Lajos Ligeti
October 28, 1902 - May 24, 1987
Ligeti was born at the North Hungarian city, Balassagyarmat. After his secondary school years at Gyarmat, he gained admission to the Budapest József Eötvös College of great fame and French orientation. As a student of the Faculty of Arts in the University of Budapest he studied classical philology, and learned even more absorbedly Turkish philology and severe judgement from Gyula Németh, with whom the undergraduate dissected the works of great Vámbéry to false and true segment. He learned etymology, a passion to search for the Turkish elements of Hungarian language from Zoltán Gombocz. But he realized that at home he could not arrive at the final source of our relationship with, and beyond, the Turkish peoples, so after he took a Ph. D. degree with honours - then rewarded with an iron ring instead of the golden one of the pre-war time - he gladly went to Paris to be instructed by the great masters of Sorbonne. On a Hungarian scholarship, he studied Chinese subjects with Henri Maspéro, Tibetan philology - in the wake of Csoma de Kőrös - with Jacques Bacot, and first and foremost, the Mongolian and related fields with highly versatile Paul Pelliot, his most influential professor in Paris.
The metropolis urged him to stay, but he returned to Hungary, into unemployment. Eventually he managed to raise support for an expedition to China. In 1928-30 he visited the Mongols in the north between theGreat Wall and the Gobi Desert. He lived in lamaistic monasteries and studied the little known languages of southern and eastern Mongolians: Chahar, Harchin Tumet and Dagur, so important for its ancient pecularities. Most of his collection was destroyed during the Second World War, but his invaluableold Mongolian, Manchu, Tibetan and Chinese Manuscripts and books survived, which he gave to the Library of the Hungarian Academy as a gift. In his scholarly report (Rapport preliminaire..., 1933) he made mention of his inquiry into the 108-volume Mongolian Buddhist canon, which he was the first to describe as an immense source for linguistic, cultlral and historical research (Catalogue du Kanjur mongol imprimé, 1942-1944). In the autumn of 1936 he travelled to Afghanistan, where he sought out the Moghols, a people believed to have already vanished, and reported new data on their disappearing language. He also studied the folklore of the Uzbeks in Afghanistan. In the meantime he dicovered the correlation between the long vowels of old and contemporary Turkish languages.
From 1936 he was elected corresponding member of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences and an ordinary member from 1947. He was 37 when he became a professor of the Faculty of Arts in the University of Budapest and a year later he was appointed to the holder of the Chair of Inner Asia. He was the first to teach there Mongolian and Tibetan language and culture, Inner Asian history and Manchu, from the alphabet to many settled and unsettled quetions and to various complex methods of investigations. In addition to his own department, for twenty years, he also held the Chair of the Far East, where he taught the first generations of Hungarian sinologists. For several years he was in the Chair of Turkish philologyas well. Among others, he was also managing director of the Institute for Hungarian Studies.
He was the vice-president of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences for two decades. He was the founder of Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, so far the longest-lived of our journals devoted to Oriental studies; he edited the monograph series Bibliotheca Orientalis Hungarica in Europaean languages and that of the Csoma de Krös Pocket Library in Hungarian; he reorganized the Csoma de Krös Society, set up a research group under the aegis of the Academy to constitute a workshop for tacking the philological problems of Mongolian, Turkish, Manchu, Tungus and Inner Asian subjects. He initiated the teaching of Altaic subjects at Szeged University. He donated his private library of several thousand volumes to the library of Szeged University.
After his tour of Japan at the onset of the Second World War, from the late 40-s he travelled extensively, also to Mongolia and again to China, though for shorter times. He devoted most of his time left from his university and academy engagements to research. He probed into the history of the Mongolian, Turkish, Manchu, Tungus and Tibetan languages, literature and culture, published and interpreted sources, edited the Collection of Mongolian Written Monuments and the Mongolian Vocabulary of Istanbul, dechipered the Mongolian material in the Yemen Polyglot written in Arabic script, threw light on the principles and dechipherment of the Jurchi "small characters" and searched for the key to the Khitan language and writing.
He published in Hungarian and in foreign languages (first of all in his favourite French); he wrote for the narrow circle of connoisseurs and for all literate Hungarians in a wise, well- refined style. He translated the Secret History of the Mongols, the Tibetan Sa-skya pandita's Subhasitaratnanidhi into Hungarian. His last greatest work, The Early Turkish Relations of the Hungarian Language before the Conquest and during the rpád Dynasty - published in Hungarian - is good reading for experts and lay readers alike for all who are interested in the living linguistic proof of our relationships reaching as far as the easternmost corners of Inner Asia, and in the Hungarian prehistory in general.
He was a member of several scholarly associations abroad. Several Hungarian decorations and those of other countries acknowledged his endeavours in education, research, organization and the public life.
Kara György, Louis Ligeti, 1902-1987: AOH 41(1987) pp. 3-6.
1 有用 五明子 2016-06-25 17:41:14
可以写写李盖提跟孔网。。
0 有用 Nise 2016-04-21 15:28:41
可以读
0 有用 Duke 2020-08-01 22:13:29
读完了!还挺好看的
0 有用 潇湘公子 2025-04-08 17:11:10 重庆
伟大的杰作,深刻的描摹 以令人感动的笔触,细腻描摹了一个濒临灭绝的失范的、末世的、末人社会。 如此深刻,如此生动,如此残酷的,一个需要被毁灭的社会。 过去的统治秩序崩溃了,而古老的部落共同体秩序,古老的宗教共同体秩序被废弃已久,残存的自治能力和维持秩序的能力有限,而过去帝制的、编户其民的统治秩序的割草机毁灭了过去的传统自治能力,而新的统治秩序不再能够自我生存,只能依靠即将到来的列宁主义的更加爆... 伟大的杰作,深刻的描摹 以令人感动的笔触,细腻描摹了一个濒临灭绝的失范的、末世的、末人社会。 如此深刻,如此生动,如此残酷的,一个需要被毁灭的社会。 过去的统治秩序崩溃了,而古老的部落共同体秩序,古老的宗教共同体秩序被废弃已久,残存的自治能力和维持秩序的能力有限,而过去帝制的、编户其民的统治秩序的割草机毁灭了过去的传统自治能力,而新的统治秩序不再能够自我生存,只能依靠即将到来的列宁主义的更加爆裂的统治秩序,一个完全的末世社会。 (展开)
0 有用 velacciere 2025-08-05 14:29:15 江苏
本书记录了作者1928~1930年期间在中国内蒙古地区的考察。1928年,26岁的作者结束了在法国的留学生活,从马赛港启航向着东方出发,抵达上海后,经天津、北京然后进入内蒙古,沿途他住在寺院里(喇嘛庙)观察并记录周边人民的生活,当时的中国是什么样的呢,想起一句话是“旧的秩序被打破,新的秩序还未建立”。大致路径是北京—张家口—呼和浩特—朝阳—锦州—北京,一年后,当作者再次踏入“北京饭店”,舒适和清洁... 本书记录了作者1928~1930年期间在中国内蒙古地区的考察。1928年,26岁的作者结束了在法国的留学生活,从马赛港启航向着东方出发,抵达上海后,经天津、北京然后进入内蒙古,沿途他住在寺院里(喇嘛庙)观察并记录周边人民的生活,当时的中国是什么样的呢,想起一句话是“旧的秩序被打破,新的秩序还未建立”。大致路径是北京—张家口—呼和浩特—朝阳—锦州—北京,一年后,当作者再次踏入“北京饭店”,舒适和清洁,又一次回归他的生活。 (展开)