Name: Who We Are and How We Got Here
ISBN: 9780198821250

作者: David Reich
出版社: OUP Oxford
副标题: Ancient DNA and the New Science of the Human Past
出版年: 2018-3-27
页数: 368
定价: GBP 20.00
装帧: Hardcover
ISBN: 9780198821250

豆瓣评分

9.0

31人评价

5星

61.3%
4星

35.5%
3星

3.2%
2星

0.0%
1星

0.0%

评价:

内容简介 · · · · · ·

A groundbreaking book about how ancient DNA has profoundly changed our understanding of human history.

Geneticists like David Reich have made astounding advances in the field of genomics, which is proving to be as important as archeology, linguistics, and written records as a means to understand our ancestry.

In Who We Are and How We Got Here, Reich allows readers to discover...

(展开全部)

作者简介 · · · · · ·

DAVID REICH, Professor of Genetics at Harvard Medical School, and a Howard Hughes Medical Institute Investigator, is one of the world’s leading pioneers in analyzing ancient human DNA. In a 2015 article in Nature, he was named one of ten people who matter in all of the sciences for his contribution to transforming ancient DNA data "from niche pursuit to industrial process." Awa...

(展开全部)

原文摘录 · · · · · · ( 全部 )

我们科学家，受困于科研资助体制，经常要证明我们的研究工作在卫生或科技方面有实用价值。但是，人类的好奇心本身难道不应该被认可吗？ (查看原文)

hedgehog 1 回复 5赞 2019-11-26 15:09:28

—— 引自章节：引言以人为镜，可以明得失；以史为镜，可以知兴替
一个人的基因组内能记录众多祖先的历史，一个人身上能承载一个人群的过去。 (查看原文)

hedgehog 2赞 2019-11-26 15:11:35

—— 引自章节：01我们是谁

> 全部原文摘录

豆瓣成员常用的标签(共48个) · · · · · ·

科普进化生物学 Biology 人类学

喜欢读"Who We Are and How We Got Here"的人也喜欢 · · · · · ·

: Numbers and the Making of Us

: The Secret of Our Success

: The Extended Phenotype

: Oxygen

: The Beak of the Finch

: War in Human Civilization

: Adam's Tongue

: 上古汉语词根

: 造就适者

: The Creation of Inequality

我来说两句

短评 · · · · · · ( 全部 14 条 )

Who We Are and How We Got Here的话题 · · · · · · ( 全部条 )

什么是话题

无论是一部作品、一个人，还是一件事，都往往可以衍生出许多不同的话题。将这些话题细分出来，分别进行讨论，会有更多收获。

我要写书评

Who We Are and How We Got Here的书评 · · · · · · ( 全部 12 条 )

热门 / 最新 / 好友 /只看本版本的评论

格列柯南 2019-07-07 05:04:42 浙江人民出版社2019版

人类起源，还欠缺中国浓重一笔

考古学、历史学、人类学和语言学等领域，都是有着比较深厚历史，积累了丰富研究成果的学术领域。在这几个领域里，你能想到的，前人都已经说了，要想真正提出具有原创性，又具备科学基础的见解，几乎比登天还难。本学科内很难有创新，而来自另一个学科的研究，却会打破这些领... (展开)

1 4回应

TTIM 2019-06-12 15:22:35 浙江人民出版社2019版

强悍理性中的一点激情最动人心

这篇书评可能有关键情节透露

书中内容摘选：到了2015年底，我在哈佛的古DNA实验室已经发布了全世界一半以上的古人类全基因组。历史并不必然走向现代。人类历史中充满了各式各样的死胡同。社会地位高的人群的男性，往往会迎娶社会地位低的人群的女性。很有意思吧，遗传学的数据能够如此鞭辟入里地揭示过... (展开)

3回应

思考的猫 2019-09-08 14:47:15 浙江人民出版社2019版

《人类起源的故事》：我们从何而来，我们将去向何方

很多时候，人类对世界某个领域的认知，往往会因为一些底层认知的改变而发生重大变化，有时候是从错误到正确，如“地心说”到“日心说”，有时候是进化和完善，如从“经典物理”到“量子物理”。有时候，甚至一些昔日看起来不是“一路人”的学科发展也会相互影响，产生更大的认... (展开)

