Acknowledgments
Introduction
David Plunkett, Scott Shapiro, and Kevin Toh
1. Peter Railton, University of Michigan
'We'll see you in court!': The Rule of Law as an Explanatory and Normative Kind
2. Nicholas Southwood, Australian National University
Law as Conventional Norms
3. David Copp, University of California, Davis
Legal Teleology: A Naturalist Account of the Normativity of Law
4. David Enoch, Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Is General Jurisprudence Interesting?
5. Kathyrn Lindeman, Saint Louis University
Legal Metanormativity: Lessons for and from Constitutivist Accounts in the Philosophy of Law
6. David Plunkett, Dartmouth College
Robust Normativity, Morality, and Legal Positivism
7. Mitchell Berman, University of Pennsylvania
Of Law and Other Artificial Normative Systems
8. George Letsas, University College London
Law's Full-Blooded Normativity
9. Stephen Finlay, University of Southern California
Defining Normativity
10. Kevin Toh, University College London
Legal Philosophy à la carte
11. Brian Leiter, University of Chicago
Theoretical Disagreements in Law: Another Look
12. Teresa Marques, Logos / University of Barcelona
Hybrid Dispositionalism and the Law
13. Alex Silk, University of Birmingham
Normativity in Language and Law
14. Katharina Nieswandt, Concordia University
Authority and Interest in the Theory of Right
15. Luís Duarte d'Almeida, University of Edinburgh
On the Legal Syllogism
16. Sam Shpall, University of Sydney
Dworkin's Literary Analogy
17. Connie Rosati, University of Arizona
Constitutional Realism
Index
· · · · · · (
收起)
0 有用 Golgotha 2022-04-22 17:25:50
根据标题选读
0 有用 𝑝𝑠𝑢𝑘ℎ𝑒̂ 2024-07-27 13:01:28 北京
只Finlay那篇。cognitivism and non-cognitivism talk about common object, basically, as we live in earth, as we are interested in same cases. Normativity exists in aspect a, aspect b...Each stance focuses o... 只Finlay那篇。cognitivism and non-cognitivism talk about common object, basically, as we live in earth, as we are interested in same cases. Normativity exists in aspect a, aspect b...Each stance focuses on some and ignores the other. I'm not saying Perspectivism is right, it helps to explain this mess; the debate can continue. boring (for me). (展开)
0 有用 KkykKYkkY 2025-11-23 21:23:48 广东
课程选读: introduction 2 Laws as Conventional Norms 3 Legal Teleology: ... 整体感觉还是太技术性的处理 not my favor O.O
1 有用 Nina 2019-12-05 23:51:47
Provocative, but too boring, sometimes trivial. Toh, Leiter, Plunkett, Enoch, Shpall五篇文章略可一读,Leiter驾简驭繁的功力深厚,哲学功底扎实。Toh另辟蹊径,但哲学指向明显,值得期待。