Cuteness has taken the planet by storm. Global sensations Hello Kitty and Pokémon, the works of artists Takashi Murakami and Jeff Koons, Heidi the cross-eyed opossum and E.T.—all reflect its gathering power. But what does “cute” mean, as a sensibility and style? Why is it so pervasive? Is it all infantile fluff, or is there something more uncanny and even menacing going on—in a lighthearted way? In The Power of Cute, Simon May provides nuanced and surprising answers.
We usually see the cute as merely diminutive, harmless, and helpless. May challenges this prevailing perspective, investigating everything from Mickey Mouse to Kim Jong-il to argue that cuteness is not restricted to such sweet qualities but also beguiles us by transforming or distorting them into something of playfully indeterminate power, gender, age, morality, and even species. May grapples with cuteness’s dark and unpindownable side—unnerving, artful, knowing, apprehensive—elements that have fascinated since ancient times through mythical figures, especially hybrids like the hermaphrodite and the sphinx. He argues that cuteness is an addictive antidote to today’s pressured expectations of knowing our purpose, being in charge, and appearing predictable, transparent, and sincere. Instead, it frivolously expresses the uncertainty that these norms deny: the ineliminable uncertainty of who we are; of how much we can control and know; of who, in our relations with others, really has power; indeed, of the very value and purpose of power.
The Power of Cute delves into a phenomenon that speaks with strange force to our age.
1 有用 IrisZ9 2022-12-19 23:23:08 广东
可可爱爱的封面,短评说的对,就是韩炳哲风格的小册子,读起来很爽口,很多金句可以摘进论文,但是nothing special.(可爱是一种权力,一种暴力,一种策略,一种营销手段,一种文化镜像,一种模棱两可反对二元论的游移状态……cuteness can be everything expect itself
4 有用 烤芬 2022-01-28 05:38:17
读的第一本关于「可爱」的书,虽并不算薄,但是是字大行稀比较好读的排版,每章都很短,让我犹读韩炳哲(或曰,感觉作者说得在理但又啥都没说清),倒是提供了一些简洁的文献综述以及谈论「可爱」时可以进入的切口。读的时候我一直在想猫,觉得人认为猫可爱真是合情合理,因为猫是怪怖的、不可控的、模棱两可的、充满不确定性的,猫与人的权力关系是暧昧的,与人的互动的每个瞬间都是稍纵即逝的;只有当人充分理解她在与猫的关系里... 读的第一本关于「可爱」的书,虽并不算薄,但是是字大行稀比较好读的排版,每章都很短,让我犹读韩炳哲(或曰,感觉作者说得在理但又啥都没说清),倒是提供了一些简洁的文献综述以及谈论「可爱」时可以进入的切口。读的时候我一直在想猫,觉得人认为猫可爱真是合情合理,因为猫是怪怖的、不可控的、模棱两可的、充满不确定性的,猫与人的权力关系是暧昧的,与人的互动的每个瞬间都是稍纵即逝的;只有当人充分理解她在与猫的关系里并不掌握全部权力,理解自己对猫的外表无非是对某种特定「无力感」的审美化而非猫真的软弱无辜时,人才会由衷地感到猫的可爱。猫是「cute」的代言,因为它们同时在物理、生理和心理意义上十分「acute」。 (展开)
0 有用 蓝 2022-11-02 03:04:59 安徽
日本人其实是真的懂了,没有解决自己制造的环境中的多层关系矛盾,就不存在真正的风控,市场和经济
0 有用 禅茶一味 2024-08-15 06:24:47 英国
Fascinating discussion. Good distinction between cute and kitsch. Cute is not the same as sweet. It's playful yet also uncanny and even menacing. It is innocent mischief, or maverick benevolence. Thin... Fascinating discussion. Good distinction between cute and kitsch. Cute is not the same as sweet. It's playful yet also uncanny and even menacing. It is innocent mischief, or maverick benevolence. Think Jeff Koons, 村上隆, 奈良美智, Hello Kitty, Mickey Mouse, Bill Clinton, Kim Jong Un, etc. It's non-judgemental, and that's the appeal. August 2024, London (展开)
0 有用 施奈德宝琳 2024-05-08 01:06:14 英国
一本比较缺乏deduction的书。但是例子和结论都特别精准。