出版社: University Of Chicago Press
出版年: 2016-3-7
页数: 336
定价: USD 30.00
装帧: Paperback
ISBN: 9780226336626
内容简介 · · · · · ·
For the past twenty years, noted sociologist Andrew Abbott has been developing what he calls a processual ontology for social life. In this view, the social world is constantly changing—making, remaking, and unmaking itself, instant by instant. He argues that even the units of the social world—both individuals and entities—must be explained by these series of events rather than...
For the past twenty years, noted sociologist Andrew Abbott has been developing what he calls a processual ontology for social life. In this view, the social world is constantly changing—making, remaking, and unmaking itself, instant by instant. He argues that even the units of the social world—both individuals and entities—must be explained by these series of events rather than as enduring objects, fixed in time. This radical concept, which lies at the heart of the Chicago School of Sociology, provides a means for the disciplines of history and sociology to interact with and reflect on each other.
In Processual Sociology, Abbott first examines the endurance of individuals and social groups through time and then goes on to consider the question of what this means for human nature. He looks at different approaches to the passing of social time and determination, all while examining the goal of social existence, weighing the concepts of individual outcome and social order. Abbott concludes by discussing core difficulties of the practice of social science as a moral activity, arguing that it is inescapably moral and therefore we must develop normative theories more sophisticated than our current naively political normativism. Ranging broadly across disciplines and methodologies, Processual Sociology breaks new ground in its search for conceptual foundations of a rigorously processual account of social life.
Close
REVIEW QUOTES
Rogers Brubaker, University of California–Los Angeles
“Abbott has long been one of sociology’s most fertile and original thinkers. These lucid and challenging essays display Abbott’s remarkably wide-ranging sociological intelligence at its best. Cumulatively, they articulate the core principles of a distinctively processual sociology, and they challenge us to recognize the irreducibly humanistic and moral nature of the sociological enterprise.”
Paul DiMaggio, New York University
“Processual Sociology’s essays draw on a dizzying range of sources and examples, blended into a stunningly original, disruptive, and fecund analysis. The interrogation of such basic concepts as actor and outcome; the insights into the way that sequence and ecology frustrate causal reasoning; the effort to reconstitute macro-sociology on a radically micro-sociological foundation; and the reclamation of the moral dimension are just a few of this volume’s important themes. Processual Sociology is both a good read and an ambitious and compelling challenge to the way that social scientists understand and carry out their craft.”
Craig Calhoun, director, London School of Economics
“In Processual Sociology, Abbott makes clear that his ambition is to change sociology fundamentally. In elegant but also rigorous essays, he connects his seemingly disparate past writings and foreshadows a basic rethinking of social ontology. This starts from the historical character of individual life and moves on to connect historical demography to the nature of groups, the constant making and remaking of all cultural and social relationships, and the inextricable connection between the empirical and the moral. It is a brilliant book that makes one want to drop everything else to join in thinking about sociology’s hardest, most basic questions.”
Randall Collins, University of Pennsylvania
“Abbott is the most surprising and innovative of today’s social theorists, in part because he combines disciplines as diverse as mathematical philosophy and literary theory. His work cuts in an entirely different way across the quantitative/qualitative and most other divides. Abbott repeatedly reverses the gestalts, advocating a lyrical sociology of contemporaneous flows rather than narratives explaining ‘outcomes’ abstracted from time, proposing that more is explained by problems of excess than problems of scarcity, and exposing concepts of inequality that run contrary to what we do in our own lives. This is a book to change the way sociologists think.”
作者简介 · · · · · ·
Andrew Abbott is the Gustavus F. and Ann M. Swift Distinguished Service Professor at the University of Chicago. He edits the American Journal of Sociology.
