In 1957, the Soviets launched Sputnik, the world's first satellite, into space. At the turn of the twenty-first century, more than eight thousand satellites orbited the Earth. Enabling pictures of the whole planet, simultaneous live broadcasts to people on different continents, and much more, satellites have fundamentally reconfigured understandings of ourselves in relation to others around the world and our planet in relation to the cosmos. In "Cultures in Orbit", Lisa Parks analyzes different uses of satellite television in order to rethink the meanings of and relations between television and 'the global.' In the process, she shows that the many convergences between televisual and satellite technologies necessitate an expanded definition of 'television' - one encompassing military monitoring, public education, and scientific observation as well as commercial entertainment and public broadcasting.Roaming across the disciplines of media studies, geography, and science and technology studies, Parks examines specific uses of satellites by broadcasters, archaeologists, military intelligence officers, and astronomers. She looks at the first live international television broadcast, which reached five hundred million viewers in twenty-four countries in 1967, and Imparja TV, an Aboriginal satellite TV network in Australia. Turning to satellites' remote sensing capabilities, she explores the U.S. military's production of satellite images of the war in Bosnia as well as archaeologists' use of satellite imagery in the excavation of Cleopatra's palace in Alexandria, Egypt.Parks' reflections on how Western fantasies of control are implicated in the Hubble telescope's observations of outer space point to a broader concern she highlights: that while satellite television creates a 'global village,' it also cuts and divides the planet in ways that extend the cultural and economic hegemony of the post-industrial West.
0 有用 函数 2022-02-18 17:44:26
导言很有启发性选的case角度也很新颖
0 有用 indigentsapien 2023-09-18 10:35:54 加拿大
第五章,另类现代宇宙大作
0 有用 村头的Randall 2021-05-01 18:00:36
物 的重要性并不高
0 有用 Penumbra 2025-02-21 04:08:12 加拿大
只读了c3 写得很好诶!需要把c4-5也看了才能完全了解Parks对于the problematic correspondence between obital vision and objective observer of the Enlightenment的批评! 从Jameson1995 Parks2005 到更晚近的TK和FA都在强调Aesthetics 让我觉得现在还做这个研究角度是不... 只读了c3 写得很好诶!需要把c4-5也看了才能完全了解Parks对于the problematic correspondence between obital vision and objective observer of the Enlightenment的批评! 从Jameson1995 Parks2005 到更晚近的TK和FA都在强调Aesthetics 让我觉得现在还做这个研究角度是不是太没创意了... (展开)
2 有用 满月様 2018-01-24 08:04:57
据说MIT非常财大气粗把Lisa Parks从ucsb挖了过去,我还蛮喜欢她在研究对象上的脑洞的……最后一章讲哈勃望远镜的,果然大家现在都开始追着外太空跑了wwwww