0回应

Műśśťááhvááş: 2018-10-25 16:38:45

A Revolutionary Scenario of Human Past

The best, most accurate and scientific depiction on human past till now. Thank to genii Pääbo, Reich, Willerslev and their collegues and peers, by means of ancient human DNA and computational science, we now possess a pioneering horizon of the origin,... (展开)

0回应

trortd小马三茶 2019-10-26 08:17:22 浙江人民出版社2019版

肉身对历史的安慰

这是一本很好的书。古人类DNA分析的前沿综述（其实包括很多今人的）。而且这也是一本很有言外之意的书。书的目录组织很清楚，作者的引言也很直白。全书分为三个部分，第一部分侧重于古人类DNA研究的方向和进展，让读者初步感受对人类演化的研究成果。第二部分将地球人类分几大... (展开)

1 1回应

大吃一鲸 2019-08-12 14:53:13 浙江人民出版社2019版

厦门大学人类学研究所所长王传超：我们是谁，我们从哪里来

本文作者王传超，厦门大学人类学研究所所长，教授、博士生导师。《人类起源的故事》作者大卫·赖克教授是王传超和付巧妹的博士后导师。大卫·赖克（David Reich）是哈佛医学院遗传学系教授，是古DNA领域的顶尖学者。德国马普人类历史科学研究所的约翰内斯·克劳泽（Johannes ... (展开)

0回应

爱就码码字 2019-09-17 22:33:14 浙江人民出版社2019版

哈佛遗传学教授：用DNA检测技术寻根问祖，揭开人类历史发展之谜

这篇书评可能有关键情节透露

达尔文说：人是由猿猴进化而来的。而由猿猴进化成人，是一个漫长的发展过程。现在被普遍认同的说法是：人类发展成今天这个样子，经历了猿人、原始人、智人、现代人等4个阶段。人类发展的历史可以通过一些考古去发现去推断，那有没有更可靠的方式，来证明人类的发展历史，帮助我... (展开)

0回应

一二三四 2019-07-04 21:31:20 浙江人民出版社2019版

一时记起，做个记录

精彩的科普，特别是最近刚刚读过《进击的智人》，《人类前史》，《人类简史》之后，跟着作者一同抽丝剥茧，用新技术颠覆或证实原有一些以为板上钉钉的结论，进而又带来更多新的迷题与疑问，并提出新的猜想。而这种问题多于结论的阅读过程也更类似于科学研究的真正逻辑。新技术&... (展开)

0回应

Bittersweet 2020-11-30 11:14:02 浙江人民出版社2019版

人类起源的故事—插图

“印度历史的这一特征不由得让我百感交集。我是作为一个阿什肯纳兹犹太人开始这项研究工作的，我自己也是一个欧亚西部的古老种姓的成员。我对这种身份感到不自在，但又说不清楚哪里不自在。正是这些针对印度的研究让我的不自在清晰起来。我是个犹太人，这点我无法回避。我的父... (展开)

0回应

> 更多书评 12篇

读书笔记 · · · · · ·

我来写笔记

按有用程度
按页码先后
最新笔记

展开收起
第500页第八章

CaptainZ导导 (结出果)

摘抄——p500 There was a problem, though, which is that the analysis did not account for the 3 to 6 percent of ancestry that Australians inherited from archaic Denisovans.19 Because Denisovans were so divergent from modern humans, mixture from them could cause Europeans to share more mutations with Chinese than with Australian Aborigines. Indeed, this explained the findings. My laboratory showe...
2019-06-20 00:54 1人喜欢

