In China, as elsewhere, the debate over genetically modified organisms has become polarized into anti- and pro-GMO camps. Given the size of China’s population and market, much is at stake in conflicts over regulation for domestic as well as international actors. In this book, Cong Cao provides an even-handed analysis that illuminates the tensions that have shaped China’s policy toward agricultural biotechnology in a global perspective.
Cao presents a comprehensive and systematic analysis of how China’s policy toward research and commercialization of genetically modified crops has shifted that explains how China’s changing GMO stances reflect its evolving position on the world stage. While China’s scientific community has set the agenda, it has encountered resistance rooted in concerns over food safety and consumers’ rights as well as issues of intellectual property rights and food sovereignty. Although Chinese leaders at first sought to take advantage of the biotech revolution by promoting GMO crop consumption, Cao demonstrates that policy has since become precautionary, as seen in new laws and regulations grounded in concerns over safety and the deferral of commercialization of GM rice. He presents China’s policies in light of changing global attitudes toward GM crops: As shifts in China have closely followed global trends, so has domestic activism. Drawing on government and scientific documents as well as interviews with scientists, officials, policy analysts, activists, and journalists, GMO China is an important book for China studies, science and technology studies, policy analysts, and professionals interested in the Chinese biotechnology market.
0 有用 廖芜 2020-11-30 12:58:36
755. GMO研究和产品在中国发展过程的事无巨细的总结,但也基本上只是叙述性的总结而已。作者试图在GMO发展过程中state和各个社会领域的互相渗透来体现state理念的permeability,但这也只是隐晦的,并不直接点出也没有具体的理论讨论作为基础的。而作为对比的美国,欧盟和印度的案例也基本上就是事件合集,印度那么多极好的postcolonial的解析基本上没有出现。整体上就是非常实际的将... 755. GMO研究和产品在中国发展过程的事无巨细的总结,但也基本上只是叙述性的总结而已。作者试图在GMO发展过程中state和各个社会领域的互相渗透来体现state理念的permeability,但这也只是隐晦的,并不直接点出也没有具体的理论讨论作为基础的。而作为对比的美国,欧盟和印度的案例也基本上就是事件合集,印度那么多极好的postcolonial的解析基本上没有出现。整体上就是非常实际的将各方的concern和profit展现出来,大概讲解一下tension和痛点在哪里,顺带一些定量研究唬唬人。差强人意。 (展开)