Preface ix
Introduction 1
1. A Revolutionary Half Century 1
2. The Standard Narratives 7
3. Method 13
1 The Identity Crisis of Philosophy 15
1. Sources of the Crisis 15
2. Trendelenburg's Philosophia Perennis 19
3. Philosophy as Critique 22
4. Schopenhauer's Revival of Metaphysics 28
5. Rise and Fall of the Neo-Kantian Ideal 36
6. Eduard von Hartmann's Metaphysics of the Sciences 45
7. Dilthey and Worldviews 48
2 The Materialism Controversy 53
1. Context and Causes 53
2. The Controversy Begins: Wagner versus Vogt 56
3. Philosophical Struwwelpeter 62
4. The Bible of Materialism 70
5. Schopenhauer Enters the Fray 77
6. Czolbe's Sensualism 84
7. Friedrich Lange, Neo-Kantian and Materialist Manqué 89
3 The ignorabimus Controversy 97
1. Du Bois-Reymond's Speech: Content and Context 97
2. Hartmann's Defense of Metaphysics 104
3. The Materialist Position 108
4. Lange's Defense of Du Bois-Reymond 112
5. Nägeli's Methodological Materialism 116
6. Dilthey on the Virtues and Vices of Naturalism 120
7. A Mask and a Martyr 123
8. Haeckel's Last Stand 128
4 Trials and Tribulations of Clio 133
1. History as a Science 133
2. Historical Objectivity? 140
3. The Battle against Positivism 145
4. Positivist Misunderstandings of Historicism 154
5 The Pessimism Controversy 158
1. A Forgotten Controversy 158
2. Schopenhauer's Pessimism 161
3. The Neo-Kantian Crusade 166
4. Dühring on the Value of Life 172
5. Hartmann's Pessimism 184
6. Hartmann's Self-Defense 190
7. The Value of Work 194
8. Aesthetic Redemption 200
9. Love 207
Appendix: Two Forgotten Women Philosophers 217
Further Reading 221
Index 229
· · · · · · (
收起)
2 有用 半退瓣 2017-01-31 00:54:00
其实完整读完的就悲观主义论战那一章,越看越觉得那个论战比较无聊。
0 有用 Juvenalis 2015-06-24 20:40:53
历史主义一章。清简扼要。章末给出了一个简明的对覆盖律模型的反对。
0 有用 七厂长 2018-08-03 15:49:13
上学期给学生上课用的教材。作者明确表示自己的这部哲学史是不同于黑格尔和洛维特哲学史标准叙事的另一部哲学史,因此对于一些不被后人重视但在当时影响广泛的哲学流派与哲学争论给予了关注。虽然具体的论述显得深度不足,但对于想要了解这段时期德国哲学基本面貌的读者而言还是不错的指南。
0 有用 PEAR 2018-11-19 07:09:17
年度好书,通俗又全面地梳理了一下19世纪下半叶的哲学形态和热点问题。
1 有用 马狗Margo 2021-06-01 12:01:02
看完了一大半不想看了,就是研究本身远远优于研究内容的一本书。几个争论可能当时社会境遇下意义重大,今天回头看都挺没意思的...不出名的哲学家不出名都是有原因的,就真的没什么价值...