喜欢读"Processual Sociology"的人也喜欢 · · · · · ·
Processual Sociology的书评 · · · · · · ( 全部 4 条 )
> 更多书评 4篇
论坛 · · · · · ·
在这本书的论坛里发言这本书的其他版本 · · · · · · ( 全部3 )
-
北京师范大学出版社 (2022)9.0分 179人读过
-
University Of Chicago Press (2016)暂无评分 2人读过
以下书单推荐 · · · · · · ( 全部 )
- 人文社科方法论:兼批判(3) (🦉的瓦涅密)
- 科学哲学与研究方法之间 (@~@)
- 社会理论读本 (曳尾于涂)
- 城乡社会学 (王荣欣)
- 书单 | Non-Fiction 9.0+ (Sheryl)
谁读这本书? · · · · · ·
二手市场
· · · · · ·
- 在豆瓣转让 有429人想读,手里有一本闲着?
订阅关于Processual Sociology的评论:
feed: rss 2.0
7 有用 makzhou 2019-11-04 17:59:30
我相信许多年之后我还会不断回到这个文本里,因为其中遍布各种珍宝,让人流连忘返。不过今天终于可以稍有自信:这本书读完了。正如AA自己说的,这本书的理论写作与他的实践高度一致:这是一个不断流动的思考过程里的一个断面。第三章直接脱胎于《职业系统》,第九章和尾声直接接上今年在Sociological Theory上关于涂尔干的论文。30多年的理论思考构成一个高度一致的取向,惊人。
1 有用 鸿蒙太空 2018-12-03 09:34:08
Finally, the debate between agency and structure has been ended. Yet ecology seems like a rabbit hole which only appreciated by Chicago School sociologists. Ch.4 lyrical sociology vs. narrative sociol... Finally, the debate between agency and structure has been ended. Yet ecology seems like a rabbit hole which only appreciated by Chicago School sociologists. Ch.4 lyrical sociology vs. narrative sociology battle is really cool, so as the rival between sociology (final outcomes comes from the state of the trajectory) and economists lives in the now. (展开)
2 有用 丁白 2023-04-07 20:05:09 上海
原版+中译都读了部分,最有启发的还是关于结果的讨论(点结果/趋势结果/过渡结果)。实际上social dynamics考虑无穷次迭代的性质,或许便是研究趋势结果(性质推导)与过渡结果(具体数值仿真)的模式。这个insight大概会被我纳入研究想法+构造更严格的版本… ps:关于human nature的讨论也很重要(将其视为一种变动缓慢的stability),或许可以澄清从“经济人”/“社会人”... 原版+中译都读了部分,最有启发的还是关于结果的讨论(点结果/趋势结果/过渡结果)。实际上social dynamics考虑无穷次迭代的性质,或许便是研究趋势结果(性质推导)与过渡结果(具体数值仿真)的模式。这个insight大概会被我纳入研究想法+构造更严格的版本… ps:关于human nature的讨论也很重要(将其视为一种变动缓慢的stability),或许可以澄清从“经济人”/“社会人”乃至神经科学机制下对个体的种种假设之缘由 (展开)
1 有用 老爹 2023-01-29 20:32:04 上海
