Eric Nelson is the Robert M. Beren Professor of Government at Harvard University. His research focuses on the history of political thought in early-modern Europe and America, and on the implications of that history for debates in contemporary political theory.
Particular interests include the history of republican political theory, the relationship between the history of political thought and the history of scholarship, theories of property, and the phenomenon of secularization.
Nelson's newest book, The Theology of Liberalism: Political Philosophy and the Justice of God, is forthcoming from Harvard University Press. His other books include The Royalist Revolution: Monarchy and the American Founding (Harvard/Belknap, 2014), which received the Society of the Cincinnati History Prize and was named a Choice Outstanding Academic Title of 2015, as well as a Choice "Top 25 Books for 2015" selection; The Hebrew Republic: Jewish Sources and the Transformation of European Political Thought (Harvard/Belknap, 2010), which received the Erwin Stein Prize and the Laura Shannon Prize in Contemporary European Studies and was named a Choice Outstanding Academic Title of 2010; and The Greek Tradition in Republican Thought (Cambridge University Press, 2004). He also edited Hobbes's translations of the Iliad and Odyssey for the Clarendon Edition of the Works of Thomas Hobbes (The Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2008). His essays have appeared in a wide range of scholarly journals and edited volumes. Nelson received his AB summa cum laude from Harvard University (1999) and his PhD from The University of Cambridge (2002). He has been awarded fellowships by the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation and the American Council of Learned Societies. He has also been a Junior Fellow in the Harvard Society of Fellows, a Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge, and a British Marshall Scholar.
11 有用 阅湖 2020-02-28 12:28:42
打通思想史(神正论)和当代政治理论任督二脉的杰作。从罗尔斯本科论文入手,析清罗尔斯正义论背后的“反伯拉纠主义”(anti-Palegianism)底色,进而呈现出当代自由主义在分配正义方面的根本困境。【挑剔如Samuel Moyn也不得不承认,“Nelson在其所涉足的每一个领域都有新东西可讲”,能翻译这么一位大神的著作也真是自己的一份荣幸了】
1 有用 Aureole 2019-12-09 16:35:25
谈representation的部分还有点意思
1 有用 涉春回 2022-05-15 12:26:24
序言有点被尼尔森圈粉。他的两个努力方向我都完全认同,就是不知道具体展开能做到多少哈哈哈哈哈哈。读完了前两章关于经典自由主义和佩拉鸠派关系的思想史梳理(学到了很多…),重点处理了霍布斯和洛克(强调了洛克在佩拉鸠的授权代表而非相似性代表脉络下为议会辩护的困难),对于佩拉鸠主义我也不了解,但至少按照作者的定义,我觉得他将卢梭放到这个佩拉鸠-自由主义传统肯定是不准确的哈哈哈。全书重点处理的罗尔斯没看,目的... 序言有点被尼尔森圈粉。他的两个努力方向我都完全认同,就是不知道具体展开能做到多少哈哈哈哈哈哈。读完了前两章关于经典自由主义和佩拉鸠派关系的思想史梳理(学到了很多…),重点处理了霍布斯和洛克(强调了洛克在佩拉鸠的授权代表而非相似性代表脉络下为议会辩护的困难),对于佩拉鸠主义我也不了解,但至少按照作者的定义,我觉得他将卢梭放到这个佩拉鸠-自由主义传统肯定是不准确的哈哈哈。全书重点处理的罗尔斯没看,目的还是缓和自由和平等之间的紧张,并希望通过从theodicy重新理解代表和政治权威问题(代表概念是关键),从而展望一种基于自由(而非平地而起的分配正义)的平等主义。 (展开)
0 有用 TOGOKeats 2022-12-17 07:02:11 美国
人到中年的罗尔斯重新翻开那本康德,他的眼前全是当年还在普林斯顿的自己。
1 有用 达伦终结者 2024-09-10 12:18:18 美国
这告诉我们本科最好不要写毕业论文,写了毕业论文的话就最好别成名,否则都得在死后被挖出来。罗尔斯的本科毕业论文和他正义论的联系种种其实也不是nelson的发现,很可惜的是nelson没有继续问实质性的问题,而只是讲了些在哲学史上有意思的故事(或者说,他的实质性论证实在是太轻飘飘了)。