Let me begin with a confession: I am a Professor of Economics who has never really trained as an economist. While I may have a PhD in Economics, I do not believe I have ever attended more than a few lectures on economics! But let's take things one at a time.
I was born in Athens back in the mists of 1961. Greece was, at the time, struggling to shed the post-civil war veil of totalitarianism. Alas, those hopes were dashed after a brief period of hope and promise. So, by the time I was six, in April of 1967, a military coup d' etat plunged us all into the depths of a hideous neo-Nazi dictatorship. Those bleak days remain with me. They endowed me with a sense of what it means to be both unfree and, at once, convinced that the possibilities for progress and improvement are endless. The dictatorship collapsed when I was at junior high school. This meant that the enthusiasm and political renaissance that followed the junta's collapse coincided with my coming of age. It was to prove a significant factor in the way that I resisted conversion to the ways of anglosaxon cynicism in the years to come.
When the time came to decide on my post-secondary education, around 1976, the prospect of another dictatorship haδ not been erased. Given that students were the first and foremost targets of the military and paramilitary forces, my parents determined that it was too risky for me to stay on in Greece and attend University there. So, off I went, in 1978, to study in Britain. My initial urge was to study physics but I soon came to the conclusion that the lingua franca of political discourse was economics. Thus, I enrolled at the University of Essex to study the dismal science. However, within weeks of lectures I was aghast at the content of my textbooks and the inane musings of my lecturers. Quite clearly economics was only interested in putting together simplistic mathematical models. Worse still, the mathematics utilised were third rate and, consequently, the economic thinking that emanated from it was atrocious. In short shrift I changed my enrolment from the economics to the mathematics school, thinking that if I am going to be reading maths I might as well read proper maths. After graduating from Essex, I moved to the University of Birmingham where I read toward an MSc in Mathematical Statistics. By that stage I was convinced that my escape from economics had been clean and irreversible. How deluded that conviction was! When looking for a thesis topic, I stumbled upon a piece of econometrics (a statistical test of some economic model of industrial disputes) that angered me so much with its methodological sloppiness that I set out to demolish it. That was the trap and I fell right into it. From that moment onwards, a series of anti-economic treatises followed, a Phd in... Economics and, naturally, a career in exclusively Economics Departments, in every one of which I enjoyed debunking that which my colleagues considered to be legitimate 'science'.
Between 1982 and 1988 I taught at the University of Essex, the University of East Anglia and the University of Cambridge. My break from Britain occurred in 1987 on the night of Mrs Thatcher's third election victory. It was too much to bear. Soon I started planning my escape. But where to? Continental Europe was closed to non-native academics, at that time, and Greece awaited with open arms - to enlist me into its conscript army. No, thanks, I thought to myself. Even Thatcherism is preferrable. My break came shortly after when, out of the blue, I was invited to take up a lectureship at the University of Sydney. And so the die was cast. From 1988 to 2000 I lived and worked in Sydney, with short stints at the University of Glasgow (and an even shorter one at the Université Catholique de Louvain). In 2000 a combination of nostalgia and abhorrence of the concervative turn of the land down under (under the government of that awful little man, John Howard) led me to return to Greece
