barnes tended to identify A. first as a fact-collector/observer rather than an abstract thinker, who believed that any theory/knowledge comes from perception (though Barnes admitted A. as a systematic philosopher while failing to examine different parts of the world completely). (展开)
When it comes to Aristotle, it seems that you can hardly judge him within a few sentences. In much of the public opinion, Aristotle may be a great man. But if I continue to ask you, “do you really know what on earth did he do?” What will pop in your mind?...
(展开)
這本書是配合著另一本書《The Beginnings of Western Science》一起看的，主要是對亞里士多德的思想做一個補充。從内容的安排上來看，確實對於The Beginning一書中的内容是一個很好的補充，在對亞里士多德的宇宙學，實在論，變化，四因說，以及經驗論方面都有很不錯的補充，並...
(展开)
胡伍玄
译林出版社2013版
连城in花城
译林出版社2010版
戴着虚伪
月自黄昏水自安
译林出版社2010版
0 有用 文的 2013-03-20 19:54:23
简明扼要，点出重点难题，入门不错。
0 有用 Jegg 2019-02-25 08:19:28
诚恳地讲述了Aristotle as a zoological researcher, collecter of facts and info, and philosopher. Interesting to read!
1 有用 yihan爱书橱 2015-10-25 14:05:12
亚里士多德真是个全才！这本小小的同时读本介绍了他在哲学、科学、逻辑学等方面的诸多造诣。有时候一想到古人在技术条件那么简陋的年代都能做出这么多学问，就深感愧疚，觉得自己是在愧对这么好的外部条件。
0 有用 Sue 2012-11-28 09:47:56
Accessible and contemplative writing, highly recommended.
0 有用 戴着虚伪 2021-11-12 18:52:25
非英语专业的学生慎入！！！ 看完之后对亚里士多德真的有了天翻地覆的变化，发现以前的自己的认识太浅薄了，前前后后花了两个多月的时间看完了这本short introduction，很佩服自己。 原来觉得这本书仅仅是还行，现在看来还是值得一看的，毕竟是自己第一部读完的英文书！ 本书语言还是比较通俗的，给予了亚里士多德极高的评价，在亚里士多德逻辑和哲学方面的论述略难懂，其余没什么问题。
0 有用 Kidinthehole 2023-01-12 16:36:25 湖南
三刷，终于敢说自己和作者对上话了！一本Introduction都看了三年才“看懂”，这思维的阶梯啊...
0 有用 Link 2022-05-13 00:20:11
As a very short introduction, it’s an excellent introductory guidebook for Aristotle in every manner and aspects, with a very clear and fluent language.
0 有用 戴着虚伪 2021-11-12 18:52:25
非英语专业的学生慎入！！！ 看完之后对亚里士多德真的有了天翻地覆的变化，发现以前的自己的认识太浅薄了，前前后后花了两个多月的时间看完了这本short introduction，很佩服自己。 原来觉得这本书仅仅是还行，现在看来还是值得一看的，毕竟是自己第一部读完的英文书！ 本书语言还是比较通俗的，给予了亚里士多德极高的评价，在亚里士多德逻辑和哲学方面的论述略难懂，其余没什么问题。
0 有用 Nosferatu 2021-05-18 21:54:51
真的是very short
0 有用 一事无成Midum 2019-10-06 02:32:55
Clear and fluent enough. Impressively, Barnes tended to identify A. first as a fact-collector/observer rather than an abstract thinker, who believed that any theory/knowledge comes from perception (th... Clear and fluent enough. Impressively, Barnes tended to identify A. first as a fact-collector/observer rather than an abstract thinker, who believed that any theory/knowledge comes from perception (though Barnes admitted A. as a systematic philosopher while failing to examine different parts of the world completely). (展开)