Preface
1. Introduction: The Problem of Capitalist Development and Democracy
2. Capitalist Development and Democracy: The Controversy
Comparative Historical and Cross-national Quantitative Research on Development and Democracy
Methodological Reflections
3. Capitalist Development and Democracy: A Theoretical Framework
· · · · · ·
(
更多)
Preface
1. Introduction: The Problem of Capitalist Development and Democracy
2. Capitalist Development and Democracy: The Controversy
Comparative Historical and Cross-national Quantitative Research on Development and Democracy
Methodological Reflections
3. Capitalist Development and Democracy: A Theoretical Framework
Democracy and its Relation to Social Inequality
Class Structures, Classes, and Class Organizations
State Structures and Democracy
Democracy and the Transnational Structures of Power
Comparative Research on Democracy in a New Framework
4. Advanced Capitalist Countries
Introduction
The Transition to Democracy in Europe: The Democratic Cases
Transition and Breakdown: The Authoritarian Cases
Democratic Development in Britain's Settler Colonies
Conclusion and Discussion
5. Latin America
The Argument
Conditions for Initial Democratization
Regime Transformations after Initial Democratization
Regime Transformations and Transnational Structures of Power
Conclusion
6. Central America and The Caribbean
Introduction
Caribbean and Central American Cases Compared
Variations within the English-speaking Caribbean
Conclusion
7. Conclusions and Reflections
Theoretical Assessment
Reflections
Appendix: Classification of Regimes
Notes
References
Index
· · · · · · (
收起)
3 有用 功夫熊猫小碗熊 2013-05-17 11:49:56
比较历史研究法代表作之一,内容庞杂。往往被以往学者忽略的国际政治和权力秩序也引入为变量之一,但在拉美等后发民主地区显得更重要。理论上是社民派和阶级分析,认为核心为政治参与扩大的民主制度,最重要推进者是资本主义发展下受压迫、要求政治权利和经济福利的工人阶级,其政治组织是公民社会的重要组成部分;中产阶级推进议会民主和分权制度后未必热心支持甚至反对工人阶级选举权。拉美案例值得关注,似乎引出比核心理论更深... 比较历史研究法代表作之一,内容庞杂。往往被以往学者忽略的国际政治和权力秩序也引入为变量之一,但在拉美等后发民主地区显得更重要。理论上是社民派和阶级分析,认为核心为政治参与扩大的民主制度,最重要推进者是资本主义发展下受压迫、要求政治权利和经济福利的工人阶级,其政治组织是公民社会的重要组成部分;中产阶级推进议会民主和分权制度后未必热心支持甚至反对工人阶级选举权。拉美案例值得关注,似乎引出比核心理论更深厚的论述。依附体系下如进口替代战略如引起农业快速商品化、削弱地主阶级,本国工业发展生成工业资产和工人阶级,反而是诱致民主的有利条件;但独立前未解决的边境和国家合法性问题易引起战争和军事强人当权,导致官僚威权主义,实是资产阶级实现工业现代化的强硬方式。多国即在特殊条件下经历民主和威权反复更迭崩溃 (展开)
1 有用 周沐君 2010-12-28 06:32:14
这本书是个综述,写得非常繁杂,在兼顾所有比较对象的同时要涵盖国际经济秩序、国家与公民社会的关系,以及公民社会本身的发展情况。但起码写得很详细。两个观点值得关注:1、真正推进民主化进程的是工人阶级而非中产阶级,后者在实现议会民主之后一般都是反对继续扩大参与面的。这个论点由三位作者的社会民主取向所决定;2、实现稳定的民主转型的关键在于保护精英阶层的利益。如果民主化的实现是以绝对剥夺精英阶层既得利益为前... 这本书是个综述,写得非常繁杂,在兼顾所有比较对象的同时要涵盖国际经济秩序、国家与公民社会的关系,以及公民社会本身的发展情况。但起码写得很详细。两个观点值得关注:1、真正推进民主化进程的是工人阶级而非中产阶级,后者在实现议会民主之后一般都是反对继续扩大参与面的。这个论点由三位作者的社会民主取向所决定;2、实现稳定的民主转型的关键在于保护精英阶层的利益。如果民主化的实现是以绝对剥夺精英阶层既得利益为前提的话,往往最终导致另一种暴政。要注意作用力与反作用力的问题。 (展开)
0 有用 Sisyphus 2011-11-02 00:46:17
the authors try to reconcile the methodological tension between comparative historical studies and quantitative cross-national studies by building up a "new" framework to analyze democratization and u... the authors try to reconcile the methodological tension between comparative historical studies and quantitative cross-national studies by building up a "new" framework to analyze democratization and using historical studies method to test large-number cases. (展开)
