A spirited, deeply researched exploration of why capitalism is bad for women and how, when done right, socialism leads to economic independence, better labor conditions, better work-life balance and, yes, even better sex.
In a witty, irreverent op-ed piece that went viral, Kristen Ghodsee argued that women had better sex under socialism. The response was tremendous -- clearly she articulated something many women had sensed for years: the problem is with capitalism, not with us.
Ghodsee, an acclaimed ethnographer and professor of Russian and East European Studies, spent years researching what happened to women in countries that transitioned from state socialism to capitalism. She argues here that unregulated capitalism disproportionately harms women, and that we should learn from the past. By rejecting the bad and salvaging the good, we can adapt some socialist ideas to the 21st century and improve our lives.
She tackles all aspects of a woman's life - work, parenting, sex and relationships, citizenship, and leadership. In a chapter called "Women: Like Men, But Cheaper," she talks about women in the workplace, discussing everything from the wage gap to harassment and discrimination. In "What To Expect When You're Expecting Exploitation," she addresses motherhood and how "having it all" is impossible under capitalism.
Women are standing up for themselves like never before, from the increase in the number of women running for office to the women's march to the long-overdue public outcry against sexual harassment. Interest in socialism is also on the rise - whether it's the popularity of Bernie Sanders or the skyrocketing membership numbers of the Democratic Socialists of America. It's become increasingly clear to women that capitalism isn't working for us, and Ghodsee is the informed, lively guide who can show us the way forward.
0 有用 立夏华昭 2022-09-20 13:50:45 北京
标题吸睛,同时也是犹豫是否能引进简中版的犹疑点。“如果想让未来与现在不同,那就研究过去。”两种社会制度下的不同,女性经济独立的重要性透出纸背,但即便是在当下,我国的农村女性依旧没能完全摆脱经济的依赖。无论何种颜色,性别议题终究是政治议题。
0 有用 朴斯万 2021-12-21 08:11:59
非常好读!完全为大众写的书,获得了一些视角和启发!虽然有点快餐...三天读完。 Prunus d 想读 "这本书的特别之处在于:作者是伯克利研究苏东问题的,不完全是欧美那种自由左派视角,可能对我们现在的处境更有参考价值"
1 有用 肉汤拌饭吃八碗 2022-07-11 04:31:55
很好的一本书,绝不是标题党。Sex life is political. 在男女更平等,有社会安全网,不受资本和工作剥削的前提下,自然会享受更美好的性生活。要去想象光谱上另一种生活的可能。
0 有用 日子旁见 2023-02-14 12:16:04 广东
取对自己有用的
2 有用 阳光野良医 2022-04-27 10:32:54
资本主义将男人变成奴隶,而婚姻将女人变成奴隶的奴隶(the slave of a slave),在这样的境地之中,奴隶们激烈地反思抨击,奴隶的奴隶——女人,是否不该拥有选举权,毕竟她们只会为自己的利益投票。
0 有用 艾莉克斯 2023-03-14 09:16:17 安徽
读起来还挺平易近人,挺系统地介绍了女性经济地位对于女性权益的重要性以及历史上一些相关的人物和事件。最后一章说的以史为鉴,好读又入门,可以看更多相关的东西了解一下了。
0 有用 日子旁见 2023-02-14 12:16:04 广东
取对自己有用的
0 有用 顾予美 2022-10-12 22:38:37 加拿大
Audible | 没有给我太多的新知识。书名的sex只是个噱头,重点在女性经济独立。作者以东欧为例对比考察socialism里的女性经济独立是怎么让社会变得更好的。非常通俗易懂,适合对socialism和女性经济议题了解不多的读者作为入门普及读物。
0 有用 立夏华昭 2022-09-20 13:50:45 北京
标题吸睛,同时也是犹豫是否能引进简中版的犹疑点。“如果想让未来与现在不同,那就研究过去。”两种社会制度下的不同,女性经济独立的重要性透出纸背,但即便是在当下,我国的农村女性依旧没能完全摆脱经济的依赖。无论何种颜色,性别议题终究是政治议题。
1 有用 安之若素 2022-08-25 06:46:56 美国
看到标题已经做好心理准备this is gonna be a bold book,没有想到真的读到supporting evidence的时候还是被男权话语的不要脸程度震惊到了。社会犯罪率、失业率的攀升竟然可以和女性太过accessible而让男人没有了奋斗的incentive挂钩,然后再怪到女性头上?????