These two volumes provide a translation of the philosophical works of Descartes, based on the best available Latin and French texts. They are intended to replace the only reasonably comprehensive selection of his works in English, by Haldane and Ross, first published in 1911. All the works included in that edition are translated here, together with a number of additional texts ...
These two volumes provide a translation of the philosophical works of Descartes, based on the best available Latin and French texts. They are intended to replace the only reasonably comprehensive selection of his works in English, by Haldane and Ross, first published in 1911. All the works included in that edition are translated here, together with a number of additional texts crucial for an understanding of Cartesian philosophy, including important material from Descartes' scientific writings. The result should meet the widespread demand for an accurate and authoritative edition of Descartes' philosophical writings in clear and readable modern English.
The Philosophical Writings of Descartes的创作者
· · · · · ·
I did try to anticipate this objection, but it is one which occurs so spontaneously to everyone that it is worthwhile replying to it at some length. So let me say first of all that the infinite, qua infinite, can in no way be grasped. But it can still be understood, in so far as we can clearly and distinctly understand that something is such that no limitations can be found in it, and this amounts to understanding clearly that it is infinite. (查看原文)
![[法国] 笛卡尔](https://img9.doubanio.com/img/author/medium/public/1502900845.95.jpg)
笛卡尔 作者
0 有用 Victorwang90 2024-12-14 23:12:41 四川
毕业论文记录
0 有用 刘一颓 2018-06-18 01:42:52
2018 Meditations; 2023 Principles of Philosophy
0 有用 炎武 2018-09-05 10:40:05
Meditations on First Philosophy.
0 有用 佐为 2023-04-19 13:58:20 上海
这些年来读的最多的书，除了利维坦第一部分就是沉思集了。指导原则基本也对照过。以前我以为霍布斯研究界把霍布斯笛卡尔化了，现在我才发现他俩在第一哲学和认识论上的相似仍然没有得到正确认识和理解。笛卡尔当然是个二元论者，但是也可以说他是个不彻底的机械论者和唯物论者（物理主义者）。而传统上的唯物论者霍布斯和传统上的唯心论者贝克莱之间的界限或许比我们想象的要小，可能仅需做点小小的反转即可完成。可能根本不存在后... 这些年来读的最多的书，除了利维坦第一部分就是沉思集了。指导原则基本也对照过。以前我以为霍布斯研究界把霍布斯笛卡尔化了，现在我才发现他俩在第一哲学和认识论上的相似仍然没有得到正确认识和理解。笛卡尔当然是个二元论者，但是也可以说他是个不彻底的机械论者和唯物论者（物理主义者）。而传统上的唯物论者霍布斯和传统上的唯心论者贝克莱之间的界限或许比我们想象的要小，可能仅需做点小小的反转即可完成。可能根本不存在后世哲学史所谓的经验论与唯理论之争这回事，当然围绕天赋观念的争论是真实存在的。 (展开)
0 有用 Bernkastel 2014-06-01 23:51:43
男神说有些段落应该能背下来