In early twentieth-century China, Chen Diexian (1879–1940) was a maverick entrepreneur—at once a prolific man of letters and captain of industry, a magazine editor and cosmetics magnate. He tinkered with chemistry in his private studio, used local cuttlefish to source magnesium carbonate, and published manufacturing tips in how-to columns. In a rapidly changing society, Chen co...
In early twentieth-century China, Chen Diexian (1879–1940) was a maverick entrepreneur—at once a prolific man of letters and captain of industry, a magazine editor and cosmetics magnate. He tinkered with chemistry in his private studio, used local cuttlefish to source magnesium carbonate, and published manufacturing tips in how-to columns. In a rapidly changing society, Chen copied foreign technologies and translated manufacturing processes from abroad to produce adaptations of global commodities that outcompeted foreign brands. Engaging in the worlds of journalism, industry, and commerce, he drew on literati practices associated with late-imperial elites, but deployed them in novel ways within a culture of educated tinkering that generated industrial innovation.
Through the lens of Chen’s career, Eugenia Lean explores how unlikely individuals devised unconventional, homegrown approaches to industry and science in early twentieth-century China. She contends that Chen’s activities exemplify “vernacular industrialism,” the pursuit of industry and science outside of conventional venues, often involving ad hoc forms of knowledge and material work. Lean shows how vernacular industrialists accessed worldwide circuits of law and science and experimented with local and global processes of manufacturing to navigate, innovate, and compete in global capitalism. In doing so, they presaged the approach that has helped fuel China’s economic ascent in the twenty-first century. Moving away from conventional narratives that depict China as belatedly borrowing from Western technology, Vernacular Industrialism in China offers a new understanding of industrialization, going beyond material factors to show the central role of culture and knowledge production in technological and industrial change.
Eugenia Lean is professor of history and East Asian languages and cultures and current director of the Weatherhead East Asian Institute at Columbia University. She is the author of Public Passions: The Trial of Shi Jianqiao and the Rise of Popular Sympathy in Republican China (2007).
目录
· · · · · ·
Acknowledgments
Introduction
Part I: Gentlemanly Experimentation in Turn-of-the-Century Hangzhou
1. Utility of the Useless
Part II: Manufacturing Knowledge, 1914–1927
2. One Part Cow Fat, Two Parts Soda: Recipes for the Inner Chambers, 1914–1915
· · · · · ·
(更多)
Acknowledgments
Introduction
Part I: Gentlemanly Experimentation in Turn-of-the-Century Hangzhou
1. Utility of the Useless
Part II: Manufacturing Knowledge, 1914–1927
2. One Part Cow Fat, Two Parts Soda: Recipes for the Inner Chambers, 1914–1915
3. An Enterprise of Common Knowledge: Fire Extinguishers, 1916–1935
Part III: Manufacturing Objects, 1913–1942
4. Chinese Cuttlefish and Global Circuits: The Association of Household Industries
5. What’s in a Name? From Studio Appellation to Commercial Trademark
6. Compiling the Industrial Modern, 1930–1941
Conclusion
Glossary
Notes
References
Index
· · · · · · (收起)
Studies of the Weatherhead East Asian Institute(共10册),
这套丛书还有
《Revolution Goes East》《The North Korean Revolution, 1945-1950》《The Invention of Madness》《Tyranny of the Weak》《The North Korean Revolution, 1945-1950》
等
。
喜欢读"Vernacular Industrialism in China"的人也喜欢
· · · · · ·
文人与商人合二为一的先驱。“文人”(the chinese version of "the renaissance man")其实包含着很多现代社会被心理学研究证实的lead to entrepreneurship的先觉条件——knowing how to play well、涉猎广泛,那么为什么离商业一步之差呢?为什么需要不停的给”我不盈利“的disclaimer呢?
0 有用 Fly-by-night 2023-02-21 00:36:41 美国
核心的问题意识是定位中国现代化被遮蔽的场所,尤其是被五四叙述遮蔽的——旧文人、闺阁、商业杂志。通过陈蝶仙的个人案例指出工业化道路的多样性,即vernacular industrialism,具体包括:非正式、家庭作坊、没有国家支持、鼓捣山寨而非发明创新、工业生产与基于大众媒介的文化生产相配合。最终说明二十世纪初的中国工业化发展并非停滞失败。
0 有用 安之若素 2022-06-08 07:34:26
文人与商人合二为一的先驱。“文人”(the chinese version of "the renaissance man")其实包含着很多现代社会被心理学研究证实的lead to entrepreneurship的先觉条件——knowing how to play well、涉猎广泛,那么为什么离商业一步之差呢?为什么需要不停的给”我不盈利“的disclaimer呢?
6 有用 tWaTAvFW 2022-12-13 11:22:08 美国
完全不懂为什么这本书评分能这么高 作为一本研究20世纪上半叶中国工业发展的书 完全不engage economic history和history of capitalism的文献是不是有点说不过去 而且作为一本历史书 整个introduction连个source都不提 同时这个argument真的新吗 欧洲经济史的人早就做过类似的研究
1 有用 滴滴 2021-07-10 00:38:39
缝合怪也有春天
1 有用 stepahnieeee 2024-07-08 18:49:59 四川
读过的Eugenia Lean的第二本书,同样十分精彩!