The tyrannies of sexual normativity have been widely denounced in queer theory. Heteronormativity, homonormativity, family values, marriage, and monogamy have all been objects of sustained queer critique, most often in purely oppositional form: as antinormativity. The contributors to this special issue ask a seemingly simple question of this critical code: can queer theory proceed without a primary allegiance to antinormativity? These essays offer an affirmative answer either by rethinking normativity or eschewing it altogether in order to redirect the intellectual and political energies of the field.
3 有用 Cory 2018-10-18 14:40:19
differences15年的特辑,反思作为酷儿理论核心信念的antinormativity,编者导言以Antinormativity's Queer Conventions的矛盾修辞为题,出版后遭到Duggan、Halberstam的尖锐反击。在后批判转向的语境里、以及在Ronell事件后重访这场论战,读出了不少新意思。
2 有用 吃点麦片 2021-12-17 21:52:51
简单来说就是尝试想象一种在对立/反抗之外的政治。批评酷儿研究一味迷恋“反常规”却很少去深入厘清“常规”本身是什么,忽视思考norms本身的复杂、弹性、包容。很多地方(尤其是聊数学的)还是很尴尬且简化,但欣赏作者的勇气。