1) A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm
2) A robot must obey orders givein to it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
3) A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.
With these three, simple directives, Isaac Asimov changed our perception of robots forever when he formulated the laws governing their behavior. In I, Robot , Asimov chronicles the development of the robot through a series of interlinked stories: from its primitive origins in the present to its ultimate perfection in the not-so-distant future--a future in which humanity itself may be rendered obsolete.
Here are stories of robots gone mad, of mind-read robots, and robots with a sense of humor. Of robot politicians, and robots who secretly run the world--all told with the dramatic blend of science fact and science fiction that has become Asmiov's trademark.
Why, Stephen, if I am right, it means that the Machine is conducting our future for us not only simply in direct answer to our direct questions, but in general answer to the world situation and to human psychology as a whole. And to know that may make us unhappy and may hurt our pride. The Machine cannot, must not, make us unhappy. 遵循the first law of robotics的machine，好温柔。让我想到了poi里...
2021-02-18 00:50:11
Why, Stephen, if I am right, it means that the Machine is conducting our future for us not only simply in direct answer to our direct questions, but in general answer to the world situation and to human psychology as a whole. And to know that may make us unhappy and may hurt our pride. The Machine cannot, must not, make us unhappy.引自 "The Evitable Conflict" (1950)
遵循the first law of robotics的machine，好温柔。让我想到了poi里的AI，恰好也叫the machine
"How old are you?" she wanted to know. "Thirty-two," I said. "Then you don't remember a world without robots. There was a time when humanity faced the universe alone and without a friend. Now he has creatures to help him; stronger creatures than himself, more faithful, more useful, and absolutely devoted to him. Mankind is no longer alone. Have you ever thought of it that way?"
2017-09-02 16:50:19
"How old are you?" she wanted to know.
"Thirty-two," I said.
"Then you don't remember a world without robots. There was a time when humanity faced the universe alone and without a friend. Now he has creatures to help him; stronger creatures than himself, more faithful, more useful, and absolutely devoted to him. Mankind is no longer alone. Have you ever thought of it that way?"
"How old are you?" she wanted to know. "Thirty-two," I said. "Then you don't remember a world without robots. There was a time when humanity faced the universe alone and without a friend. Now he has creatures to help him; stronger creatures than himself, more faithful, more useful, and absolutely devoted to him. Mankind is no longer alone. Have you ever thought of it that way?"
2017-09-02 16:50:19
"How old are you?" she wanted to know.
"Thirty-two," I said.
"Then you don't remember a world without robots. There was a time when humanity faced the universe alone and without a friend. Now he has creatures to help him; stronger creatures than himself, more faithful, more useful, and absolutely devoted to him. Mankind is no longer alone. Have you ever thought of it that way?"
Why, Stephen, if I am right, it means that the Machine is conducting our future for us not only simply in direct answer to our direct questions, but in general answer to the world situation and to human psychology as a whole. And to know that may make us unhappy and may hurt our pride. The Machine cannot, must not, make us unhappy. 遵循the first law of robotics的machine，好温柔。让我想到了poi里...
2021-02-18 00:50:11
Why, Stephen, if I am right, it means that the Machine is conducting our future for us not only simply in direct answer to our direct questions, but in general answer to the world situation and to human psychology as a whole. And to know that may make us unhappy and may hurt our pride. The Machine cannot, must not, make us unhappy.引自 "The Evitable Conflict" (1950)
遵循the first law of robotics的machine，好温柔。让我想到了poi里的AI，恰好也叫the machine
Why, Stephen, if I am right, it means that the Machine is conducting our future for us not only simply in direct answer to our direct questions, but in general answer to the world situation and to human psychology as a whole. And to know that may make us unhappy and may hurt our pride. The Machine cannot, must not, make us unhappy. 遵循the first law of robotics的machine，好温柔。让我想到了poi里...
2021-02-18 00:50:11
Why, Stephen, if I am right, it means that the Machine is conducting our future for us not only simply in direct answer to our direct questions, but in general answer to the world situation and to human psychology as a whole. And to know that may make us unhappy and may hurt our pride. The Machine cannot, must not, make us unhappy.引自 "The Evitable Conflict" (1950)
遵循the first law of robotics的machine，好温柔。让我想到了poi里的AI，恰好也叫the machine
"How old are you?" she wanted to know. "Thirty-two," I said. "Then you don't remember a world without robots. There was a time when humanity faced the universe alone and without a friend. Now he has creatures to help him; stronger creatures than himself, more faithful, more useful, and absolutely devoted to him. Mankind is no longer alone. Have you ever thought of it that way?"
