Building Microservices (豆瓣)

作者: Sam Newman
出版社: O'Reilly Media
副标题: Designing Fine-Grained Systems
出版年: 2014-12
页数: 250
定价: USD 49.99
装帧: Paperback
ISBN: 9781491950357

豆瓣评分

7.9

65人评价

5星

23.1%
4星

52.3%
3星

20.0%
2星

4.6%
1星

0.0%

评价:

内容简介 · · · · · ·

Over the past 10 years, distributed systems have become more fine-grained. From the large multi-million line long monolithic applications, we are now seeing the benefits of smaller self-contained services. Heavy-weight, hard to change Service Oriented Architectures are not the answer; instead we are now seeing finer-grained systems consisting of collaborating microservices. Eas...

(展开全部)

作者简介 · · · · · ·

Sam Newman is a technologist at ThoughtWorks, where he currently splits his time between encouraging and sharing Innovation globally and helping design and build their internal systems. He has worked with a variety of companies in multiple domains around the world, often with one foot in the developer world, and another in the IT operations space. If you asked him what he does,...

(展开全部)

豆瓣成员常用的标签(共38个) · · · · · ·

架构分布式微服务计算机分布式系统软件工程编程系统架构

喜欢读"Building Microservices"的人也喜欢 · · · · · ·

: Release It!

: 实现领域驱动设计

: Redis in Action

: Web Development with Clojure

: Reactive Design Patterns

: Dependency Injection

: Growing Object-Oriented Software, ...

: Agile IT Organization Design

: The Programmer's Guide to Apach...

: Scala in Action

我来说两句

短评 · · · · · · ( 全部 30 条 )

Building Microservices的书评 · · · · · · (全部 8 条)

什么时候你不应该使用微服务

juvenxu 2016-06-26 22:32:03

最近几年我一直在微服务相关的工作，编码、学习模式、寻找并使用开源工具，到大会做分享…… 这本《微服务设计》我读起来还是有很多比较切身的感触的，这里记录下。首先这本书最后一章有一段说的特别好，“你越不了解一个领域，为服务找到合适的界限上下文就越难……服务的界... (1回应)

19有用 / 1没用人民邮电出版社2016版

组织架构和工程架构

小池·水 2016-04-24 15:37:08

> 如果你有四个小组开发编译器，那么你会得到一个四步编译器。这是《新黑客字典》的说法。另一种更学术化的说法是： > 任何组织在设计一套系统（广义概念上的系统）时，所交付的设计方案在结构上都与该组织的沟通架构保持一致。如果一个系统很大，以至于开发的它的人分...

5有用 / 2没用人民邮电出版社2016版

全面介绍微服务实践的一本好书

ginobefun 2017-03-29 17:17:19

1. 这本书全面系统的介绍了实践微服务的方方面面，包括构建、集成、分解、部署、测试、安全等； 2. 这本书虽然包含了一些实例，但是更多的是方法论，虽然有些人觉得这样有点泛泛而谈，但是我感觉现在微服务的实践已经非常多，而这本书站在一个更高的高度上让我们系统地认识到微...

0有用 / 0没用人民邮电出版社2016版

很有广度的一本介绍微服务的书

甲烷菌。 2017-02-26 16:59:43

本书是2016年出版的，英文版是2015年出版的，微服务算是比较新的一项技术（或思想）。本书以宏观的角度讲述了微服务的理论思想，从下面的目录架构也能看出来，作者在第2章用了一章的篇幅讲了微服务中的架构师角色。什么是微服务? 微服务如何寻找平衡? 如何测试？等等，这些问题...

0有用 / 0没用人民邮电出版社2016版

指路

七月天 2017-02-05 19:39:07

职业目标是架构师, 专注方向是分布式和微服务. 把这两点确定后, 微服务设计是我看的第一本关于微服务的书. 春节在家囫囵吞枣的刷了一半, 这两天回公司, 周末把它看完了, 算是对微服务有了一个概念性的了解吧. 这本书主要对微服务的定义, 服务架构演化, 服务建模, 服务的集成,...