1 有用 • 2020-08-02 15:27:46
Rather than being enslaved by satisfaction, we need the liberty to be dissatisfied. The best way to see your country, your society, is to see it through the eyes of an outsider,a refugee. The epilogue... Rather than being enslaved by satisfaction, we need the liberty to be dissatisfied. The best way to see your country, your society, is to see it through the eyes of an outsider,a refugee. The epilogue is something like Zima blue. (展开)
1 有用 一只兔糖 2019-09-01 06:03:51
很有趣的一本经济学科普书(popular economics)。作者引经据典,通过文学典故做类比,生动地简述了市场经济的原理与利弊,还是值得一读的。
0 有用 amstel 2019-11-10 21:23:24
wonderfully interesting, nice introduction of economy for teenagers
0 有用 六月小茶纪 2022-04-04 05:49:58
#ReadingChallenge06/24 让我升起“如果早读了这本书就不会那么排斥经济学”的经济学入门书籍。作者以给女儿对话的口吻,摒弃所有数据分析和高深术语,形象简洁地介绍了当代经济学概念如何形成(债务、货币、劳动力市场等)以及社会如何演变到如今的运行模式(事实上涵盖了不少思想著作,如不平等一章基于戴蒙德),以希腊神话做类比十分独特。作者是经济学+数学博士,是经济学教授,也在希腊债务危机时当... #ReadingChallenge06/24 让我升起“如果早读了这本书就不会那么排斥经济学”的经济学入门书籍。作者以给女儿对话的口吻,摒弃所有数据分析和高深术语,形象简洁地介绍了当代经济学概念如何形成(债务、货币、劳动力市场等)以及社会如何演变到如今的运行模式(事实上涵盖了不少思想著作,如不平等一章基于戴蒙德),以希腊神话做类比十分独特。作者是经济学+数学博士,是经济学教授,也在希腊债务危机时当过财政部长和“三驾马车”谈判借贷救助,学识和实践经验深厚,因此在epilogue里对经济学的批判让我信服(不是会用数学就是科学家,经济学家更像思想者)。当初如果能退几步从外部看这个学科,学习心态会调整得平和很多。 (展开)
0 有用 亚洲小jimii 2021-03-14 20:52:37
The epilogue’s so impressive! Throughout the book, I’ve learnt not only how credit, surplus and commodification play inevitable roles in the whole process of today’s market society, but what we dismis... The epilogue’s so impressive! Throughout the book, I’ve learnt not only how credit, surplus and commodification play inevitable roles in the whole process of today’s market society, but what we dismiss so much, like exploitation, inequality and contamination actually resonate with the principles we embraced, i.e freedom. Anyway be alert, peace (展开)
0 有用 花花 2024-09-10 02:24:47 瑞士
用简单的生活例子去诠释经济学原理 一边看一遍联想到最近的大环境 突然恍然大悟
0 有用 六月小茶纪 2022-04-04 05:49:58
#ReadingChallenge06/24 让我升起“如果早读了这本书就不会那么排斥经济学”的经济学入门书籍。作者以给女儿对话的口吻,摒弃所有数据分析和高深术语,形象简洁地介绍了当代经济学概念如何形成(债务、货币、劳动力市场等)以及社会如何演变到如今的运行模式(事实上涵盖了不少思想著作,如不平等一章基于戴蒙德),以希腊神话做类比十分独特。作者是经济学+数学博士,是经济学教授,也在希腊债务危机时当... #ReadingChallenge06/24 让我升起“如果早读了这本书就不会那么排斥经济学”的经济学入门书籍。作者以给女儿对话的口吻,摒弃所有数据分析和高深术语,形象简洁地介绍了当代经济学概念如何形成(债务、货币、劳动力市场等)以及社会如何演变到如今的运行模式(事实上涵盖了不少思想著作,如不平等一章基于戴蒙德),以希腊神话做类比十分独特。作者是经济学+数学博士,是经济学教授,也在希腊债务危机时当过财政部长和“三驾马车”谈判借贷救助,学识和实践经验深厚,因此在epilogue里对经济学的批判让我信服(不是会用数学就是科学家,经济学家更像思想者)。当初如果能退几步从外部看这个学科,学习心态会调整得平和很多。 (展开)
0 有用 000 2021-08-27 03:17:49
经济学入门看看,总体不错。不过浅出没有很深入,个人倾向有点强。
0 有用 亚洲小jimii 2021-03-14 20:52:37
The epilogue’s so impressive! Throughout the book, I’ve learnt not only how credit, surplus and commodification play inevitable roles in the whole process of today’s market society, but what we dismis... The epilogue’s so impressive! Throughout the book, I’ve learnt not only how credit, surplus and commodification play inevitable roles in the whole process of today’s market society, but what we dismiss so much, like exploitation, inequality and contamination actually resonate with the principles we embraced, i.e freedom. Anyway be alert, peace (展开)
1 有用 • 2020-08-02 15:27:46
Rather than being enslaved by satisfaction, we need the liberty to be dissatisfied. The best way to see your country, your society, is to see it through the eyes of an outsider,a refugee. The epilogue... Rather than being enslaved by satisfaction, we need the liberty to be dissatisfied. The best way to see your country, your society, is to see it through the eyes of an outsider,a refugee. The epilogue is something like Zima blue. (展开)