摘抄——p500
There was a problem, though, which is that the analysis did not account for the 3 to 6 percent of ancestry that Australians inherited from archaic Denisovans.19 Because Denisovans were so divergent from modern humans, mixture from them could cause Europeans to share more mutations with Chinese than with Australian Aborigines. Indeed, this explained the findings. My laboratory showed that after accounting for Denisovan mixture, Europeans do not share more mutations with Chinese than with Australians, and so Chinese and Australians derive almost all their ancestry from a homogeneous population whose ancestors separated earlier from the ancestors of Europeans.20 This revealed that a series of major population splits in the history of non-Africans occurred in an exceptionally short time span—beginning with the separation of the lineages leading to West Eurasians and East Eurasians, and ending with the split of the ancestors of Australian Aborigines from the ancestors of many mainland East Eurasians. These population splits all occurred after the time when Neanderthals interbred with the ancestors of non-Africans fifty-four to forty-nine thousand years ago, and before the time when Denisovans and the ancestors of Australians mixed, genetically estimated to be 12 percent more recent than the Neanderthal/modern human admixture, that is, forty-nine to forty-four thousand years ago.21
摘录——p519
Our analysis supported a model of population history in which the modern human ancestry of the great majority of mainland East Asians living today derives largely from mixtures—in different proportions—of two lineages that separated very anciently. Members of these two lineages spread in all directions, and their mixture with each other and with some of the populations they encountered transformed the human landscape of East Asia.

推荐

回应 2019-06-20 00:54

展开收起
第500页第八章

CaptainZ导导 (结出果)

摘抄——p500 There was a problem, though, which is that the analysis did not account for the 3 to 6 percent of ancestry that Australians inherited from archaic Denisovans.19 Because Denisovans were so divergent from modern humans, mixture from them could cause Europeans to share more mutations with Chinese than with Australian Aborigines. Indeed, this explained the findings. My laboratory showe...
2019-06-20 00:54 1人喜欢

摘抄——p500
There was a problem, though, which is that the analysis did not account for the 3 to 6 percent of ancestry that Australians inherited from archaic Denisovans.19 Because Denisovans were so divergent from modern humans, mixture from them could cause Europeans to share more mutations with Chinese than with Australian Aborigines. Indeed, this explained the findings. My laboratory showed that after accounting for Denisovan mixture, Europeans do not share more mutations with Chinese than with Australians, and so Chinese and Australians derive almost all their ancestry from a homogeneous population whose ancestors separated earlier from the ancestors of Europeans.20 This revealed that a series of major population splits in the history of non-Africans occurred in an exceptionally short time span—beginning with the separation of the lineages leading to West Eurasians and East Eurasians, and ending with the split of the ancestors of Australian Aborigines from the ancestors of many mainland East Eurasians. These population splits all occurred after the time when Neanderthals interbred with the ancestors of non-Africans fifty-four to forty-nine thousand years ago, and before the time when Denisovans and the ancestors of Australians mixed, genetically estimated to be 12 percent more recent than the Neanderthal/modern human admixture, that is, forty-nine to forty-four thousand years ago.21
摘录——p519
Our analysis supported a model of population history in which the modern human ancestry of the great majority of mainland East Asians living today derives largely from mixtures—in different proportions—of two lineages that separated very anciently. Members of these two lineages spread in all directions, and their mixture with each other and with some of the populations they encountered transformed the human landscape of East Asia.

推荐

回应 2019-06-20 00:54

展开收起
第500页第八章

CaptainZ导导 (结出果)

摘抄——p500 There was a problem, though, which is that the analysis did not account for the 3 to 6 percent of ancestry that Australians inherited from archaic Denisovans.19 Because Denisovans were so divergent from modern humans, mixture from them could cause Europeans to share more mutations with Chinese than with Australian Aborigines. Indeed, this explained the findings. My laboratory showe...
2019-06-20 00:54 1人喜欢

摘抄——p500
There was a problem, though, which is that the analysis did not account for the 3 to 6 percent of ancestry that Australians inherited from archaic Denisovans.19 Because Denisovans were so divergent from modern humans, mixture from them could cause Europeans to share more mutations with Chinese than with Australian Aborigines. Indeed, this explained the findings. My laboratory showed that after accounting for Denisovan mixture, Europeans do not share more mutations with Chinese than with Australians, and so Chinese and Australians derive almost all their ancestry from a homogeneous population whose ancestors separated earlier from the ancestors of Europeans.20 This revealed that a series of major population splits in the history of non-Africans occurred in an exceptionally short time span—beginning with the separation of the lineages leading to West Eurasians and East Eurasians, and ending with the split of the ancestors of Australian Aborigines from the ancestors of many mainland East Eurasians. These population splits all occurred after the time when Neanderthals interbred with the ancestors of non-Africans fifty-four to forty-nine thousand years ago, and before the time when Denisovans and the ancestors of Australians mixed, genetically estimated to be 12 percent more recent than the Neanderthal/modern human admixture, that is, forty-nine to forty-four thousand years ago.21
摘录——p519
Our analysis supported a model of population history in which the modern human ancestry of the great majority of mainland East Asians living today derives largely from mixtures—in different proportions—of two lineages that separated very anciently. Members of these two lineages spread in all directions, and their mixture with each other and with some of the populations they encountered transformed the human landscape of East Asia.