0有用 / 0没用人民邮电出版社2016版

> 更多书评8篇

读书笔记 · · · · · · (共9篇)

我来写笔记

按有用程度
按页码先后
最新笔记

展开收起
第5章

透明 (达摩流浪者)

更大尺度上的重构
2015-12-06 22:23

更大尺度上的重构

推荐

回应 2015-12-06 22:23
展开收起
第10章

透明 (达摩流浪者)

I have seen many teams adopt a model of shared service ownership. I find this approach suboptimal...One key reason people move toward shared services is to avoid delivery bottlenecks. What if there is a large backlog of changes that need to be made in a single service?...There is another model that could work well for us, though.... 答案就是内部开源。
2015-12-08 15:02

I have seen many teams adopt a model of shared service ownership. I find this approach suboptimal...One key reason people move toward shared services is to avoid delivery bottlenecks. What if there is a large backlog of changes that need to be made in a single service?...There is another model that could work well for us, though....
答案就是内部开源。

推荐

回应 2015-12-08 15:02
展开收起
第10章

透明 (达摩流浪者)

康威法则的原文： Any organization that designs a system (defined more broadly here than just information systems) will inevitably produce a design whose structure is a copy of the organization’s communication structure.
2015-12-08 14:14

康威法则的原文：
Any organization that designs a system (defined more broadly here than just information systems) will inevitably produce a design whose structure is a copy of the organization’s communication structure.

推荐

回应 2015-12-08 14:14
展开收起
第7章

透明 (达摩流浪者)

两个测试工具： http://www.mbtest.org https://github.com/realestate-com-au/pact 跟Moco异曲同工。
2015-12-08 13:34

两个测试工具：
http://www.mbtest.org
https://github.com/realestate-com-au/pact
跟Moco异曲同工。

推荐

回应 2015-12-08 13:34

展开收起
第3页

Dexter.Yy (养膘期终于要结束了！)

The Antifragile Organization：http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=2499552 Netflix的猴子……
2014-05-08 13:58

The Antifragile Organization：http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=2499552 Netflix的猴子……

推荐

回应 2014-05-08 13:58
展开收起
第10章

透明 (达摩流浪者)

I have seen many teams adopt a model of shared service ownership. I find this approach suboptimal...One key reason people move toward shared services is to avoid delivery bottlenecks. What if there is a large backlog of changes that need to be made in a single service?...There is another model that could work well for us, though.... 答案就是内部开源。
2015-12-08 15:02

I have seen many teams adopt a model of shared service ownership. I find this approach suboptimal...One key reason people move toward shared services is to avoid delivery bottlenecks. What if there is a large backlog of changes that need to be made in a single service?...There is another model that could work well for us, though....
答案就是内部开源。

推荐

回应 2015-12-08 15:02
展开收起
第10章

透明 (达摩流浪者)

康威法则的原文： Any organization that designs a system (defined more broadly here than just information systems) will inevitably produce a design whose structure is a copy of the organization’s communication structure.
2015-12-08 14:14

康威法则的原文：
Any organization that designs a system (defined more broadly here than just information systems) will inevitably produce a design whose structure is a copy of the organization’s communication structure.

推荐

回应 2015-12-08 14:14
展开收起
第7章

透明 (达摩流浪者)

两个测试工具： http://www.mbtest.org https://github.com/realestate-com-au/pact 跟Moco异曲同工。
2015-12-08 13:34

两个测试工具：
http://www.mbtest.org
https://github.com/realestate-com-au/pact
跟Moco异曲同工。

推荐

回应 2015-12-08 13:34

展开收起
第10章

透明 (达摩流浪者)

I have seen many teams adopt a model of shared service ownership. I find this approach suboptimal...One key reason people move toward shared services is to avoid delivery bottlenecks. What if there is a large backlog of changes that need to be made in a single service?...There is another model that could work well for us, though.... 答案就是内部开源。
2015-12-08 15:02

I have seen many teams adopt a model of shared service ownership. I find this approach suboptimal...One key reason people move toward shared services is to avoid delivery bottlenecks. What if there is a large backlog of changes that need to be made in a single service?...There is another model that could work well for us, though....
答案就是内部开源。

推荐

回应 2015-12-08 15:02
展开收起
第10章

透明 (达摩流浪者)

康威法则的原文： Any organization that designs a system (defined more broadly here than just information systems) will inevitably produce a design whose structure is a copy of the organization’s communication structure.
2015-12-08 14:14

康威法则的原文：
Any organization that designs a system (defined more broadly here than just information systems) will inevitably produce a design whose structure is a copy of the organization’s communication structure.

推荐

回应 2015-12-08 14:14
展开收起
第7章

透明 (达摩流浪者)

两个测试工具： http://www.mbtest.org https://github.com/realestate-com-au/pact 跟Moco异曲同工。
2015-12-08 13:34

两个测试工具：
http://www.mbtest.org
https://github.com/realestate-com-au/pact
跟Moco异曲同工。

推荐

回应 2015-12-08 13:34
展开收起
第7章

透明 (达摩流浪者)

Test Journeys, Not Stories
2015-12-08 13:30

Test Journeys, Not Stories

推荐

回应 2015-12-08 13:30