Can one explain the power of global capitalism without attributing to capital a logic and coherence it does not have? Can one account for the powers of techno-science in terms that do not merely reproduce its own understanding of the world?
Rule of Experts examines these questions through a series of interrelated essays focused on Egypt in the twentieth century. These explore the way malaria, sugar cane, war, and nationalism interacted to produce the techno-politics of the modern Egyptian state; the forms of debt, discipline, and violence that founded the institution of private property; the methods of measurement, circulation, and exchange that produced the novel idea of a national "economy," yet made its accurate representation impossible; the stereotypes and plagiarisms that created the scholarly image of the Egyptian peasant; and the interaction of social logics, horticultural imperatives, powers of desire, and political forces that turned programs of economic reform in unanticipated directions.
Mitchell is a widely known political theorist and one of the most innovative writers on the Middle East. He provides a rich examination of the forms of reason, power, and expertise that characterize contemporary politics. Together, these intellectually provocative essays will challenge a broad spectrum of readers to think harder, more critically, and more politically about history, power, and theory.
1 有用 韦衡 2021-10-20 12:08:55
此书精彩到我读至凌晨五点仍不愿放下,再去找找其他关于law, property and colonialism的著作。
0 有用 sillykoala 2011-02-15 02:20:53
Another view in revealing the discourse of development.
3 有用 水草狗 2018-07-31 22:06:10
社科才子书,但备考期间时间有限,只能囫囵吞枣不求甚解了。一手牵波兰尼脱嵌传统,一手接Callon经济化议题,讨论埃及19-20世纪经济范畴(尤其是土地产权)的形成,如何既嵌入于尼罗河谷独特的社会议程和治理需求,又作为独特的力量塑造了现代埃及的地缘地位。一章一个主题,但不同主题之间又相互照应。文风真是草蛇灰线,汪洋肆意……
0 有用 Donald 2013-12-24 05:10:25
就个人而言,前三章最有趣味,也最细密,用了两周才看完。最后三章期望最高,写得却像无趣政论。算是历史学家里,对于经济学这一概念钻研最为有趣的一位了罢,可沿着他的脉络再走下去,就得读Foucault,Derrida,Simmel或Bruno等艰深怪物了,怕怕....先去海边晒太阳了。
4 有用 易又饕 2013-12-18 19:22:46
此书让我基本理解了articulate这个单词的意思,这是最大的收获。除此之外,对于这类将概念和知识本身作为研究对象的后现代作品,我虽然可以慢慢学着欣赏,但至今为止还没有真正喜欢上。关键问题还是那个,总觉得这些东西善于打破一个旧框架,而不善于为它打破的这个旧框架寻找更好的替代物,每每想到这里,就觉得这些研究很象牙塔,虽然精致,但总有些乏味。