很困惑,不是很清楚手头这本书在讲什么,或者更准确地说是,我究竟在读什么;也很难说提供了什么实质启发。具体地说,最核心的historicality of individual的主张,除了提出一种历史生成模型外,不知作者还为他赋予了什么其他意义。或许和文章来源与形式有关,书中对很多理论维度的区分显得粗糙。序列性究竟应当被理解为行动决定链条还是意义决定链条,这个问题似乎没有被触及,可相关的澄清当是至关重... 很困惑,不是很清楚手头这本书在讲什么,或者更准确地说是,我究竟在读什么;也很难说提供了什么实质启发。具体地说,最核心的historicality of individual的主张,除了提出一种历史生成模型外,不知作者还为他赋予了什么其他意义。或许和文章来源与形式有关,书中对很多理论维度的区分显得粗糙。序列性究竟应当被理解为行动决定链条还是意义决定链条,这个问题似乎没有被触及,可相关的澄清当是至关重要的。 (展开)
1 有用 耳虫 2020-02-19 23:25:23
本体论的部分配合time matters阅读。
0 有用 Ammonoid 2024-06-15 19:30:50 北京
我还是更喜欢前半部分的讨论。相较White,这时期的AA不把网络节点视作identities而是conjunctures从而释放了历史性/编码的灵活性,对于他想尝试的问题即构建一种奠基于时间性的内演本体论的确是更经济的。后半程对规范性的讨论偶有灵光但实在不是他的舒适区,他此阶段也对涂尔干进行了断章取义性的解读。然而即便如此,AA还是领先于当前版本的社会学,且看当今认知科学/深度学习/心灵哲学对表征... 我还是更喜欢前半部分的讨论。相较White,这时期的AA不把网络节点视作identities而是conjunctures从而释放了历史性/编码的灵活性,对于他想尝试的问题即构建一种奠基于时间性的内演本体论的确是更经济的。后半程对规范性的讨论偶有灵光但实在不是他的舒适区,他此阶段也对涂尔干进行了断章取义性的解读。然而即便如此,AA还是领先于当前版本的社会学,且看当今认知科学/深度学习/心灵哲学对表征问题的关注就可以看到他想问题的切入点比较刁钻(褒义)。我最近正在撰写的文章则讨论他这条进路实际上与晚期布迪厄对disposition的刻画是出于同一本体性关切,而根本性的歧见完全出于他们如何看待规范性问题(绝不像AA自己讨论他与布差异的那样简单)。 (展开)
0 有用 Leeze_ 2023-10-29 22:32:03 北京
个人比结构更具有连续性。(好多没读懂还需要再看
2 有用 丁白 2023-04-07 20:05:09 上海
原版+中译都读了部分,最有启发的还是关于结果的讨论(点结果/趋势结果/过渡结果)。实际上social dynamics考虑无穷次迭代的性质,或许便是研究趋势结果(性质推导)与过渡结果(具体数值仿真)的模式。这个insight大概会被我纳入研究想法+构造更严格的版本… ps:关于human nature的讨论也很重要(将其视为一种变动缓慢的stability),或许可以澄清从“经济人”/“社会人”... 原版+中译都读了部分,最有启发的还是关于结果的讨论(点结果/趋势结果/过渡结果)。实际上social dynamics考虑无穷次迭代的性质,或许便是研究趋势结果(性质推导)与过渡结果(具体数值仿真)的模式。这个insight大概会被我纳入研究想法+构造更严格的版本… ps:关于human nature的讨论也很重要(将其视为一种变动缓慢的stability),或许可以澄清从“经济人”/“社会人”乃至神经科学机制下对个体的种种假设之缘由 (展开)
1 有用 老爹 2023-01-29 20:32:04 上海
很困惑,不是很清楚手头这本书在讲什么,或者更准确地说是,我究竟在读什么;也很难说提供了什么实质启发。具体地说,最核心的historicality of individual的主张,除了提出一种历史生成模型外,不知作者还为他赋予了什么其他意义。或许和文章来源与形式有关,书中对很多理论维度的区分显得粗糙。序列性究竟应当被理解为行动决定链条还是意义决定链条,这个问题似乎没有被触及,可相关的澄清当是至关重... 很困惑,不是很清楚手头这本书在讲什么,或者更准确地说是,我究竟在读什么;也很难说提供了什么实质启发。具体地说,最核心的historicality of individual的主张,除了提出一种历史生成模型外,不知作者还为他赋予了什么其他意义。或许和文章来源与形式有关,书中对很多理论维度的区分显得粗糙。序列性究竟应当被理解为行动决定链条还是意义决定链条,这个问题似乎没有被触及,可相关的澄清当是至关重要的。 (展开)
1 有用 耳虫 2020-02-19 23:25:23
本体论的部分配合time matters阅读。