"The innovative essays in this volume . . . demonstrat[e] the potential of the perspective of the affects in a wide range of fields and with a variety of methodological approaches. Some of the essays . . . use fieldwork to investigate the functions of affects--among organized sex workers, health care workers, and in the modeling industry. Others employ the discourses of microbiology, thermodynamics, information sciences, and cinema studies to rethink the body and the affects in terms of technology. Still others explore the affects of trauma in the context of immigration and war. And throughout all the essays run serious theoretical reflections on the powers of the affects and the political possibilities they pose for research and practice."--Michael Hardt, from the foreword In the mid-1990s, scholars turned their attention toward the ways that ongoing political, economic, and cultural transformations were changing the realm of the social, specifically that aspect of it described by the notion of affect: pre-individual bodily forces, linked to autonomic responses, which augment or diminish a body's capacity to act or engage with others. This "affective turn" and the new configurations of bodies, technology, and matter that it reveals, is the subject of this collection of essays. Scholars based in sociology, cultural studies, science studies, and women's studies illuminate the movement in thought from a psychoanalytically informed criticism of subject identity, representation, and trauma to an engagement with information and affect; from a privileging of the organic body to an exploration of nonorganic life; and from the presumption of equilibrium-seeking closed systems to an engagement with the complexity of open systems under far-from-equilibrium conditions. Taken together, these essays suggest that attending to the affective turn is necessary to theorizing the social. "Contributors." Jamie "Skye" Bianco, Grace M. Cho, Patricia Ticineto Clough, Melissa Ditmore, Ariel Ducey, Deborah Gambs, Karen Wendy Gilbert, Greg Goldberg, Jean Halley, Hosu Kim, David Staples, Craig Willse, Elizabeth Wissinger, Jonathan R. Wynn
9 有用 Eco 2018-05-09 09:26:30
Affective turn,一言以蔽之:对身体、物质与技术的重新形构。Hardt序言主要梳理了Affect在Spinoza意义上(身心关系问题)的起源,最后他还不忘说说自己的affective-labor。Hardt毕竟是一个搞政治哲学的,他对affect在艺术中的巨大潜力竟然一笔带过……所以这本书的副标题是theorizing the social。相比这本书的编者Patricia,《The ... Affective turn,一言以蔽之:对身体、物质与技术的重新形构。Hardt序言主要梳理了Affect在Spinoza意义上(身心关系问题)的起源,最后他还不忘说说自己的affective-labor。Hardt毕竟是一个搞政治哲学的,他对affect在艺术中的巨大潜力竟然一笔带过……所以这本书的副标题是theorizing the social。相比这本书的编者Patricia,《The Neuro-Image 》的Patricia更加接近Deleuze论述的affect。所以,斯宾诺莎-加塔利-马苏米-哈特是“the political of affect”一路的,而德勒兹才真正发现了affect在艺术中的巨大潜力。 (展开)
3 有用 党员福柯 2015-09-30 00:27:30
慎选,一半的文章都挺实验性的,不是自传体就是纯理论,对熵理论那套实在接受无能。剩下一半的文章还是要基于情感劳动这一经验切入点,然后看脑洞开到多大。Hardt的前言言简意赅,交代了affective turn在Spinoza脉络上的起源以及他自己affective labour概念的双重意涵,点出了非物质类符码、信息、观念、图像对于情感能力及政治可能性的影响。
4 有用 蝴蝶飞噜 2018-03-19 16:53:21
正文一點沒看,就快速瀏覽找關鍵句了...陸揚寫了一篇《“情感轉向”的理論資源》,比較易懂
0 有用 Adynamia 2015-10-13 12:27:37
只有三篇文章值得一读
0 有用 七斤 2024-05-20 14:58:23 湖北
导论写得太好了,里面选的论文看不懂。导论翻译见《生产:德勒兹与情动》,同时The Affect Theory Reader也有收录
0 有用 七斤 2024-05-20 14:58:23 湖北
导论写得太好了,里面选的论文看不懂。导论翻译见《生产:德勒兹与情动》,同时The Affect Theory Reader也有收录
9 有用 Eco 2018-05-09 09:26:30
Affective turn,一言以蔽之:对身体、物质与技术的重新形构。Hardt序言主要梳理了Affect在Spinoza意义上(身心关系问题)的起源,最后他还不忘说说自己的affective-labor。Hardt毕竟是一个搞政治哲学的,他对affect在艺术中的巨大潜力竟然一笔带过……所以这本书的副标题是theorizing the social。相比这本书的编者Patricia,《The ... Affective turn,一言以蔽之:对身体、物质与技术的重新形构。Hardt序言主要梳理了Affect在Spinoza意义上(身心关系问题)的起源,最后他还不忘说说自己的affective-labor。Hardt毕竟是一个搞政治哲学的,他对affect在艺术中的巨大潜力竟然一笔带过……所以这本书的副标题是theorizing the social。相比这本书的编者Patricia,《The Neuro-Image 》的Patricia更加接近Deleuze论述的affect。所以,斯宾诺莎-加塔利-马苏米-哈特是“the political of affect”一路的,而德勒兹才真正发现了affect在艺术中的巨大潜力。 (展开)
4 有用 蝴蝶飞噜 2018-03-19 16:53:21
正文一點沒看,就快速瀏覽找關鍵句了...陸揚寫了一篇《“情感轉向”的理論資源》,比較易懂
0 有用 Adynamia 2015-10-13 12:27:37
只有三篇文章值得一读
3 有用 党员福柯 2015-09-30 00:27:30
慎选,一半的文章都挺实验性的,不是自传体就是纯理论,对熵理论那套实在接受无能。剩下一半的文章还是要基于情感劳动这一经验切入点,然后看脑洞开到多大。Hardt的前言言简意赅,交代了affective turn在Spinoza脉络上的起源以及他自己affective labour概念的双重意涵,点出了非物质类符码、信息、观念、图像对于情感能力及政治可能性的影响。