A spirited, deeply researched exploration of why capitalism is bad for women and how, when done right, socialism leads to economic independence, better labor conditions, better work-life balance and, yes, even better sex.
In a witty, irreverent op-ed piece that went viral, Kristen Ghodsee argued that women had better sex under socialism. The response was tremendous -- clearly she articulated something many women had sensed for years: the problem is with capitalism, not with us.
Ghodsee, an acclaimed ethnographer and professor of Russian and East European Studies, spent years researching what happened to women in countries that transitioned from state socialism to capitalism. She argues here that unregulated capitalism disproportionately harms women, and that we should learn from the past. By rejecting the bad and salvaging the good, we can adapt some socialist ideas to the 21st century and improve our lives.
She tackles all aspects of a woman's life - work, parenting, sex and relationships, citizenship, and leadership. In a chapter called "Women: Like Men, But Cheaper," she talks about women in the workplace, discussing everything from the wage gap to harassment and discrimination. In "What To Expect When You're Expecting Exploitation," she addresses motherhood and how "having it all" is impossible under capitalism.
Women are standing up for themselves like never before, from the increase in the number of women running for office to the women's march to the long-overdue public outcry against sexual harassment. Interest in socialism is also on the rise - whether it's the popularity of Bernie Sanders or the skyrocketing membership numbers of the Democratic Socialists of America. It's become increasingly clear to women that capitalism isn't working for us, and Ghodsee is the informed, lively guide who can show us the way forward.
0 有用 czh19 2025-01-07 02:34:53 英国
“Sex is not a commodity to be bought or sold” 平等与独立是爱的前提
1 有用 安之若素 2022-08-25 06:46:56 美国
看到标题已经做好心理准备this is gonna be a bold book,没有想到真的读到supporting evidence的时候还是被男权话语的不要脸程度震惊到了。社会犯罪率、失业率的攀升竟然可以和女性太过accessible而让男人没有了奋斗的incentive挂钩,然后再怪到女性头上?????
1 有用 华之敖不理解 2022-09-20 13:50:45 北京
标题吸睛,同时也是犹豫是否能引进简中版的犹疑点。“如果想让未来与现在不同,那就研究过去。”两种社会制度下的不同,女性经济独立的重要性透出纸背,但即便是在当下,我国的农村女性依旧没能完全摆脱经济的依赖。无论何种颜色,性别议题终究是政治议题。
0 有用 日子旁见 2023-02-14 12:16:04 广东
取对自己有用的
0 有用 常务副momo 2023-11-12 10:03:02 美国
重点是“why”而非“Have better sex under socialism.”最后一章略显鸡汤,但整体是很好的普及读物。最后的suggested reading中搞混了王政的名和姓。