Philosophy of language explores some of the most abstract yet most fundamental questions in philosophy. The ideas of some of the subject's great founding figures, such as Gottlob Frege, Ludwig Wittgenstein and Bertrand Russell, as well as of more recent figures such as Saul Kripke and Hilary Putnam, are central to a great many philosophical debates to this day.
In this clear and carefully structured introduction to the subject Gary Kemp explains the following key topics:
• the basic nature of philosophy of language, its concepts, and its historical development
• Frege’s theory of sense and reference; Russell's theory of definite descriptions
• Wittgenstein's Tractatus, Ayer, and the Logical Positivists
• recent perspectives including Kripke, Kaplan and Putnam; arguments concerning necessity, indexicals, rigid designation and natural kinds
• The pragmatics of language, including speech-acts, presupposition and conversational implicature
• Davidson’s theory of language, the ‘principle of charity’, and the indeterminacy of interpretation
• puzzles surrounding the propositional attitudes (sentences which ascribe beliefs to people)
• Quine’s naturalism and its consequences for philosophy of language.
• The challenges presented by the later Wittgenstein
• Contemporary directions, including contextualism, fictional objects and the phenomenon of slurs
This second edition has been thoroughly revised to include new key topics and updated material. Chapter summaries, annotated further reading and a glossary make this an indispensable introduction to those teaching philosophy of language and will be particularly useful for students coming to the subject for the first time.
7 有用 妙吉祥虚空藏 2019-04-21 22:07:43
入门类书籍基本都要靠拓展阅读帮助理解,看这本时参考了其他教材和网路资料,不过不少地方现在也没能理解……= =。有个涉及卡普兰二维主义的图实在看不懂,到处问也没人知道,最后找了Gary Kemp的邮箱直接询问本人,不久就收到了细心的讲解,感人(后来发现其实那个图很简单,看不懂是我自己理解力太差)…… 课后问题有的很有趣,如果有提示或参考答案就好了,不过有的问题现在还是争议颇多,可能本身就没有什么固定... 入门类书籍基本都要靠拓展阅读帮助理解,看这本时参考了其他教材和网路资料,不过不少地方现在也没能理解……= =。有个涉及卡普兰二维主义的图实在看不懂,到处问也没人知道,最后找了Gary Kemp的邮箱直接询问本人,不久就收到了细心的讲解,感人(后来发现其实那个图很简单,看不懂是我自己理解力太差)…… 课后问题有的很有趣,如果有提示或参考答案就好了,不过有的问题现在还是争议颇多,可能本身就没有什么固定答案吧 (展开)
3 有用 睡觉的Aho 2020-07-30 17:11:14
不是适合引入的导论,处理议题很细致深入,篇幅却都给得很短。因为每章和整本书都缺乏明确的推进线索,在克里普克之后就有些烦于细节、疲于奔命的感觉了。戴维森的部分没太看懂。
0 有用 干什么 2023-07-19 23:37:45 上海
slur的部分挺有趣,如果你说“A wop is coming to the party”,你就涉嫌种族歧视;但如果你说“No wops are coming to the party”,你仍然涉嫌种族歧视。
0 有用 Lepus Viator 2021-01-11 03:09:04
有趣,但学得想死
0 有用 虹 2022-01-05 14:51:06
好书,终于啃完了
0 有用 干什么 2023-07-19 23:37:45 上海
slur的部分挺有趣,如果你说“A wop is coming to the party”,你就涉嫌种族歧视;但如果你说“No wops are coming to the party”,你仍然涉嫌种族歧视。
0 有用 Kdn 2022-01-21 01:37:02
各种意义上都非常大学教材。。。
0 有用 虹 2022-01-05 14:51:06
好书,终于啃完了
0 有用 Lepus Viator 2021-01-11 03:09:04
有趣,但学得想死
0 有用 fakefolkblues 2021-01-04 02:54:01
没看懂,我为什么不退课?我为什么不退课?我为什么不退课?