A pithy work of philosophical anthropology that explores why humans find moral orders in natural orders.
Why have human beings, in many different cultures and epochs, looked to nature as a source of norms for human behavior? From ancient India and ancient Greece, medieval France and Enlightenment America, up to the latest controversies over gay marriage and cloning, natural orders have been enlisted to illustrate and buttress moral orders. Revolutionaries and reactionaries alike have appealed to nature to shore up their causes. No amount of philosophical argument or political critique deters the persistent and pervasive temptation to conflate the "is" of natural orders with the "ought" of moral orders.
In this short, pithy work of philosophical anthropology, Lorraine Daston asks why we continually seek moral orders in natural orders, despite so much good counsel to the contrary. She outlines three specific forms of natural order in the Western philosophical tradition-specific natures, local natures, and universal natural laws-and describes how each of these three natural orders has been used to define and oppose a distinctive form of the unnatural. She argues that each of these forms of the unnatural triggers equally distinctive emotions: horror, terror, and wonder.
Daston proposes that human reason practiced in human bodies should command the attention of philosophers, who have traditionally yearned for a transcendent reason, valid for all species, all epochs, even all planets.
0 有用 把沼王作为方法 2022-02-07 11:32:32
薄薄的一本小册子 Susan Gal强力推荐 语言通俗易懂 观点清晰明确 第一次读到这样的哲学作品
1 有用 Coppelia 2023-10-15 15:40:33 广东
很强 但有些地方实例不足 讲phenomena那里很好玩 It is the natural appearances of day-in, day-out experience, not the natural depths revealed by electron microscopes and cyclotrons, which still shape some of our most stu... 很强 但有些地方实例不足 讲phenomena那里很好玩 It is the natural appearances of day-in, day-out experience, not the natural depths revealed by electron microscopes and cyclotrons, which still shape some of our most sturdy intuitions about what an order can be. And there is no morality that does not conjure up an order, a bulwark against chaos. The word made flesh. (展开)
1 有用 咖喱酱 2023-04-26 00:16:28 加拿大
和Rules的部分章节有重合。
0 有用 帕格尼尼说不难 2026-03-26 15:04:54 意大利
a reminder to wonder
0 有用 天天 2022-08-31 13:14:01 上海
并不能全看懂。讲了一些问题,比如does nature have value,does morality follow the law of nature,what is unnatural,how and why has 'is' be transmuted into 'ought'。有两点启发:1. laws of nature 并不是ultimate goal, they contradic... 并不能全看懂。讲了一些问题,比如does nature have value,does morality follow the law of nature,what is unnatural,how and why has 'is' be transmuted into 'ought'。有两点启发:1. laws of nature 并不是ultimate goal, they contradict with each other. 2. we can only comprehend and present with senses, surfaces and phenomena. (展开)