Ethical loneliness is the experience of being abandoned by humanity, compounded by the cruelty of wrongs not being heard. It is the result of multiple lapses on the part of human beings and political institutions that, in failing to listen well to survivors, deny them redress by negating their testimony and thwarting their claims for justice.
Jill Stauffer examines the root causes of ethical loneliness and how those in power revise history to serve their own ends rather than the needs of the abandoned. Out of this discussion, difficult truths about the desire and potential for political forgiveness, transitional justice, and political reconciliation emerge. Moving beyond a singular focus on truth commissions and legal trials, she considers more closely what is lost in the wake of oppression and violence, how selves and worlds are built and demolished, and who is responsible for re-creating lives after they are destroyed.
Stauffer boldly argues that rebuilding worlds and just institutions after violence is a broad obligation and that those who care about justice must first confront their own assumptions about autonomy, liberty, and responsibility before an effective response to violence can take place. In building her claims, Stauffer draws on the work of Emmanuel Levinas, Jean Améry, Eve Sedgwick, and Friedrich Nietzsche, as well as concrete cases of justice and injustice across the world.
1 有用 Schönfließ 2021-06-01 20:28:30
结论其实很简单:to cope with historical trauma with intersubjective method。文笔很好,故事讲得精彩,但结论并非多么有原创性,且缺乏有结构的论证,因此读起来并不像哲学专著而有点儿像心灵鸡汤。但最主要的问题是对于一些作者的引用并不和书本身的论点compatible,因此有强行appropriate之嫌:至少我实在是想不出Levinas的Othe... 结论其实很简单:to cope with historical trauma with intersubjective method。文笔很好,故事讲得精彩,但结论并非多么有原创性,且缺乏有结构的论证,因此读起来并不像哲学专著而有点儿像心灵鸡汤。但最主要的问题是对于一些作者的引用并不和书本身的论点compatible,因此有强行appropriate之嫌:至少我实在是想不出Levinas的Otherness或者尼采怎么可以最终落在intersubjective support上面。 (展开)