The new edition of Beauty and Misogyny revisits and updates Sheila Jeffreys' uncompromising critique of Western beauty practice and the industries and ideologies behind it. Jeffreys argues that beauty practices are not related to individual female choice or creative expression, but represent instead an important aspect of women's oppression. As these practices have become incre...
The new edition of Beauty and Misogyny revisits and updates Sheila Jeffreys' uncompromising critique of Western beauty practice and the industries and ideologies behind it. Jeffreys argues that beauty practices are not related to individual female choice or creative expression, but represent instead an important aspect of women's oppression. As these practices have become increasingly brutal and pervasive, the need to scrutinize and dismantle them is if anything more urgent now as it was in 2005 when the first edition of the book was published.
The United Nations concept of "harmful traditional/cultural practices" provides a useful lens for the author to advance her critique. She makes the case for including Western beauty practices within this definition, examining their role in damaging women's health, creating sexual difference and enforcing female deference.
First-wave feminists of the 1970s criticized pervasive beauty regimes such as dieting and depilation, but a later argument took hold that beauty practices were no longer oppressive now that women could "choose" them. In recent years the reality of Western beauty practices has become much more bloody and severe, requiring the breaking of skin and the rearrangement or amputation of body parts. Beauty and Misogyny seeks to make sense of why beauty practices have not only persisted but become more extreme. It examines the pervasive use of makeup, the misogyny of fashion and high-heeled shoes, and looks at the role of pornography in the creation of increasingly popular beauty practices such as breast implants, genital waxing, surgical alteration of the labia and other forms of self-mutilation. The book concludes by considering how a culture of resistance to these practices can be created.
A new and thoroughly updated edition of this essential work will appeal to all levels of students and teachers of gender studies, cultural studies and feminist psychology, and to anyone with an interest in feminism, women and beauty, and women's health.
Sheila Jeffreys is Professor in the School of Social and Political Sciences at the University of Melbourne, where she teaches sexual politics and international feminist politics. Before coming to Melbourne in 1991, she was active in the Women’s Liberation Movement in the UK from 1973, campaigning against pornography and violence against women, and in lesbian feminist politics. ...
Sheila Jeffreys is Professor in the School of Social and Political Sciences at the University of Melbourne, where she teaches sexual politics and international feminist politics. Before coming to Melbourne in 1991, she was active in the Women’s Liberation Movement in the UK from 1973, campaigning against pornography and violence against women, and in lesbian feminist politics. In Australia she is involved in the Coalition Against Trafficking in Women. She has written nine books on the history and politics of sexuality.
The effect of the cultural turn on feminist ideas about beauty is three-fold. Women are seen as having choice and agency in relation to beautypractices, or even being empowered by them. Women are represented as having the power to "play"*with beauty practices because instead of beingoppressive they can now be reinterpreted as fun.
*酷儿理论家对Judith Butler曲解。 (查看原文)
读到后几章我觉得把女性追求美的行为,如打扮,减肥,改造身体(cutting up women这一章),视为男性压迫下徒劳和自恋的subordinate pleasure有失偏颇。追求美的一部分是勇敢而自决的,不全是被动的、受害者式的。想象的自我是不一定完全是“性”的,不一定是有害的,反而是波伏娃主张的“自我选择”和“自我设计创造”,是自由的。
PDF版本:https://pan.quark.cn/s/7154cd2ef0ba 女人穿高跟鞋往往会导致疼痛、残疾、甚至永久的畸形。这种在西方社会中持续存在的、有害的文化习俗需要一些解释。《脚和鞋的性生活》( The Sex Life of the Foot and Shoe) 被誉为男性恋足者的圣经,作者 William Rossi 为了证明...
(展开)
31 有用 幻觉灯笼 2022-03-03 16:56:27
看了如此振聋发聩的书还能搁那儿整波老师的自由选择,书算是读了个屁
9 有用 0000 2020-07-16 08:47:24
读到后几章我觉得把女性追求美的行为,如打扮,减肥,改造身体(cutting up women这一章),视为男性压迫下徒劳和自恋的subordinate pleasure有失偏颇。追求美的一部分是勇敢而自决的,不全是被动的、受害者式的。想象的自我是不一定完全是“性”的,不一定是有害的,反而是波伏娃主张的“自我选择”和“自我设计创造”,是自由的。
1 有用 Aleksei Guba 2022-05-27 17:50:24
建议无水之池池主跪着读