0 有用 莱茵的黄金 2010-01-06 20:45:39
Moore的修订版
0 有用 酷酷功仔 2024-05-22 11:04:53 上海
The middle classes were most in favor of full democracy where they were confronted with intransigent dominant classes and had the option of allying with a sizable working class. However, if they start... The middle classes were most in favor of full democracy where they were confronted with intransigent dominant classes and had the option of allying with a sizable working class. However, if they started feeling threatened by popular pressures under a democratic regime, they turned to support the imposition of an authoritarian alternative. (展开)
0 有用 酷酷功仔 2024-05-22 11:04:53 上海
The middle classes were most in favor of full democracy where they were confronted with intransigent dominant classes and had the option of allying with a sizable working class. However, if they start... The middle classes were most in favor of full democracy where they were confronted with intransigent dominant classes and had the option of allying with a sizable working class. However, if they started feeling threatened by popular pressures under a democratic regime, they turned to support the imposition of an authoritarian alternative. (展开)
3 有用 功夫熊猫小碗熊 2013-05-17 11:49:56
比较历史研究法代表作之一,内容庞杂。往往被以往学者忽略的国际政治和权力秩序也引入为变量之一,但在拉美等后发民主地区显得更重要。理论上是社民派和阶级分析,认为核心为政治参与扩大的民主制度,最重要推进者是资本主义发展下受压迫、要求政治权利和经济福利的工人阶级,其政治组织是公民社会的重要组成部分;中产阶级推进议会民主和分权制度后未必热心支持甚至反对工人阶级选举权。拉美案例值得关注,似乎引出比核心理论更深... 比较历史研究法代表作之一,内容庞杂。往往被以往学者忽略的国际政治和权力秩序也引入为变量之一,但在拉美等后发民主地区显得更重要。理论上是社民派和阶级分析,认为核心为政治参与扩大的民主制度,最重要推进者是资本主义发展下受压迫、要求政治权利和经济福利的工人阶级,其政治组织是公民社会的重要组成部分;中产阶级推进议会民主和分权制度后未必热心支持甚至反对工人阶级选举权。拉美案例值得关注,似乎引出比核心理论更深厚的论述。依附体系下如进口替代战略如引起农业快速商品化、削弱地主阶级,本国工业发展生成工业资产和工人阶级,反而是诱致民主的有利条件;但独立前未解决的边境和国家合法性问题易引起战争和军事强人当权,导致官僚威权主义,实是资产阶级实现工业现代化的强硬方式。多国即在特殊条件下经历民主和威权反复更迭崩溃 (展开)
0 有用 Sisyphus 2011-11-02 00:46:17
the authors try to reconcile the methodological tension between comparative historical studies and quantitative cross-national studies by building up a "new" framework to analyze democratization and u... the authors try to reconcile the methodological tension between comparative historical studies and quantitative cross-national studies by building up a "new" framework to analyze democratization and using historical studies method to test large-number cases. (展开)
1 有用 周沐君 2010-12-28 06:32:14
这本书是个综述,写得非常繁杂,在兼顾所有比较对象的同时要涵盖国际经济秩序、国家与公民社会的关系,以及公民社会本身的发展情况。但起码写得很详细。两个观点值得关注:1、真正推进民主化进程的是工人阶级而非中产阶级,后者在实现议会民主之后一般都是反对继续扩大参与面的。这个论点由三位作者的社会民主取向所决定;2、实现稳定的民主转型的关键在于保护精英阶层的利益。如果民主化的实现是以绝对剥夺精英阶层既得利益为前... 这本书是个综述,写得非常繁杂,在兼顾所有比较对象的同时要涵盖国际经济秩序、国家与公民社会的关系,以及公民社会本身的发展情况。但起码写得很详细。两个观点值得关注:1、真正推进民主化进程的是工人阶级而非中产阶级,后者在实现议会民主之后一般都是反对继续扩大参与面的。这个论点由三位作者的社会民主取向所决定;2、实现稳定的民主转型的关键在于保护精英阶层的利益。如果民主化的实现是以绝对剥夺精英阶层既得利益为前提的话,往往最终导致另一种暴政。要注意作用力与反作用力的问题。 (展开)
0 有用 莱茵的黄金 2010-01-06 20:45:39
Moore的修订版