2017-09-02 16:50:19
"How old are you?" she wanted to know.
"Thirty-two," I said.
"Then you don't remember a world without robots. There was a time when humanity faced the universe alone and without a friend. Now he has creatures to help him; stronger creatures than himself, more faithful, more useful, and absolutely devoted to him. Mankind is no longer alone. Have you ever thought of it that way?"
椅子和盆友
江苏文艺出版社2013版
sera
江苏文艺出版社2013版
崔丽安的书影音
江苏文艺出版社2013版
往时瀚默
江苏文艺出版社2013版
自律.灰金刚
科学普及出版社1983版
木兰华夏
江苏文艺出版社2013版
泥醉天使
科学普及出版社1983版
Why, Stephen, if I am right, it means that the Machine is conducting our future for us not only simply in direct answer to our direct questions, but in general answer to the world situation and to human psychology as a whole. And to know that may make us unhappy and may hurt our pride. The Machine cannot, must not, make us unhappy. 遵循the first law of robotics的machine，好温柔。让我想到了poi里...
I imagine,however,that it was easier for her at age of fifteen than at eight. Still, it was a stupid and unnecessary attitude on the part of humanity.
0 有用 甲 2013-08-12 21:51:58
绝妙 美丽 亲切。可惜被乱七八糟的破事打乱了阅读节奏。有功夫的话上书评。PS：这次读英文版突然发现最后有个故事之前没看过，原来是中文版给删除了。
1 有用 一次心@黑木崖 2020-04-15 23:27:33
Powell和Donovan俩倒霉孩子
0 有用 greenlight 2012-07-21 00:35:47
想要原版！！！
0 有用 MonicaNoColor 2015-05-11 12:23:53
为什么电影这么好看 书这么难读下去 不过机器人三定律好像被广泛运用 大概是自己没读懂吧 最后还是靠中文版把review编完的 sigh
0 有用 綦 2020-11-09 10:55:39
机器之心的bug多多少少是人心投射的放大版。临床试验容易暴走难以校对，思想实验又很烧脑挂机。
0 有用 xuwei714 2022-04-13 05:01:20
小时候把阿西莫夫的全集读完过，只可惜书放在了教室的图书角就消失不见了。突然想重温这本书，准备读一下原版，听一听有声书，如果有空再看看电影。天知道多少年没看过威尔史密斯的片了。/读不进去，都不好意思告诉可爱的阿萌，哈哈哈哈/读进去还挺好看，前提是接受有点不认同的三大定律，但作者在自身圈定的范围内逻辑太强大，叹服。
0 有用 HHHH73920 2022-02-05 20:34:15
很精彩，不敢相信是1950年发表的书。虽然很多设定和现代科技已经不符了，但是当做alternative history来读就好。
0 有用 Nancy 2021-11-21 12:32:58
人类想象力的极限
0 有用 fldees 2021-11-09 15:59:04
七万字。八个半小时左右。仅就我浅薄的阅读量而言，本书确实为科幻作品立下一座丰碑。最令人印象深刻的是其贯穿全书的逻辑性与合理性。围绕三定律的引入，延伸，以及解释，用九篇悬疑风格的短篇便构造了极为扎实的背景舞台设定。而最大亮点甚至不在于此——阿西莫夫极具思辨风采的行文，服务于其对各种核心以及终极问题的思考，解答与留白，令读者身临其境，实在引人入胜。弱鸡词汇量所限，英文啃起来虽然多有停滞，仍不影响上佳的... 七万字。八个半小时左右。仅就我浅薄的阅读量而言，本书确实为科幻作品立下一座丰碑。最令人印象深刻的是其贯穿全书的逻辑性与合理性。围绕三定律的引入，延伸，以及解释，用九篇悬疑风格的短篇便构造了极为扎实的背景舞台设定。而最大亮点甚至不在于此——阿西莫夫极具思辨风采的行文，服务于其对各种核心以及终极问题的思考，解答与留白，令读者身临其境，实在引人入胜。弱鸡词汇量所限，英文啃起来虽然多有停滞，仍不影响上佳的整体阅读体验。作为科幻入门，值得力荐。 (展开)
0 有用 RogerZQ 2021-07-16 16:22:58
思想实验集