Turks Across Empires tells the story of the pan-Turkists, Muslim activists from Russia who gained international notoriety during the Young Turk era of Ottoman history. Yusuf Akçura, Ismail Gasprinskii and Ahmet Agaoglu are today remembered as the forefathers of Turkish nationalism, but in the decade preceding the First World War they were known among bureaucrats, journalists and government officials in Russia and Europe as dangerous Muslim radicals. This volume traces the lives and undertakings of the pan-Turkists in the Russian and Ottoman empires, examining the ways in which these individuals formed a part of some of the most important developments to take place in the late imperial era.
James H. Meyer draws upon a vast array of sources, including personal letters, Russian and Ottoman state archival documents, and published materials to recapture the trans-imperial worlds of the pan-Turkists. Through his exploration of the lives of Akçura, Gasprinskii and Agaoglu, Meyer analyzes the bigger changes taking place in the imperial capitals of Istanbul and St. Petersburg, as well as on the ground in central Russia, Crimea and the Caucasus.
Turks Across Empires focuses especially upon three developments occurring in the final decades of empire: an explosion in human mobility across borders, the outbreak of a wave of revolutions in Russia and the Middle East, and the emergence of deeply politicized forms of religious and national identity. As these are also important characteristics of the post-Cold War era, argues Meyer, the events surrounding the pan-Turkists provide valuable lessons regarding the nature of present-day international and cross-cultural geopolitics
1 有用 韦衡 2024-06-13 23:59:24 江苏
顺便补标,三年前写本科thesis时热衷于border-crossing/mobility/extraterritoriality/contact zone/int’l law/transnational intellectual communities这些概念,犹记阅读本书时的欣赏。现在我想说,这类足以在不同区域操作复现的法律-思想史写作模版手法,对colonialism所带来的epistemi... 顺便补标,三年前写本科thesis时热衷于border-crossing/mobility/extraterritoriality/contact zone/int’l law/transnational intellectual communities这些概念,犹记阅读本书时的欣赏。现在我想说,这类足以在不同区域操作复现的法律-思想史写作模版手法,对colonialism所带来的epistemic ruptures&violence of paradigmatic knowledge的认识是不够的,所以结论只能急转而下在non-Western experience里复写dominant categories of knowledge——“不,我们是在’复杂化’叙事”,来自历史学家的抗辩。 (展开)
1 有用 milletsiz 2017-10-17 23:14:15
identity freelancers.
2 有用 обломовист 2019-01-23 01:12:29
精致但硬货和创新性都有限的研究。以一批出身于俄国、活跃于俄土两大帝国之间的“pan-turkists”生平为主线。作者试图避免从目的论视角写一种特定身份认同的形成,而是将其下放到帝国晚期的具体历史情境中,写他们的具体诉求是如何随时代而变化、自身是如何为时代所塑造的
0 有用 平大相国清盛公 2025-06-06 02:54:42 湖北
差点没给我气晕过去🙃帝俄这傻福程度不爆真对不起自己🤣1860之后拦绿外润的来了。本书叙述主体是三个路径相似的鞑靼知识分子,对应克里木、喀山和外高加索三个区块,也各有其子区域特色。Jadid和新方法教学的思路都是来自奥斯曼,也聘用了不少跨国者,很多都是未经批准的非法新校。伊提法克这种大篷车一碰zz议题就分裂碎掉,这些支持革新、俄化与近代化的人也逐渐同更底层绿虫且们的诉求发生乖离,同时圣彼得堡官方也在... 差点没给我气晕过去🙃帝俄这傻福程度不爆真对不起自己🤣1860之后拦绿外润的来了。本书叙述主体是三个路径相似的鞑靼知识分子,对应克里木、喀山和外高加索三个区块,也各有其子区域特色。Jadid和新方法教学的思路都是来自奥斯曼,也聘用了不少跨国者,很多都是未经批准的非法新校。伊提法克这种大篷车一碰zz议题就分裂碎掉,这些支持革新、俄化与近代化的人也逐渐同更底层绿虫且们的诉求发生乖离,同时圣彼得堡官方也在施加同化与标准化压力。阿克楚拉三个政策思路泛奥泛绿泛突当今都有体现,1905发表的时候没什么影响。加斯普林斯基的通用突厥语方案主要还是基于自己出身,对差异甚大的伏尔加鞑靼没什么吸引力。就该一股脑把这些蠹虫都赶出去,闹麻,现在死灰蓬勃复燃拼命挖罗刹契丹雅利安三家墙脚属实呵呵💧 (展开)
0 有用 人间别久不成悲 2025-05-09 00:58:41 新疆
《U Nation》姐妹篇。俄罗斯的穆斯林影响东土(Jadid),奥斯曼的穆斯林影响俄罗斯、波斯(伊朗)——伴随民族国家风潮出现的Pan-Turkic认同因为没有历史实体与积淀以及战争原因昙花一现,同时也给突厥(系)人民提出了一个“老问题”:我首先是突厥人还是穆斯林?