From the best-selling author of Why We Get Fat, a groundbreaking, eye-opening exposé that makes the convincing case that sugar is the tobacco of the new millennium: backed by powerful lobbies, entrenched in our lives, and making us very sick.
Among Americans, diabetes is more prevalent today than ever; obesity is at epidemic proportions; nearly 10% of children are thought to ha...
From the best-selling author of Why We Get Fat, a groundbreaking, eye-opening exposé that makes the convincing case that sugar is the tobacco of the new millennium: backed by powerful lobbies, entrenched in our lives, and making us very sick.
Among Americans, diabetes is more prevalent today than ever; obesity is at epidemic proportions; nearly 10% of children are thought to have nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. And sugar is at the root of these, and other, critical society-wide, health-related problems. With his signature command of both science and straight talk, Gary Taubes delves into Americans' history with sugar: its uses as a preservative, as an additive in cigarettes, the contemporary overuse of high-fructose corn syrup. He explains what research has shown about our addiction to sweets. He clarifies the arguments against sugar, corrects misconceptions about the relationship between sugar and weight loss; and provides the perspective necessary to make informed decisions about sugar as individuals and as a society.
作者简介
· · · · · ·
GARY TAUBES is the author of Why We Get Fat and Good Calories, Bad Calories. He is a former staff writer for Discover and a correspondent for the journal Science. His writing has appeared in The New York Times Magazine, The Atlantic, and Esquire, and has been included in numerous “Best of” anthologies, including The Best of the Best American Science Writing (2010). He has recei...
GARY TAUBES is the author of Why We Get Fat and Good Calories, Bad Calories. He is a former staff writer for Discover and a correspondent for the journal Science. His writing has appeared in The New York Times Magazine, The Atlantic, and Esquire, and has been included in numerous “Best of” anthologies, including The Best of the Best American Science Writing (2010). He has received three Science in Society Journalism Awards from the National Association of Science Writers. He is the recipient of a Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Investigator Award in Health Policy Research and a co-founder of the Nutrition Science Initiative (NuSI). He lives in Oakland, California.
同学老婆给的..随手翻了下..这书是个大杂烩什么都扯了几个段落..比如TR和sugar..冰激凌产业等，然后拼凑成的速读品。我感觉这种美式出版物一般都是半真半假了..it contains sth to be useful..but it is NOT entirely credible..尤其是本书讲diabetic的部分。很好奇这作者拿的是哪里的sponsorship? 作为读者我们其实没有条...同学老婆给的..随手翻了下..这书是个大杂烩什么都扯了几个段落..比如TR和sugar..冰激凌产业等，然后拼凑成的速读品。我感觉这种美式出版物一般都是半真半假了..it contains sth to be useful..but it is NOT entirely credible..尤其是本书讲diabetic的部分。很好奇这作者拿的是哪里的sponsorship? 作为读者我们其实没有条件知道吧。好几年前邻居给了一套书..很精美..作者有7个..我随口问他..某作者为啥会选择tackle某某领域..老头笑笑...某犹太人资助的..否则谁会费力气写这么一本书...但这些信息好像不会明晃晃披露吧。(展开)
一勺勺糖，是甜蜜还是负担？ 糖是古老的调味品，从生物学角度来看，糖还是人类的重要能量来源。但是过量食用糖也会带来很多烦恼，根据美国糖尿病协会的数据，2012年美国的糖尿病人已经占总人口的9.3%。美国科普作家 Gary Taubes 在新书《审判白糖》（The Case Against Sugar）...
(展开)
菩妖妖
机械工业出版社2018版
简慢人生
机械工业出版社2018版
大小小小小小黄
机械工业出版社2018版
不差楼的小学生
机械工业出版社2018版
lrain
幸运草001
机械工业出版社2018版
阿娅2019
机械工业出版社2018版
1 有用 凪 酱 * 2017-01-12 02:47:29
一本糖的进化史。理论背景很丰富，写得却像是一本小说。如果你还不知道糖的危害，值得一读。如果你有相关的研究，那就随便读读吧。Sweeping theories, but only partially credible.