推荐

回应 2019-06-20 00:54

在这本书的论坛里发言

+ 加入购书单

这本书的其他版本 · · · · · · ( 全部2 )

浙江人民出版社（2019）
8.6分 415人读过

展开有售 (7)

以下书单推荐 · · · · · · ( 全部 )

谁读这本书?

Charlkeit

2月23日想读

amino

2月13日想读

小王

2月1日想读

tags:Evolution DavidReich

psunny

1月31日读过

> 15人在读

> 32人读过

> 440人想读

二手市场

在豆瓣转让有440人想读,手里有一本闲着?
多抓鱼 | 孔网上门收书
转让给其他二手平台？

订阅关于Who We Are and How We Got Here的评论:
feed: rss 2.0

Who We Are and How We Got Here

内容简介 · · · · · ·

作者简介 · · · · · ·

原文摘录 · · · · · · ( 全部 )

豆瓣成员常用的标签(共48个) · · · · · ·

喜欢读"Who We Are and How We Got Here"的人也喜欢 · · · · · ·

短评 · · · · · · ( 全部 14 条 )

0 有用 Blue Jaguar 2019-02-24

0 有用 Gui_Zhe 2019-09-05

0 有用 eapass 2018-06-17

0 有用八卦books 2018-07-12

0 有用 Lacrimosal 2020-01-02

0 有用 canapotery 2020-01-09

0 有用 Lacrimosal 2020-01-02

0 有用 Gui_Zhe 2019-09-05

0 有用地中海胖叔 2019-08-26

0 有用 #凝夜紫# 2019-08-11

Who We Are and How We Got Here的话题 · · · · · · ( 全部条 )

Who We Are and How We Got Here的书评 · · · · · · ( 全部 12 条 )

人类起源，还欠缺中国浓重一笔

强悍理性中的一点激情最动人心

《人类起源的故事》：我们从何而来，我们将去向何方

A Revolutionary Scenario of Human Past

肉身对历史的安慰

厦门大学人类学研究所所长王传超：我们是谁，我们从哪里来

哈佛遗传学教授：用DNA检测技术寻根问祖，揭开人类历史发展之谜

最新，最专业，最硬核

一时记起，做个记录

人类起源的故事—插图

读书笔记 · · · · · ·

展开 收起
第500页第八章

展开 收起
第500页第八章

展开 收起
第500页第八章

这本书的其他版本 · · · · · · ( 全部2 )

以下书单推荐 · · · · · · ( 全部 )

谁读这本书?

二手市场

Who We Are and How We Got Here

内容简介 · · · · · ·

作者简介 · · · · · ·

原文摘录 · · · · · · ( 全部 )

豆瓣成员常用的标签(共48个) · · · · · ·

喜欢读"Who We Are and How We Got Here"的人也喜欢 · · · · · ·

短评 · · · · · · ( 全部 14 条 )

0 有用 Blue Jaguar 2019-02-24

0 有用 Gui_Zhe 2019-09-05

0 有用 eapass 2018-06-17

0 有用 八卦books 2018-07-12

0 有用 Lacrimosal 2020-01-02

0 有用 canapotery 2020-01-09

0 有用 Lacrimosal 2020-01-02

0 有用 Gui_Zhe 2019-09-05

0 有用 地中海胖叔 2019-08-26

0 有用 #凝夜紫# 2019-08-11

读书笔记 · · · · · ·

这本书的其他版本 · · · · · · ( 全部2 )

以下书单推荐 · · · · · · ( 全部 )

谁读这本书?

二手市场

0 有用八卦books 2018-07-12

0 有用地中海胖叔 2019-08-26