Collaboration among organizations is rapidly becoming common in scientific research as globalization and new communication technologies make it possible for researchers from different locations and institutions to work together on common projects. These scientific and technological collaborations are part of a general trend toward more fluid, flexible, and temporary organizational arrangements, but they have received very limited scholarly attention. Structures of Scientific Collaboration is the first study to examine multi-organizational collaboration systematically, drawing on a database of 53 collaborations documented for the Center for History of Physics of the American Institute of Physics. By integrating quantitative sociological analyses with detailed case histories, Shrum, Genuth, and Chompalov pioneer a new and truly interdisciplinary method for the study of science and technology. Scientists undertake multi-organizational collaborations because individual institutions often lack sufficient resources--including the latest technology--to achieve a given research objective. The authors find that collaborative research depends on both technology and bureaucracy; scientists claim to abhor bureaucracy, but most collaborations use it constructively to achieve their goals. The book analyzes the structural elements of collaboration (among them formation, size and duration, organization, technological practices, and participant experiences) and the relationships among them. The authors find that trust, though viewed as positive, is not necessarily associated with successful projects; indeed, the formal structures of bureaucracy reduce the need for high levels of trust--and make possible the independence so valued by participating scientists.Wesley Shrum is Professor of Sociology at Louisiana State University and longtime Secretary of the Society for Social Studies of Science (4S). Joel Genuth, a former Project Historian at the American Institute of Physics, teaches mathematics to incarcerated juveniles at the Hampshire Educational Collaborative in Massachusetts. Ivan Chompalov is Assistant Professor of Sociology at Edinboro University of Pennsylvania.
0 有用 makzhou 2024-06-26 06:30:22 美国
2.5星。还算是有意思的研究,利用American Institute of Physics的档案来研究科学合作是怎么产生的。微观数据的部分还有大约600人的访谈。要说是org研究也算,把档案编码,然后聚类分析,辅以个案来说明这些类别的有效性。类别只能说乏善可陈,论点接近与大道理”Our central argument is that an understanding of modern sci... 2.5星。还算是有意思的研究,利用American Institute of Physics的档案来研究科学合作是怎么产生的。微观数据的部分还有大约600人的访谈。要说是org研究也算,把档案编码,然后聚类分析,辅以个案来说明这些类别的有效性。类别只能说乏善可陈,论点接近与大道理”Our central argument is that an understanding of modern scientific collaborations requires close consideration of the shaping roles of technology and bureaucracy.“ 然后理论章节的逻辑就能体现出整本书的价值。 (展开)