0 有用 脱氧核糖十三 2019-04-10 23:14:11
平装版的封面明明那么好看！
1 有用 ZZ 2017-06-01 00:11:45
一部糖的历史，并不给出结论，因为结论在每个人的手中。少吃，吃植物，少糖。
1 有用 早睡大王 2022-01-30 21:53:28
又臭又长😅科学原理解释得太多了，论据和内容也没有有机整合，条理性不够，很多堆砌然后强行点题。不过也有一些方面的新知识，比如香烟含天然和添加糖，比如所有non-industrialized societites在接受了西方/现代化生活方式以后人口得病的分布都向西方靠拢，甚至是以更快的速度，debunk了关于基因优势/劣势的myth。结论和很多论据我都知道，但这么听一遍还是再次引起了重视并且真的开始戒... 又臭又长😅科学原理解释得太多了，论据和内容也没有有机整合，条理性不够，很多堆砌然后强行点题。不过也有一些方面的新知识，比如香烟含天然和添加糖，比如所有non-industrialized societites在接受了西方/现代化生活方式以后人口得病的分布都向西方靠拢，甚至是以更快的速度，debunk了关于基因优势/劣势的myth。结论和很多论据我都知道，但这么听一遍还是再次引起了重视并且真的开始戒糖了，所以这本书听得还是很有收益的 (展开)
0 有用 麦麦 2024-02-29 12:38:50 上海
所以理由是啥 补充一下，这么说是因为作者自己一些理论依据就是模糊不清的，导致观点也不是特别站得住。
0 有用 麦麦 2024-02-29 12:38:50 上海
所以理由是啥 补充一下，这么说是因为作者自己一些理论依据就是模糊不清的，导致观点也不是特别站得住。
1 有用 早睡大王 2022-01-30 21:53:28
又臭又长😅科学原理解释得太多了，论据和内容也没有有机整合，条理性不够，很多堆砌然后强行点题。不过也有一些方面的新知识，比如香烟含天然和添加糖，比如所有non-industrialized societites在接受了西方/现代化生活方式以后人口得病的分布都向西方靠拢，甚至是以更快的速度，debunk了关于基因优势/劣势的myth。结论和很多论据我都知道，但这么听一遍还是再次引起了重视并且真的开始戒... 又臭又长😅科学原理解释得太多了，论据和内容也没有有机整合，条理性不够，很多堆砌然后强行点题。不过也有一些方面的新知识，比如香烟含天然和添加糖，比如所有non-industrialized societites在接受了西方/现代化生活方式以后人口得病的分布都向西方靠拢，甚至是以更快的速度，debunk了关于基因优势/劣势的myth。结论和很多论据我都知道，但这么听一遍还是再次引起了重视并且真的开始戒糖了，所以这本书听得还是很有收益的 (展开)
0 有用 GW_Parables 2020-12-22 18:01:45
同学老婆给的..随手翻了下..这书是个大杂烩什么都扯了几个段落..比如TR和sugar..冰激凌产业等，然后拼凑成的速读品。我感觉这种美式出版物一般都是半真半假了..it contains sth to be useful..but it is NOT entirely credible..尤其是本书讲diabetic的部分。很好奇这作者拿的是哪里的sponsorship? 作为读者我们其实没有条... 同学老婆给的..随手翻了下..这书是个大杂烩什么都扯了几个段落..比如TR和sugar..冰激凌产业等，然后拼凑成的速读品。我感觉这种美式出版物一般都是半真半假了..it contains sth to be useful..but it is NOT entirely credible..尤其是本书讲diabetic的部分。很好奇这作者拿的是哪里的sponsorship? 作为读者我们其实没有条件知道吧。好几年前邻居给了一套书..很精美..作者有7个..我随口问他..某作者为啥会选择tackle某某领域..老头笑笑...某犹太人资助的..否则谁会费力气写这么一本书...但这些信息好像不会明晃晃披露吧。 (展开)
0 有用 farewell 2020-09-03 09:35:54
信息量大，不枯燥。
0 有用 脱氧核糖十三 2019-04-10 23:14:11
平装版的封面明明那么好看！